Chennai Orders Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abirami Kalyanasundaram, Vs Mr. S. Sakthivel
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in O.P.No.860 of 2016Abirami Kalyanasundaram, D/o.N.Kalayanasundaram, L-1, Rohini Gardens, Santhome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028. Applicant(s) Vs Mr. S. Sakthivel S/o.Dr.R.Sundaravadivelu, Flat No.10-H, Block No.2, Ramaniyam Sanjivni Apartments 72/1, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai, L.B.Road, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai 600 041. Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.Aravind Subramanian (Senior Counsel) For M/s.Nathan and AssociatesFor Respondent(s): No appearanceORDERThere is no representation on the side of the respondent.2. Pursuant to the orders of this Court, the Passport of the minor child had been deposited with the learned Additional Master - I and the same has been kept in bundle.3. The present application had been taken out for having interim custody of the Passport for enabling the minor child to travel to UK during his summer vacation.4. Mr.Aravind Subramaniam, learned S...
B.Baskar Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by The Deputy Superintendent o ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN B.Baskar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, 3.A.Rajkumar .. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to call for the records pertaining to FIR No.111 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Pudhu Nagar Police Station, Cuddalore and quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.K.Ramani For Respondents For R1 & 2 : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in FIR No.111 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Pudhu Nagar Police Station,2. The learned Government Advocate(crl.side) appearing forrespondents 1 & 2 submitted that after completing investigation in crime No.111 of 2025 on the file of the second respondent police, the aforesaid FIR was closed as mistak...
M/S S K Brothers vs the Deputy State Tax Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 29.04.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY & W.M.P.Nos.17356 & 17357 of 2025 M/s.S K Brothers, Rep by its Partner, Ashwin Bagdi, No.38/13, Lakshmi Estates, Errabalu Chetty Street, Parrys, Chennai 600 001 ... Petitioner Vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer, Broadway Assessment Circle, No.32, Integrated Commercial Taxes Office Complex, Room No.305, 3rd Floor, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Vepery, Chennai 600 003 ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in GSTIN 33AAAFS9316F1ZE/2018-19 and quash the order dated 29.04.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.P.V.Sudakar For Respondent : Ms.P.Selvi, Government AdvocateORDERThis writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned orderdated 29.04.2024 passed by the respondent.2. Ms.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on beha...
T.M. Hotels Private Limited vs the Joint Commissioner of GST and Centr ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ T.M. Hotels Private Limited Rep. by its Director, T.Murugesan, No.48A, Mettu Street, Kancheepuram 631 501. Appellant(s) Vs Respondent(s)Prayer: Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside orderdated 24.09.2024 passed by the learned Judge in WP No.3959 of 2022. For Appellant(s): Mr.Joseph Prabakar For Respondent(s): A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing CounselJUDGMENT(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) After the appeal was heard for some time, counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a statutory appeal before the appellate authority. Counsel stated that in view of the pendency of this appeal, appellant may have exceeded the time permitted to file the statutory appeal and that period be condoned.2. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file the statutoryappeal. If the statutory...
V. Vignesh Vs Mr. T. Jayakumar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
Sub.Appl.No.552 of 2025 in Cont.P.No.3663 of 2024 N.SATHISH KUMAR.J., This application is filed to reopen the above contempt petition which was closed on 24.01.2025. This application is ordered. 29.04.2025 dhk Note: Registry is directed to list the contempt today. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
G. Rajiv Gandhi, Vs Mr. T. Jayakumar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
Sub.Appl.No.553 of 2025 in Cont.P.No.3664 of 2024 N.SATHISH KUMAR.J., This application is filed to reopen the above contempt petition which was closed on 24.01.2025. This application is ordered. 29.04.2025 dhk Note: Registry is directed to list the contempt today. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.a.Ravichandran vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI IN Petitioner(s) Vs Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District-602 001. and 5 Others Respondent(s) Vs For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.L. Sudarsanam For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Surendran for R1 to R5, AGP S.L. Sudarsanam C.P.Hemkumar R.Gokul R.VelmuruganORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in the order dated 14.10.2024 made in W.P.No.29440 of 2024 in paragraph no.5, this Court has issued direction to the second respondent instead of issuing direction to the third respondent and prayed for appropriate orders. 2.In view of the above, in the order dated 14.10.2024 made in W.P.No.29440 of 2024 in paragraph no.5, the relevant portion is to be read as follows: '......... this Court directs the third respondent to consider the petitioners last representation......................'. 3.Registry is directed to carry out the said modification in the order dated 14.10.2024 made...
B.Suganthi vs the Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN B.Suganthi ... Petitioner Vs. 4.Bhoopalan ..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the first For Petitioner : Mr.Velmurugan For R1 to R3 : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (crl.side).ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first2. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court.3. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit that pursuant to the complaint lodged by the petitioner, a detailed enquiry was conducted and thereafter, the complaint was closed.4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (crl.side), this Writ Petition stands closed. No costs.Speaking/non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No shk To 4.Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.shk...
S.RAJENDRAN (DIED) 1.S.MANI Vs Dhanalakshmi Ammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
CMP.No.10896 of 2025 in A.S.SR.No.139850 of 2023N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 519 days in paying the deficit Court Fee of Rs.33,314/- in the above appeal.2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection in allowing this petition.3. Considering the nature of thereasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with this petition and taking note of the dispute between the parties, this petition is Ordered and the delay is condoned. 29.04.2025 vrc https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Juvenile M.Shree Mathesh vs the Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Juvenile M.Shree Mathesh Rep. By his natural guardian/mother, K.Fathima ... Petitioner Vs. RA Puram, Thideer Nagar, Chennai 600 028 .. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and her minor son, who is a juvenile. For Petitioner : M/s.Chennai Law Associates For Respondents : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking direction to the second respondent not to harass the petitioner, who is a juvenile.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents police submits that no FIR or complaint is pending against the petitioner on the file of the respondents police.3. Recording the above submission, this Criminal OriginalPetition is closed. It is made clear that since no compl...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »