Chennai Orders Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Paul Inbanathan Vs The State, Rep. by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Paul Inbanathan Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police, Kangeyam Police Station, Respondent Crime No. 576 of 2025. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vijayaragavan Marimuthu For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition. The learned counsel has made an endorsement and hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. drl 29-04-2025 To1. The Inspector Of Police, Kangeyam Police Station, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. SUNDER MOHAN J. drl 29.04.2025...
Kirupavathy Died vs Daniel Ulriksson
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI SA NOs. 768, 769, 770. 771 & 883 OF 2012 Vs SA No. 769 of 2012 Vs SA No. 770 of 2012 Vs SA No. 883 of 20121. John MickleS/o Late Karunakaran (kirupavathi - Died) D/o Late Karunakaran 4.K.Gabriel Devavaram S/o Late Karunakaran, All Are At D.No.2/156, Thilak Nagar, Unjavelampatty, Pollachi Tk Vs1. Daniel Ulriksson S/o Jonas Ulricy, Rep By His Regd Poa Dr.Vijayan.S/o R.Pelvaendram, No27, Venkateswara Colony, Pollachi SA No. 771 of 2012Vs SA No. 768 of 2012 For Appellant(s): M/s T.Gnana Banu 2023/10 G.Gubendhiran 961/11 A.Hashika 1541/20 K.V.Gopinath 7193/21 M.Yogalakshmi 8112/23 R.Rasiah 525/24 For Appellants Memo Filed By The Appellant M/s T.gnanabanu G.Gubendhiran For Respondent(s): M/s.L.Palanimuthu Meenakshi Ganesan For Sole Respondent Memo Filed By The Counsel For Respt M/s L.Palani MuthuCOMMON JUDGMENTWhen these matters came up on 23.04.2025, there was no representation on beh...
A.Nepolean vs Ranganathan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate : 29.04.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN A.Nepolean ...Petitioner in C.M.P.No.6126/2020 Amirthalingam ...Petitioner in C.M.P.No.6376/2020 Vs. 1.Ranganathan2. Selvakumari ...Respondents in both the cases Prayer in CMP.No.6126/2020: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filedthe petitioners possession and enjoyment of the suit B schedule properties morefully described in the schedule and forming the subject matter of the suit in OS.No.394 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Cuddalore. Prayer in CMP.No.6376/2020: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed the petitioners possession and enjoyment of the suit properties morefully described in the schedule and forming the subject matter of the suit in OS.No.318 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Cuddalore. For Petitioners in both the cases : Mr.P.Mani For Respondents in both the cases :Mr.T.S.BaskaranCOMMON ORDERThese miscellaneous pe...
HDB Financial Services Limited Vs KSK Infratech Rep by its Proprietor
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb Appln No. 370 of 2025 M/. HDB Financial Services Limited, Having one of its branch office at 4th floor, Loyal Towers, No.68/2, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory ..Applicant Vs1. KSK Infratech, rep. by its Proprietor, No. 145, 5th Cross winfield garden, Srirampura Village Yelahanaka Hobli Bangalore, North bangalore - 560 064 Karnataka.2. Smitha S Kumar, Karnataka3. Kumar K.S., Karnataka ..Respondents For Applicant: Mr.M.Arunachalam Ms.G.Sampath Rekha,Advocate CommissionerORDERThis Court, by its earlier order dated 02.04.2025, had made it clear that if the vehicle/asset is not repossessed by the Advocate Commissioner on or before the next hearing date, this application shall stand automatically closed by granting liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner once the vehicle/asset is located.2. Ti...
HDB Financial Services Limited Vs Baskar H
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb Appln No. 372 of 2025 M/. HDB Financial Services Limited, Having one of its branch office at 4th floor, Loyal Towers, No.68/2, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory ..Applicant Vs1. Baskar H, S/o Harikrishnan K. Tamilnadu.2. Hari Krishnan K. S/o Kanniappan,K Tamilnadu. ..Respondents For Applicant: Mr.M.Arunachalam Ms.S.Tamil Selvi,Advocate CommissionerORDERThis Court, by its earlier order dated 02.04.2025, had made it clear that if the vehiclet is not repossessed by the Advocate Commissioner on or before the next hearing date, this application shall stand automatically closed by granting liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner once the vehicle is located.2. Till date, the vehicle is not located. Therefore, as per the order dated02.04.2025 passed by this Court, this Application is closed. Howev...
The Joint Commissioner Region-II Vs Mrs.K.Sankari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
A.No.2177 of 2025 in C.S.No.200 of 2024K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The present Application has been filed to condone the delay of 117 days in filing the written statement.2. Mr.A.R.Nixon, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted he has no objection in allowing this application.3. Heard both sides.4. Considering the averments made inthe affidavit filed in support of this application and also taking into consideration that the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection in allowing this application, the same is ordered as prayed for and the delay is condoned. 29.04.2025 (1/2) kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Viswanathan vs Raman
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND SA NO. 360 OF 2024,CMP NO. 10861 OF 2024 VISWANATHAN S/o. Sanjeevi, Bommanapadi Village, Perambalur Tk. and 17 Others Vs Perambalur. and 14 Others SA NO. 360 of 2024 Perambalur Tk. and another Vs Pechayi (died), Lakshmi (died).1. Easwari W/o. Kamaraj, Kollupattarai Street, Kulithalai, Karur District. and 24 Others CMP NO. 10861 of 2024 Perambalur Tk. and another Vs Pechayi (died), Lakshmi (died).1. Easwari W/o. Kamaraj, Kollupattarai Street, Kulithalai, Karur District. and 24 Others V Kannan A Veerappa SA NO. 360 of 2024C.Prabakaran R.Rajadurai R.Divya Bharathi R.Magesh, B.Keethana J.Shakul Hameed V.KannanA.Veerappa-ms/315/1990Rr1 & 4 - Insufficient AddressR2 - DiedR3 - LeftR13 - No Such PersonRr 18 & 19 - VacatedRr 1, 2, 4, 13 & 18 - DiedVide In Memo Filed In Sr.Sno.7896, Dated: 28.02.2025for rr5 to 12, 14 TO 17 AND 20 to 25 memo filed on behalf of the respts m/s v...
The Managing Director Vs Saravanan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CMP NO. 5190 of 2025 in The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Valuthareddy, Villupuram. Appellant(s) Vs Saravanan S/o. Govindasamy, Dhasskand Nagar, Virudachalam TK, Cuddalore Dist. 606001 Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.S.S.SanthosakumarORDERIn view of the order passed by this court in this petition dated 19.03.2025, this petition stood dismissed automatically and the same is recorded. 29-04-2025 mstS.SOUNTHAR, J.mst 29.04.2025...
Tamil Nadu Housing Board Vs V K Kumar @ V K Sekar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
C.M.P.No.5473 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.30800 of 2025S. M. SUBRAMANIAM,J.ANDK. RAJASEKAR,J.(Order of the court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) This miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 160 days in filing the above appeal in W.A.SR.No.30800 of 2025.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, delay is condoned and this miscellaneous petition stands ordered. [S.M.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 29.04.2025 ssi Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal in W.A.SR.No.30800 of 2025, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.Narayanan, vs the District Collector,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Against W.P.No.23301 of 2012 R.Narayanan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, 3.The Tahsildar, Avinasi Taluk, 4.G.K.Alloys Steels Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director, Avinasi, Velayuthampalayam, Coimbatore District. ... Respondents Prayer: Review application filed under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code praying to review the order dated 19.02.2013 passed in W.P.No.23301 of 2012 by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Surendran for R1 to R3 Additional Government PleaderORDERThis review application has been filed to review the order dated 19.02.2013 passed in W.P.No.23301 of 2012. 2.This Court vide order dated 19.02.2013 observed that nothing survives in the writ petition and the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. Aggrieved by the order, the p...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »