Chennai Orders Court March 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abdul Majeed vs Abdul Rahman
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and CMP.Nos.7809 & 7816 of 2025 Abdul Majeed ... Petitioner in both CRPs Vs.Abdul Rahman ... Respondent in both CRPs Common Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 17.10.2024 passed in CMA.No.32 of 2020 & CMA.No.33 of 2020 respectively on the file of XV Additional City Civil Court at Chennai, confirming the order passed in I.A.No.110 of 2017 dated 15.11.2019 in O.S.No.67 of 2017 and I.A.No.111 of 2017 dated 15.11.2019 in O.S.No.67 of 2017 on the file of VII Assistant City Civil Court at Chennai.For Petitioner : Mr.K.Rajasekaran (in both cases)COMMON ORDERThe defendant in O.S.No.67 of 2019 on the file of City Civil Court is the petitioner before this Court.2. The suit in O.S.No.67 of 2017 is filed by the plaintiff/respondentfor the following reliefs : a) for a permanent injuncti...
B. Lakshmi Prabha, Vs Tmt. kalai Selvi Mohan,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR B.Lakshmi Prabha ... Petitioner Vs Mrs.Kalaiselvi Mohan, District Collector, Kancheepuram District Collectorate, Collectorate Compound, Kancheepuram 631 502. ... Respondent Prayer:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying the Order passed in W.P.No.20989 of 2024 dated 25.07.2024. For Petitioner : Ms.E.Thamizhannai for M/s.Sampathkumaar and Associates For Respondent : Mr.A.Selvendran, Special Government PleaderN.SATHISH KUMAR, J.vrcORDERHeard Ms.E.Thamihannai, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.2. When the matter is taken up today, the learned SpecialGovernment Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that an award has been passed in respect of 150 sq.mtr and the award amount will deposited to the petitione...
T.K.Bharani Tharan vs S.Devipriyanka
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA T.K.Bharani Tharan ... Petitioner Vs. S.Devipriyanka ... Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a direction to dispose HMOP.No.175 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode, Namakkal, within a time frame fixed by this Court by allowing this Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioners : Ms.A.M.Amutha GaneshORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present revision petition. She had also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.2. Recording the submission and the endorsement so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes / No ds To: 1.The Subordinate Judge Tiruchengode, Namakkal. 2.The Section ...
M.Chinnaiyan vs State by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.03.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and Crl.M.P.No.2318 of 2024 M.Chinnaiyan ... Petitioner Vs1. State By The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.123 of 2023)2. K.Ravichandran ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C/ Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the FIR in Cr.No.123 of 2023 on the file of the respondent No.1 police station and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pugalenthi For R1 : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.123 of 2023 pending on the file of first Respondent Police.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for thefirst respondent would submit that the first respondent had completed the investigation in Crime No.123 of 2023 and filed a final report and the same has been taken cognizance in STC.No.353 of 2024, on the...
R.J. Surendranath vs Rakesh Harlalka
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
CMP.No.6402 of 2025 in AS.SR.No.10084 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR,J.(Order of the court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has no objection to condone the delay. Hence, the delay stands condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. [S.M.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 28.03.2025 veda Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal suit, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M/s Thamizhaga cable Telecommunication Limited Vs Additional Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and W.M.P.Nos.4335 & 4336 of 2025 M/s. Thamizhaga Cable Telecommunication Ltd., rep. by its Managing Director, P.Sakilan. ..Petitioner Vs. New Delhi 110 001. Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner's dated 03.01.2025 and thereby, to refer the matter to the fourth respondent as per para 2 (b) (i) read with para 2 (g) of the Instruction No.1/2023-24-GST(INV) (F.No.GST/INV/INSTRUCCTIONS/2023-24) dated 30.03.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Velmurugan For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Pragadish Senior Panel Counseland Mr.T.Navinidhar, Junior Panel CounselOrderThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous, inasmuch as, subsequent ...
Munusamy vs G.Manimegalai
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-03-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN and CRL MP No.14357 of 20241. MUNUSAMY S/o.Govindaswamy, Residing At No.5/4, Chettiyar Thoppu Palamathi Road Sasthri Nagar, Bagayam, Vellore Petitioner(s) Vs1. G.ManimegalaiW/o.G.Muniswamy, Residing At No.28/53, Arasamara Street, Ammur Post, Vellore District. 2.Minor Niranjani Minor Rep By Her Mother Guardian G.Manimegali, Residing At 28/53 Arasamara Street, Ammur Post, Vellore District. Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section438 read with 442 of BNSS, to set aside the order passed in FCMC.No.86 of 2018 dated 29.11.2022 on the file of Family Court, Vellore, Vellore District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Hemanth for M/s.M.P.Jayaprakash For Respondent(s): Not ready in noticeORDERThe petitioner has filed this criminal revision petition challenging theorder dated 29.11.2022 passed in FCMC No.86 of 2018 by the learned Judge,Family Court , Vellore.2. Heard th...
A. Krishnan and another Vs Malini
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.03.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI1. A.Krishnan2. A.Venkatesan ...PetitionersVs. Malini ...Respondent Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 17.10.2022 passed in W.P.No.27626 of 2022. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Selvarajan For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, SGPORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 17.10.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.27626 of 2022..2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that, Page No.1 of 2M.DHANDAPANI, J.rap pursuant to the order passed by this Court, the District Collecotr, Tiruvallur vide proceedings dated 05.01.2017 has issued a direction to the official respondents to implement the same, subsequently, the gate...
C.Leelavathi vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI W.P.No.10849 of 2025 C. Leelavathi Petitioner vs. Thiruvannamalai 606 601 Vengikkal Thiruvannamalai District 606 101 Page Nos.1/47. Kasthuri (Councillor)Thiruvannamalai District Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 especially the fifth respondent, to act on the petitioner's representation dated 06.12.2024 by implementing the order dated 25.05.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16227 of 2023 in pursuance of the order dated 02.08.2023 passed by the first respondent under his proceedings dated 02.08.2023 vide Na.Ka.No.A2/1028567/2023 and thereby, forthwith removal of encroachments / illegal structures as constructed in the form of kitchen/cooking room in the water body (odai poramboke) which is comprised in S.F. No.67/2 of Samuthiram, Nall...
M/s.Superfil Products Ltd Vs The Deputy Tahsildar- cum- Executive Magi ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.No.3420 of 2019 M/s.Superfil Products Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, Mr.S.Narayan, R.S. No.28-8/12, Mangalam Road, Puducherry 605 110. ... Petitioner Vs. 3.Superfil Products Workers Union, Represented by its President, R.S. No.28-8/12, Mangalam Road, Page No.1 of 4 Puducherry 605 110. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records and quash Distraint Order dated 27.12.2017 issued by the Respondent No.1 Deputy Tahsildar-cum-Executive Magistrate, Villianur, Puducherry. For Petitioner : M/s.Uma Vijayakumar For Respondents : Mr.V.Vasanthakumar Additional Government Pleader [R1 & R2] Mr.P.R.Thiruneelakandan [R3] *****ORDERThough the present writ petition is filed challenging the distraintorder dated 27.12.2017 issued by the 1st respondent, which was ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »