Chennai Orders Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G.Seenivasan vs Kannammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN S.A No.36 of 2021 and CMP No.975 of 2021 G.Seenivasan ...Appellant Vs. 1.Kannammal 2.Sivasaravanan 3.Kavitha 4.Sekaran 5.S.Kathirvel ...Respondents Prayer: This second appeal is filed under Section 100 CPC to set aside thejudgment and decree dated 03.03.2020 made in A.S No.105 of 2019 on thefile of the learned IInd Additional District Court, Erode confirming thejudgment and decree dated 15.06.2019 made in O.S No.32 of 2017 on thefile of the learned Sub Court, Perundurai. For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran for R4 & R5 A.A.NAKKIRAN,J umaJUDGMENTWhen the matter came up for hearing on 29.04.2025, the learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that he had given change of vakalat to the appellant and permit him to withdraw his appearance. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to remove the name of the counsel on record and print the n...
Nsk Bearings India Pvt.Ltd vs Podh Thozhilalar Sangam- Citu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and M/s.NSK Bearings India Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Management, Plot No.A2, SIPCOT Oragadam Growth Centre, Mathur Village, Sriperumpudur Taluk, Kanchipuram District - 602 105. ...Appellant Vs. 1.Podhu Thozhilalar Sangam - CITU Rep. by its General Secretary, S/o. Antony, Reg.No.504/CPT, No.21 B, Vilakkadi Koil Street, Kanchipuram District - 621 501. 2.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, 3.The Commissioner of Labour, 4.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation-I),5.Indian National Engineering Employees Union, Affiiated to INTUC, Rep. by its President, R.Aadhikesavan, Plot No.A2, SIPCOT Oragadam, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kanchipuram District - 602 105. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against theorder dated 29.10.2024 made in W.P.No.9969 of 2023.Fo...
Chinnammal (Died) vs K. Chinnapalanisamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN C.M.P No.2292 of 2021 in S.A No.109 of 2021 Chinnammal(died) 1.K.M.Kumarasamy 2.K.M.Dhandapani ...Petitioners Vs. K.Chinnapalanisamy ...Respondent Prayer: This civil miscellaneous petition is filed to grant an order of interim injunction restraining the respondent not to alienate the suit schedule property in O.S No.292 of 2006 on the file of II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore, pending disposal of the above second appeal. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Guruprasad For Respondents : Mr.I.Abrar Md. Abdullah A.A.NAKKIRAN,J umaORDERIn this miscellaneous petition, an interim order was granted on 16.02.2021. Thereafter, the matter has been kept pending till now. Hence, the interim order already granted is made absolute and this miscellaneous petition is ordered accordingly. 30.04.2025 uma Index:Yes/No (2/3)Speaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To The II Additional Sub...
K.M.Kumarasamy vs Chinnammal(Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN C.M.P No.2289 of 2021 in S.A No.108 of 2021 1.K.M.Kumarasamy 2.K.M.Dhandapani ...Petitioners Vs. Chinnammal(died) Chinnapalanisamy ...Respondents Prayer: This civil miscellaneous petition is filed to grant an order of ad- interim injunction restraining the respondent, his men, and agents from in any way interfering in the suit schedule property which is the subject matter in O.S No.297 of 2005 on the file of II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore, pending disposal of the above second appeal. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Guruprasad For Respondents : Mr.I.Abrar Md. Abdullah A.A.NAKKIRAN,J umaORDERIn this miscellaneous petition, an interim order was granted on 16.02.2021. Thereafter, the matter has been kept pending till now. Hence, the interim order already granted is made absolute and this miscellaneous petition is ordered accordingly. 30.04.2025 uma Index:Yes/No (1/3)Speaking/Non-speaking...
The State of Tamilnadu vs S Ravichandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
C.M.P.No.903 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.2974 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN, J.Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 344 days in filing the above appeal is condoned. (R.S.M., J.) (G.A.M., J.) 30.04.2025 dsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Shakuntala Mohunta vs Ramkishen
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate :30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN C.M.P. No.3497 of 2022 in Shakuntala Mohunta ...Petitioners Vs. 1.Ramkishen Harichand (died)2. Giridharilal3. Narayandas4. Anand5. Krishna Devi6. Bina Ghanshyamdas7. Duru Gunalan8. Rama Suresh9. M/s.G.K.Enterprises Rep by its Partner Giridhar Hemdev No.303/C, Shivalaya Buildings Commander in Chief Road, Egmore, Chennai 8.10. Giridher Hemdev11. M/s.Kanyalal SrichandRep by its Partner, Srichand Kanyalal Commander-in-chief Road, Egmore, Chennai 8. ...Respondents Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking an injunction restraining the respondents 1 to 8 from conveying any undivided share of interest in the suit property to any 3rd parties in OS.No.1285 of 1988 on the file of the XII Assistant City Civil Court,A.A.NAKKIRAN msr Chennai. For Petitioners : Mr.T.S. Baskaran For Respondents : Ms.J.Dyana for R3 to R8ORDERHeard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned...
Vellamalayan (died) Vellaiyan (Died), 1.Nadupillai Vs Muthammal (died) ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
inT.V. THAMILSELVI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to accept the cause title of the petitioners in the above second appeal.2. Mr.G.Ilamurugu, learned counsel for petitioners submitted that atthe time of filing appeal, some of the petitioners were minors and now, they have attained majority. Hence, it is just and necessary to file the present petition praying to accept the cause title.3. Considering the facts and circumstances, and being satisfied withthe reasons assigned in the affidavit as justifiable one, this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title and to number the above Second Appeal if it is otherwise found to be in order and post the matter on 16.06.2025. rppT.V.THAMILSELVI, J.rpp in (1/2)...
P. Anandan and another Vs Dr. P. Senthil Kumar, I.A.S and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 30.04.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN 1.P.Anandan 2.M.Subramani ...Petitioners Vs. 1.Dr.P.Senthil Kumar, IAS., Additional Chief Secretary, 2.Srinivas R.Reddy, IFS., The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Chennai 600 032 ...Respondents PRAYER: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience in not complying with the order dated 09.07.2024 passed by this Court in WP.No.10532 of 2024. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Mani For Respondents : Mr.M.Murali, Government AdvocateORDERThis contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience in not complying with the order dated 09.07.2024 passed by this Court in WP.No.10532 of 2024, thereby the respondents were directed to notionally regularise the petitioner as Forest Watcher with effect from 24.01.1995 for the purpose of revised pension, within a time frame.2....
K. Arunagiri, Vs Dr. P. Senthil Kumar, I.A.S., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 30.04.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN K.Arunagiri ...Petitioner Vs. 1.Dr.P.Senthil Kumar, IAS., Additional Chief Secretary to Government, 2.Srinivas R.Reddy, IFS., The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Chennai 600 032 ...Respondents PRAYER: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience in not complying with the order dated 09.07.2024 passed by this Court in WP.No.2610 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mani For Respondents : Mr.M.Murali, Government AdvocateORDERThis contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience in not complying with the order dated 09.07.2024 passed by this Court in WP.No.2610 of 2024, thereby the respondents were directed to notionally regularise the petitioner as Forest Watcher with effect from 24.01.1995 for the purpose of revised pension, within a time frame.2. The...
R.Kannan vs V.Raju Devar(Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN C.M.P No.3770 of 2020 in S.A No.185 of 2020 1.R.Kannan 2.R.Munusamay 3.R.Sakthivel ...Petitioners Vs. V.Raju Devar (died) ...RespondentPrayer: This civil miscellaneous petition is filed to pass an order of interim injunction restraining the respondent, her men, agent or any other persons acting through her, from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property in O.S No.80 of 2011 on the file of Additional Sub Judge, Chengalpet, by the petitioners/appellants herein, pending disposal of the above second appeal.For Petitioners : Mr.M.Murugesan For Respondent : No representation A.A.NAKKIRAN,J umaORDERThis miscellaneous petition was filed in the year 2020. Thereafter, the matter has been kept pending without any interim order, till this date. In the said circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending at this length of time and hen...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »