Chennai Orders Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
THE GENERAL MANAGER Vs The Special Deputy Commissioner of Labor
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN in W.A.Sr.No.40240 of 20251. The General Manager Metropolitan Transport Corporation Chennai Ltd Pallavan Illam Anna Salai Chennai 600 002 Appellant(s) Vs1. The Special Deputy Commissioner of G. Kolappadhas (Died).Respondent(s) PRAYER: To condone the delay of 1035 days in filing the Writ Appeal against the order passed in Writ Petition no.29405 of 2013 dated 11.04.2022. For Appellant(s): Mr.R.Raman Laal, Additional Advocate General Assisted By Mr.C.Gauthamaraj For The Appellant. For Respondent(s): Ms.L.Meenakshi For R2 To R4. R-1 The Special Deputy Commissioner Of Labor R-2 Ajitha R-3 K.A. Archana R-4 K.A. Dhivya *****ORDER(Order of the Court was made by R.Subramanian J.) This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 1035 days in filing the above appeal.2. We are not happy with the reasons that have been cited as sufficient cause f...
The State of Tamil Nadu vs Parthiban Prashanth a
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP.No.7239 of 2025 in WA.SR.No.40523 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR, J.In view of the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petition, delay stands condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered, accordingly, (S.M.S., J.) (K.R.S., J.) 30.04.2025 veda Note:Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.JAYASUDHA Vs The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN1. S.Jayasudha2. K.Janakiram ... PetitionersVs The State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Chennai. ... Respondent Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.N.S., to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners without due process of law based on a false complainant. For Petitioners : Mr..Ragu For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners without due process of law based on a false complainant.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that there is no petition or enquiry is pending as against the petitioners herein.3. Recording the aforesaid submission, this criminal original petition is closed. Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation/Yes/No kv To1. The Inspector of Police, Chennai.2. The Public Prosec...
V.Sagunthala vs M.Padmavathy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA V.Sagunthala ... Petitioner Vs. 1.M.Padmavathy 2.S.Bhuvaneswari ... Respondents Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the Additional District and Sessions Judge III at Poonamallee to conduct the speedy trial and dispose the original suit in OS.No.489 of 2024 within a time frame fixed. For Petitioner : M/s.N.ElayarajaORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the above Civil Revision Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Index : Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No To 1.The Additional District and Sessions Judge III at Poonamallee P.T. ASHA. J.,...
The Chairman Cum Managing Director Vs K. Dharmalingam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
C.M.P.No.9986 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.42244 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN, J.Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 103 days in re-presenting the above appeal is condoned.2. The Registry is directed to number the appeal and list it for admission on 02.06.2025. (R.S.M., J.) (G.A.M., J.) 30.04.2025 dsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Vasanthanayagan, Vs Senthamizh Selvan,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Cont.Petn. No.1036 of 2025 K.Vasanthanayagan ... Petitioner Vs. Senthamizh Selvan, Land Surveyor, Office of Revnue Thasildar, Thirukkovilur, Kallakurichi District 605 751 ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for having wilfully disobeyed theorder dated 20.09.2024 made in W.P.No.27628 of 2024.For petitioner : Mr.L.Ramanathan For Respondent : Mr.A.Anandan, Govt. Adv.ORDERToday, when the mater is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the order under contempt was complied with.2. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Government Advocate, this contempt petition is closed. Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No mstS.SOUNTHAR, J.mst Cont.Petn.No.1036 of 2025...
Mr. V. Jagan, Vs Tmt. Kalaiselvi Mohan, I.A.S., and 3 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR V.Jagan ... Petitioner Vs 1.Mrs.Kalaiselvi Mohan, I.A.S., District Collectorate,2. Mr.S.Venkatesah, District Revenue Officer,3. Mr.Ashik Ali, Revenue Divisional officer,4. Mrs.Malarvizhi, Tahsildar, Wallajabad, Kancheepuram District 631 605. ... RespondentsPrayer:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act to punish the respondents herein for having committed contempt of the Orders of this Court dated 29.07.2024 passed in W.P.No.20896 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mrs.A.Jagadeeswari For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendan, Special Government PleaderN.SATHISH KUMAR, J.vrcORDERHeard Mrs.A.Jagadeeswari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.2. When the matter is taken up today, the learned SpecialGovernment Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the Order of this ...
Dharani Vs A.G.S.Balasundaram and 6 Others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Mrs.Dharani Petitioner vs. 1.Mr.A.G.S.Balasundaram 2.Mr.Bathmanathan @ Baskar 3.Mrs.Indrani 4.Mrs.Hemalatha Sridhar 5.Mrs.R.Vasantha 6.Mrs.R.Komalavalli 7.Mr.R.Naresh Kumar ...Respondents PRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 222 & 276 of Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 under Order XXV, Rule 5 of O.S. Rules, praying that she may be allowed to prove the Will in common form, and that probate therefore, to have effect throughout the whole of State of Tamil Nadu, may be granted to her. For Petitioner : Mr. C. Balaji For Respondents : M/s.M.Janaki (For R1 & R3) R2 Set exparte Mr.T.Dhanasekaran (For R4 to R7)ORDERThis Original Petition has been filed for issuance of Probate for the Last Will and testament dated 22.03.2013 executed by Late.Mr.A.G.S.Kalyanasundaram, who died on 16.03.2014. The petitioner has been appointed as executor under the Will.2. The petitioner an...
G.Rengan Vs K.Jayalakshmi and 3 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU G.Rengan Petitioner vs. 1.K.Jayalakshmi 2.K.Vinodh Gopinath 3.Prabha Krishnan 4.Surendra Mohan Krishnan ...Respondents PRAYER: Original Petition filed for Probate under Sections 222 and 276 of Indian Succession Act and Order XXV Rule 4 of the High Court Original Side Rules, praying that he may be allowed to prove the Will in common form, and that probate thereof, to have effect throughout the Union of India may be granted to the petitioner. For Petitioner : M/s.N.K.Kanthimathi For Respondents : Mr.K.MohandassORDERThis Original Petition has been filed for issuance of Probate for the Last Will and testament dated 13.06.2017 executed by Late.Mr.G.Krishnan, who died on 14.02.2021. The petitioner has been appointed as executor under the Will.2. The petitioner is the younger brother of the testator and the 1strespondent is the wife, the 2nd and 4th respondents are the sons and the 3rd res...
Panneerselvam Vs Shajahan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Pannerselvam ... Petitioner Vs Mr.Shajahan, Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.Revenue Divisional Officer, Kirshnagiri, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondent Prayer:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the Order of this Court dated 07.06.2024 passed in W.P.No.14613 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ilayaperumal For Respondent : Mr.A.Selvendan, Special Government PleaderN.SATHISH KUMAR, J.vrcORDERHeard Mr.A.Ilayaperumal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.2. When the matter is taken up today, the learned SpecialGovernment Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that the Order of this Court has been complied and he has also produced a copy of the proceedings dated 22.04.2025 passed by the respondent.3. Reco...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »