Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Management of Vs S.Chandrasekaran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 30.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP.Nos.143 &23756 of 2024The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore Division) LImited No.37, Mettupalayam Road Coimbatore - 641 043. ... Petitioner Vs. S.Chandrasekaran ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the Award in C.P.No.43 of 2021 dated 12.07.2022 on the file of the Additional Labour Court, Coimbatore and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran For Respondent : Ms.V.PorkodiORDERThe above writ petition arise against the order passed by the Additional Labour Court, Coimbatore, in C.P.No.43 of 2021.2. The short facts are as follows :a) The respondent herein was a driver under the petitioner- Management. He joined the Head office branch of the petitioner-Corporation on 20.05.1998 on a daily wage of Rs.75/-. The re...
The Manager Vs Srinivasan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 30.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA & W.M.P.No. 5756 of 2023 The Manager M/s. Jothi Chlorate, R.S.No.56/3, Polagam Village, T.R.Pattinam, Karaikal, Puducherry. ...Petitioner Vs. Srinivasan ...Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Puducherry relating to the order dated 24.11.2022 passed in IA.No.5 of 2022 in ID(L).No.15 of 2018 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Puducherry and quash the same and consequently allow IA.No.5 of 2022 in ID(L).No.15 of 2018 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Puducherry. For Petitioner : Mr. T.Sai Krishnan For Respondent : Mr. V.GovardhananORDERIt is informed that the matter has been settled before the Lok Adalat. Therefore, nothing survives for consideration. The Writ Petiti...
Dr.P.V.Bose, vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and M.P.No.2 of 2013 P.V.Bose ... Petitioner Vs. New Delhi 110 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 2nd respondent inorder dated 23.07.2013 and quash the same.For Petitioner : M/s.Mohammed Ismail For R4 : Mr.P.R.GopinathanORDERThis matter earlier came up for consideration before this Court on 23.06.2025 and the same was adjourned at the instance of Mr.A.Mohammed Ismail to enable him to file a change of vakalat.2. M/s.P.Saravana Sowmiyan, learned counsel on record forpetitioner also submitted that he has given a change of vakalat in favour of Mr.A.Mohammed Ismail. However, as on date no appearance could be entered by the learned counsel by filing appropriate vakalat. However, this Court, having perused the relief sought in the present writ petition, ha...
Alamelu Vs Ramachandran (died), 1.Murthy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate: 30.06.2025Coram:The Honourable Mrs.Justice K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI CMP No. 4949 of 2025 in S.A.No.382 of 2022 Alamelu W/o. Viswanathan, Voikkalkarai Street, Cholampettai, Mayiladuthurai Taluk and Munsif and 8 others. .... PetitionersVersusGOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.sukORDERFor the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Petition is ordered.2. The Registry is directed to carry out the amendment and list the matter in regular course. Suk 30.06.2025...
Vicky M Balani vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR1. Vicky M Balani 2.Mrs.Hrithika Dinesh M. Balani3. Mr.Haresh Rajkumar Balani4. Dinesh Balani ...Petitioners Vs1. State by (R1 amended as per the order dated 16/04/2025 in Crl.M.P.No.7645/2025 in Crl.O.P.No.4520/2025)2.State by Chennai-600 034 ....Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS,to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest pending investigation in PCR.No.15363 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. Page No.1 of 3 For Petitioner : Mr.Shoiab Fazil For Respondent : Mr.V.Meganathan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is...
C.Jeyamani, Vs The Director General of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
W.M.P.No.8271 of 2025 W.M.P.No.8271 of 2025 in W.P.No.10558 of 2017MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR,J.This application is filed seeking amendment of the name of the petitioner as A.Jeyamani instead of C.Jeyamani in the cause title of the Writ Petition No.10558 of 2017, and consequently to amend in the final order dated 08.01.2025 passed in the said writ petition.2. This Court, having verified the contents of the affidavit filed in support ofthis application as well as the affidavit filed in the main writ petition, is convinced that there is a typographical error in the name of the petitioner, which is erroneously mentioned as C.Jeymani instead of A.Jeyamani.3. In view of the same, this application is ordered and the name of the petitioner is amended as A.Jeyamani instead of C.Jeyamani.4. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments and issue finalorder dated 08.01.2025 afresh.30.06.2025 dpa 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.Chandrasekaran Vs Thiru. Srinivas R. Reddy, I.F.S., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR P.Chandrasekaran .. Petitioner Vs. .. Respondents Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience in not complying with the order dated 15.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.30331 of 2012. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Mani For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajesh Government AdvocateORDERIt is represented by the learned counsel on either side that the orderdated 15.12.2023 passed in W.P.No.30331 of 2021 has been complied with by the respondents. In view of the same, the contempt petition is closed. Connected applications, if any, shall stand closed. Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ub ToMUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR ,J.ub...
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co Ltd REP BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGN ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.06.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited Registered office at : 'Chola Crest', C54 & 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate Guindy, Chennai-600032, Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr.D.Arjun .. Applicant vs.1. M/s.Saravana Sastha Steels Pvt Ltd No.36 B Phase I SIPCOT Industrial Complex Hosur, Krishnagiri 635 126.2. M/s.Umashankar Alloys Private Limited No.39 Phase II SIPCOT Industrial Complex Hosur, Krishnagiri 635 109.3. M/s.Yees Vee Press Components No.2 529 Lakshmi Narashimma Nagar Railway Station Road, Dinnur Hosur Krishnagiri 635 109.4. M/s.Sasta Traders No.A19, 4th Cross TVS Nagar Cattle Farm Hosur Krishnagiri 635 109.5. M.NandhaKumar6. V.Muthukrishnan7. M.Senthilkumar8. M.Kannikavathi ...RespondentsPRAYER: Arbitration Applications filed under Order XIV Rule 8 Original Side Rules read with Section 9(ii)(d) & (e) of the Arbitr...
P.S.Saravanan Vs N.S.Srinivasan and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
A.No.2683 of 2025 in O.P.No.58 of 2018K.KUMARESH BABU,J.This application has been filed to permit the petitioner to amend the petition by including the name AKZO NOBEL INDIA LIMITED b.TATA CHEMICALS LIMITED instead of HINDLEVER CHEMICALS LIMITED and STEPAN CHEMICALS LIMITED in the schedule of securities and consequently direct the Registry to amend the Succession Certificate issued on 10.10.2018.2.Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.3. Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this application and being satisfied with the same, the application is ordered as prayed for.Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to carry out necessary amendments to the petition within a period of two (2) weeks from today. On the amendments being carried out the Registry shall amend the certificate granted in accordance with law. Gba 30.06.2025 Page No. 1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Thangavel vs Subbulakshmi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI K.Thangavel ... Petitioner Vs. Subbulakshmi ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed in I.A. No.3 of 2023 in H.M.O.P. No.517 of 2020 on the file of the Family Court, Tiruppur, dated 19.06.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.T.Annamalai for Mr.S.RajkumarORDERThe husband has filed the present revision challenging the order of interim maintenance in I.A. No.3 of 2023 taken out by the respondent/wife in HMOP. No.517 of 2020. The wife has sought for interim maintenance of Rs.25,000/-. The wife has alleged that the petitioner doing real estate business and also carrying on profession of Tailor. The petitioner/husband has contested the Application and stating that the petitioner has purchasedproperties in the name of the respondent/wife and the respondent is getting rental income not les...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »