Chennai Orders Court March 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr.S.Selvakumar, AGE-56 Vs Dr.J.Radhakrishnan,IAS
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR1. Dr.S.Selvakumar2. N.Yamuna3. Sivaporkodi4. N.Thenmozhi ... Petitioners Vs Dr.J.Radhakrishnan, IAS., Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai 600 003. ... RespondentPrayer:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying the Order made in W.P.No.25441 of 2023 dated 30.08.2023. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Raja For Respondent : Mr.R.Ramanlal, Additional Advocate General Asst. By Mr.S.GopinathanN.SATHISH KUMAR, J.vrcORDERHeard Mr.K.Raja, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.R.Ramanlal, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent.2. When the matter is taken up today, the learned Advocate General submitted that Order has been passed by the Government, rejecting the request of the petitioners.3. Recording the submissions of the learned Additional Advocate Gen...
G.Meena Vs G.Ravanan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and CMP.No.7731 of 2025 G.Meena ... Petitioner Vs. 1.G.Ravanan 2.Sumathi Mohan Kumar 3.Balaji 4.The Sub Registrar Pallavaram SRO 5.The Thasildar Taluk Office at Sholinganallur Sholinganallur Taluk Kancheepuram District. 6.The District Collector Kancheepuram Kancheepuram District. ... Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records relating to O.S.No.61 of 2015 renumbered as O.S.No.10 of 2024 pending on the file of District Munsifcum Judicial Magistrate, Sholinganallur, to strike off the same and pass further orders. For Petitioner : Mr.R.N.Amarnath For Respondents : Mr.V.Ramesh Government Advocate [R4 to R6]ORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty to file an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, before...
M.Varatharaj vs the Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-03-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P. NO. 11305 of 2025 M.Varatharaj .. Petitioner Vs1. The Collector, O/o. Collector Office, 2.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. Superintendent of Police Office, 3.The Inspector of Police, Poolampatti Police Station, Edappadi Taluk, Salem District. .. RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, directing the respondents to provide immediate and adequate protection to the petitioner and his family from threats, harassment and intimidation by the petitioner's uncles, their sons, and their associates; to consequently conduct a thorough, impartial, and time- bound investigation into the threats, harassment and intimidation faced by the petitioner and his family and take appropriate legal action, including the arrest of the accused within a time frame stipulated by this Hon'ble Court to ...
The Government of Tamilnadu vs V.K.Sattanathan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
CMP No.4569 of 2025 in WA SR No.23993 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN, J.Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is ordered, the delay of 167 days in filing the Appeal is condoned. [R.S.M., J.] [G.A.M., J.] 28.03.2025 jv https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/1...
Anjalam vs the State Represented by Its
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR and W.M.P.No.7528 of 2025 Anjalam ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep. by its, Salem. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records pertaining to the Impugned Order bearing No.235223/Tha.Ku- and consecutively direct the 1st respondent to grant ordinary leave for 30 days without escort to the detenu namely Ayyandurai, S/o.Balakrishnan,aged about 34 years, bearing Convict No.9696 and PID No.54877 at Central Prison, Salem. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Pandiyan For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester JohnORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorse...
DR.N.C.Pavithra Vs G.Navaneetha Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
A.Nos.948 & 949 of 2025 in O.P.No.337 of 2024K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The present Applications have been filed to reopen and recall the cross examination of P.W.1 respectively.2. Ms.S.Thamizharasi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that she has no objection in allowing this application.3. Heard both sides.4. Considering the averments made inthe affidavit filed in support of this application and also taking into consideration that the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection in allowing this application, the applications in A.Nos.948 and 949 of 2025 in O.P.No.337 of 2024 are ordered as prayed for. 28.03.2025 (1/3) kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
B. Victoriajayarani vs B. George Arogiyaraj
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
CMP No.7977 of 2025 W.A.SR.No.174712 of 2024Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.andC.KUMARAPPAN,J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J.) Mr.G.Pavendran, learned counsel for R1 and Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath, learned Government Advocate, who appears for the official respondents do not very seriously object to the condonation of delay of 270 days in filing the Writ Appeal.2. Hence and also for the reasons set out in the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 270 days in filing the Writ Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the Writ Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [A.S.M.,J] [C.K.,J] https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis sl 28.03.2025...
S.Krishnamurthy Vs S.Srinivasan and 9 Others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Mr.S.Krishnamurthy Petitioner vs. 1.Mr.S.Srinivasan 2.Mr.S.Anandan 3.Mrs.N.Santhi 4.Mrs.N.Divya Lakshmi 5.Mrs.N.Janani 6.Mrs.S.Sagunthala 7.Mrs.B.Saraswathi 8.Mrs.I.Uma 9.Mr.M.Ramamurthi 10.Mr.M.Natarajan ...RespondentsPRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 222 & 276 of the Indian Succession Act, XXXIX of 1925; and Order XXV, Rule 4 of O.S. Rules, prays that he may be allowed to prove the Will dated 13.09.1987 in common form, and that Probate thereof limited to the State of Tamil Nadu may be granted to him. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Venkataramani For Respondent : Mr.P.Vasanth (For R3 to R5) No appearance for RR1, R2, R6 to R8, R9 & R10ORDERThis Original Petition has been filed for issuance of Probate for the Last Will and testament dated 13.05.1987 executed by Late.Mrs.G.Danalakshmi, who died on 14.09.2020. The petitioner has been appointed as the only executor under the ...
Masjid - E- Quba vs the Tamilnadu Waqf Board
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA.J and C.M.P.No.5695 of 2020 & 5955 of 2025 Masjid E Quba representation by its Muthavalli, F.Mohammed Suhail, No.302/2, Anbu Nagar, Hasthampatti, Manakadu, Salem 636 007. ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Rep by its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Mannady, Chennai 01. 2.H.Kather Ahamed ... Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order in IA.NO.640 of 2019 in OA.NO.362 of 2019 on the file of the Waqf Tribunal, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr. M.M.I.Khaleel For Respondent : Mr. K.Abdul Owais ----ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the submission and the endorsement made, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions ...
A.Rangasamy vs P.S.Nandhakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and CMP.No.7521 of 2025 1.A.Rangasamy 2.Kanimozhi 3.Rajendran ... Petitioners Vs. 1.P.S.Nandhakumar 2.S.Ravichandran 3.R.Muthu 4.R.Balasubramanian 5.Poongkodi 6.Muthukumar ... Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to struck off the plaint in O.S.No.93 of 2024 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Sathyamangalam and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioners : Mr.C.PrakasamORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty to approach the trial Court. He had also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.2. Recording the submission and the endorsement so made by thelearned counsel for the petitioners, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. This o...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »