Chennai Orders Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vellamalayan (died) Vellaiyan (Died), 1.Nadupillai Vs Muthammal (died) ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
C.M.P.No. 8305 of 2025 inT.V. THAMILSELVI, J.The above Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking a direction to declare the petitioners 7, 8 and 17 viz., Ramsami, Suguna and Soundar as major in the above appeal and to discharge the 14th petitioner/Guardian Mrs.Pappathi, from the guardianship of minors in the above Second Appeal.2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learnedcounsel appearing for petitioners/appellants submitted that, at the time of filing appeal, the petitioners 7, 8 and 17 were minors and now, they attained majority. Hence, this petition has been filed to declare them as major and also to discharge 14th petitioner from the guardianship.3. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title. rppT.V.THAMILSELVI, J.rpp C.M.P.No.8305 of 2025 in (2/2)...
The State of Tamil Nadu vs Dr.Sangkavi R
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP.No.4078 of 2025 in WA.SR.No.22250 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR, J.In view of the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, filed in support of the petition, delay stands condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered, accordingly. (S.M.S., J.) (K.R.S., J.) 30.04.2025 veda Note: Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Venkatakrishna Rao vs Vanamala Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP.No.5717 of 2025 in AS.SR.No.23186 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR, J.The Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 223 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. The learned Counsel for the respondent raised objection that the reasons stated in the affidavit to condone the delay is insufficient.3. However, this Court is of the considered opinion that the delay of 223 days cannot be construed as enormous warranting rejection.4. Thus, delay stands condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered, accordingly. (S.M.S., J.) (K.R.S., J.) 30.04.2025 veda Note:Registry is directed to number the appeal suit, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Akurati Nagarjuna vs the State Rep by ,the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.M.P.No.4276 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.20460 of 2024 Akurati Nagarjuna ...Petitioner/Accused Vs. State rep by 1.Inspector of Police, T-16, Semmancherry Police Station, Chennai. 2.R.Arumugam ...Respondents PRAYER: This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 483(3) BNSS, pleased to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the second respondent herein in Crl.O.P.No.20460 of 2024, dated 29.08.2024. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Ramesh For R1 : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal side) For R2 : M/s.R.KrishnamurthyORDERThis instant petition has been filed seeking cancellation of the ordergranting anticipatory bail to the second respondent in Crl.O.P.No.20460 of Page No.1 of 62024. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court while granting anticipatory bail had directed the second respondent to deposit a sum of Rs.37,00,000/- to the credit of Crime No.1...
S.N.S.Nachimuthu Mudaliyar vs a/M Bava Ousha Deeswararswamy Thirukovil
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN C.M.P No.6539 of 2020 in S.A No.323 of 2020 S.N.S.Nachimuthu Mudaliyar ...Petitioner Vs. Arulmigu Bava Ousha Deewara Swami Tirukovil Represented by its Executive Officer Thiruthuraipoondi Town and Post Thiruturaipoondi District. ...Respondent Prayer: This civil miscellaneous petition is filed to stay all further proceedings in O.S No.10 of 2012 dated 20.02.2017 on the file of District Munsif, Thiruturaipoondi. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.R.Karthikeyan A.A.NAKKIRAN,J umaORDERThis miscellaneous petition was filed in the year 2020. Thereafter, the matter has been kept pending without any interim order, till this date. In the said circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending at this length of time and hence, the same is closed. 30.04.2025 uma (1/3) Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To The...
Kantha vs Unnamalai Ammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP NO. 13977 of 2021IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN1. Kantha2. Yasoda3. Santha4. Kumar5. Geetha6. Lalitha Petitioner (s) Vs1. Unnamalai Ammal2. Moorthy3. Arumugam4. Mani Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s): V.R.Annagandhi For Respondent(s):Mr.R.KarthikeyanORDERHeard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.2. This miscellaneous petition was filed in the year 2021. Notice through court aswell as privately was ordered by this court on 08.09.2021 and thereafter the same has been kept pending till this date without any orders. In the said circumstances, noA.A.NAKKIRAN, J.msr useful purpose will be served in keeping this miscellaneous petition pending, at this length of time and hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Msr 30-04-2025 To1. The Prl. Sub Judge, Krishnagiri2. The District Munsif, Krishnagiri...
R.Thavamani vs R.Durai
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN R.Thavamani ..Petitioner in both the cases Vs. K. Prabha ...Respondent in both the cases Prayer in C.M.P.No.4807 of 2022 : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is AS.No.18 of 2016 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri in OS.No.140 of 2012 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Dharmapuri. Prayer in C.M.P.No.4891 of 2022 : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is AS.No.19 of 2016 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri in OS.No.144 of 2012 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Dharmapuri. For Petitioner in both the cases : Mr.V.Sakkarapani For Respondent in both the cases : Mr.N.Manokaran A.A.NAKKIRAN.,J gvCOMMON ORDERThese miscellaneous petitions were filed in the year 2022. Thereafter, these matters have been kept pending without any interim order, till this date. In the said circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping these petitions pending at this l...
N.Abul Fazal vs P.a.Fariah Faizal and 5 Others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON PRONOUNCED ON15.04.2025 30.04.2025CORAM :THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU A.No.1332 of 2024 in C.S.No.84 of 2023 Mr.N.Abul Fazal Applicant/Plaintiff vs. 1.Mrs.P.A.Fariah Faizal 2.Ms.Fazeela Zennath 3.Ms.Fahmida Zulfa 4.Mr.Naleem Fahdi 5.Mr.N.Afzal 6.Mrs.N.Benazir Respondents/Defendants For Applicant : Mr.M.A.Abdul Wahab For Respondent : Mr.J.Chandran Sundar Sashikumar for RR1-5 No Appearance for R6ORDERThis instant application has been filed to direct the first respondent/1stdefendant to deposit the income derived from the Suit Schedule Property by way of monthly rental income from 12.05.2022 along with the advance of Rs.1,30,000/- till the date of order and continue to deposit the monthly rental income from the date of order to the credit of the above suit in C.S.No.84 of 2023, pending disposal of the above suit.2) Heard Mr.M.A.Abdul Wahab, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and Mr.J.Chandran Sun...
J.Matheswaran vs P.Jamuna
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI S/o. James, Door No. 9-A, CSI Street, Nasiyanur, Erode District. Vs W/o. Parameswaran Door No. 23/11 CSI Street, Nasiyanur, Erode District. SA SR NO. 122490 of 2023 Vs For Appellant(s): Mr.T.M.HariharanORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 507 days in representing the appeal.T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.mps 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.On being satisfied with the averments assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Hence, the delay is condoned. 30-04-2025 mps Note to office:Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list this matter on 24.06.2025....
Ramasamy Gounder vs Kaliammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Ramasamy Gounder S/o.Karupanna Gounder, res at Vellalapatti, District and 2 Others Vs KALIAMMAL W/o.Kandasamy gounder, res at Vellalapatti, District and 3 Others SA SR NO. 82861 of 2021 KALIYAMMAL Vs RAMASAMY For Appellant(s) : Mr.Krishna Prasad R for M/s. Sarvabhauman AssociatesT.V.THAMILSELVI, J.mpsORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 958 days in paying the deficit court fee of Rs.30/- in the appeal. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.On being satisfied with the averments assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Hence, the delay is condoned. 30-04-2025 mps Note to office:Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list this matter on 23.06.2025....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »