Chennai Orders Court March 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.Ramamoorthy vs Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-03-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN and WMP No.5426 of 2025 P.Ramamoorthy Petitioner(s) Vs The Principal Secretary Transport Commissioner, Guindy, Chennai 600-032. Respondent(s)PRAYER :Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the order of the respondent herein passed in his Proc. No 23985/RA1/2023 (E.O.No.776/2024) dated 06.11.2024 rejecting the petitioner's request for temporary relinquishment of promotion as Personal Assistant for the year 2023-2024 and to quash same and consequently direct the respondent herein to pass orders accepting the petitioner's temporary relinquishment of promotion as Personal Assistant for a period of three years in accordance with Section 57(2) of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016.For Petitioner(s): Mr.Ravi Shanmugam, Senior Counsel F...
N.Poongothai vs C.Amirthalakshmi (Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-03-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA N.Poongothai W/o S.Natesan Pooma Complex, No.14, Workshop St., Khaderpet Tiruppur. and 5 Others Appellant(s) Vs C.Amirthalakshmi (died)1. C.A.G.Manoharan S/o Late C.A.GanapathyChettiar, Door No.19, Workshop St., Karianna Gounder St., Khaderpet Tiruppur. and 3 Others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): M/s J.Antony Jesus S.A.Jegan R.Rajasekar For Respondent(s): M/s S.Kaithamalai KumaranORDERBy consent, C.M.P.No.8812 of 2019 is closed. 28-03-2025 (2/2) mtl To 1.C.Amirthalakshmi (died)1. C.A.G.Manoharan S/o Late C.A.Ganapathy Chettiar, Door No.19, Workshop St., Karianna Gounder St., Khaderpet Tiruppur. 2.P.Vijayakumar S/o Palraj No.10, Chithappa Garage, Royapuram Main Road, Royapuram 3.Minor V.A.Krishanth Rep By His Next Friend And Guardian P.Vijayakumar The 2nd Respondent Herein No.10, Chithappa Garage Royapuram Main Road, Royapuram4.Minor V.A.Krishalini Rep. By Her Next Friend And Guardian...
Saravanan vs the State Rep by Its the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Saravanan ...Petitioner Vs. The State rep by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.299 of 2024) .. Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.299 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : M/s.Madhankumar M For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate(Crl.Side)ORDERThis is the third anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner. Page No.1 of 42. Though the earlier anticipatory bail petition of the petitionerwas dismissed by my learned predecessor, Hon'ble Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira, this petition is listed before this Court pursuant to the orders passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.31787 of 2024 on 04.03.2025.3. The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the resp...
N. Kannan, Vs Chief General Manager,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASORDERS RESERVED ON : 24.01.2025 ORDERS PRONOUNCED ON : 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and W.M.P.No.24842 of 2016 N.Kannan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, 10th Floor, 16, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 006. 2.The Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Net Work I, Zone II, Chennai-600 001. 3.The Deputy General Manager & CDO, State Bank of India, HR Department, Local Head Office, 16, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 006.4.The Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Region V, RBO, Puducherry. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 27.07.2015 of the petitioner for promotion to the next higher Grade of SMGS V and above with consequential benefits arising there from by implementing...
Angeline Selvarani Francis vs Nathan Francis Anand Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
C.M.P.No.3944 of 2025 IN C.M.A.SR.No.13571 of 2025R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDK. KUMARESH BABU, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) Notice to the respondent through Court as well as privately returnable in two weeks. Post this matter after two weeks. (R.S.K., J.) (K.B., J.) 26.02.2025 gya https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Ariyarasan and Another Vs Dr.P.Senthil Kumar, I.A.S., and Another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR1. K.Ariyarasan2. s.Pandiyan ... Petitioners Vs1. Dr.P.Senthil Kumar, I.A.S., Additional Chief Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. Dr.Sdhanshu Gupta, I.F.S., Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, [Head of Forest Force], Velachery Main Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. ... Respondents Prayer:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act to punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience in not complying withtheOrder dated 31.08.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.25516 of 2023For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mani For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajesh Government AdvocateN.SATHISH KUMAR, J.vrcORDERHeard Mr.S.Mani, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Rajesh, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent.2. When the matter is taken up today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learn...
Balakrishnan vs Vimala
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE C.M.A.Nos.999 of 2024 & 4802 of 2019 Balakrishnan .. Petitioner in both CMPs Vs. Vimala .. Respondent in both CMPs Prayer in C.M.P.No.4838 of 2025: Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, to condone the delay of 41 days in filing the petition to restore to file the C.M.A.No.999 of 2024, which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 04.12.2024; andPrayer in C.M.P.No.4842 of 2025: Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, to condone the delay of 41 days in filing the petition to restore to file the C.M.A.No.4802 of 2019, which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 04.12.2024. For the Petitioner in both CMPs : Mr.Suyesh Palande For the Respondent in both CMPs : Mr.R.MuralidharanCOMMON ORDER(Order of the Court was authored by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) C.M.A.Nos.999 of 2024 and 4802 of 2019 were posted for he...
Kannan vs Sannasi (Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
These petitions are filed (i) to condone the delay of 572 days infiling the petition to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole respondent (ii) to set-aside the order of abatement caused due to the death of the sole respondent and (iii) to bring on record the respondents 1 to 9 herein as the legal representatives of the deceased sole respondent herein and rank them as respondents 2 to 10 in S.A. No.367 of 2018, respectively.2. Though notices were served on the respondents and their names were also printed in the cause list, there is no representation on their behalf.3. This Court is satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions. Hence, these petitions are allowed. 4.The Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendments in the Second Appeal No.367 of 2018 and list the matter for final hearing after four weeks. mtl mtl...
Kamalaveni vs the State Rep Its
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR Kamalaveni ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Coimbatore District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 40 days to the petitioner's husband Manikandan, S/o.Muniappa Thevar (C.P.No.4969), detained at Central Prison, Madurai. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Paramasivan For Respondents : Mr.S.Raja Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor High Court of MadrasORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learnedcounsel for t...
Muhammed Arshad vs the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANM.Muhammed Arshad Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep. by, Inspector of Police, (Crime No.330 of 2023) Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending trial in C.C. No.96 of 2023 on the file of the Additional District Cases, Coimbatore. For Petitioner : Mr.C.D.Sugumar For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate(Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.05.2023, seeking bail in Crime No.330 of 2023 registered for the offences under Sections 8(c), 22(c) & 29(1) of the NDPS Act, 1985. Page No.1 of 42. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with otherpersons were found in illegal possession of 60 grams of Methamphetamine. Hence, this case. 3.Learned counsel appear...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »