Chennai Orders Court February 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Geetha vs M/S.Pridhvu Asset Reconstruction and Securitization
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and W.M.P.Nos.5061, 5062 and 5063 of 20251. Geetha2. Raj Karan SVM3. Sharan Pandian SVM .. Petitioners VsHyderabad-500 084, rep by power of attorney, N.R.K.Chandulal, S/o.Kanaka Sundara Sharma, R/o 8-3-169/147, 501, Niveditha Enclave Sidhartha Nagar, Hyderabad-500 038. .. Respondent Prayer : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records in Crl.M.P.No.1528 of 2016, dated 12.7.2024, which was further extended byorder dated 3.12.2024, on the file of the 1st respondent herein and quashthe same and direct the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate to issue fresh notice to the petitioners in their capacity as the legal heirs of the original borrower by name late S.V.S.Manivannan in respect of the properties morefully described in the schedule to the petiti...
The Workmen Rep. by South vs the Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and The Workmen Rep. by South Chennai V.H.S. Maruthuvamani Anna Thozhir Sangam Regn.No.1858/Mds., 96, L Block, R.K.Nagar, Kuppaimedu, Mandaiveli, Chennai 600 028. ...Petitioner Vs.1. The Presiding Officer,2. The Management, V.H.S. Maruthuvamanai, Adyar, Tharamani, Chennai 600 113. ...RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records from the respondent Industrial Tribunal, Chennai relating to its Award dated 19.12.2011 in I.D.No.55 of 2003 published on 20.01.2012, quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to adjudicate the dispute on merits within a time frame, award costs. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : R1 Tribunal : No Appearance, for R2ORDERWhen the matter was listed for hearing on earlier occasions ie., 05.02.2025, 12.02.2025 and 17.02.2025, none ...
V.Rukmangathan (Died) vs R. Namachivayam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA V.Rukmangathan (Died) 1.V.Nainadurai 2.R.Radha ... Appellants in both appeals ..Vs.. 1.R.Namachivayam 2.Sivalingam ... Respondents in both appeals COMMON PRAYER : Second Appeals filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 09.12.2004 in A.S.No.130 of 2012 and Cross Objection in A.S.No.105 of 2014 on the file of the IIAdditional City Civil Court, Chennai, against the decree and judgmentdated 30.11.2011 in O.S.No.5075 of 2008 on the file of the XIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. In both appeals : For Appellant : No appearance For R1 : No appearanceCOMMON JUDGMENTWhen the matters are taken up for hearing today, there is no representation for the appellant. A perusal of the records shows that the second respondent died long back and till date no steps have been taken by the appellant to implead the legal heirs of the deceased second respondent.2. In view of...
Aisha Vs T. Rajendran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
C.M.P.No.4520 of 2025 IN C.M.A.SR.No.92488 of 2023R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDK. KUMARESH BABU, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to accept the cause title in the above civil miscellaneous appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is accepted and it is ordered. (R.S.K., J.) (K.B., J.) 26.02.2025 gya https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
V. Packiakumar vs the Central Rep by, the Intelligence Officer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
inIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in V. Packiakumar S/o.Velachamy, Plot No.50, Sri Vigneshvara Nagar, No.22/96, Seeni Amman Koil Street, Tondiarpet Chennai - 600 081. Petitioner (s) Vs The Central Rep By, Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s): Mr.R.C.Paul Kanagaraj For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent D.R.I., on alternative days at 10.30 a.m., Page No.1 of 4 in for the period of four months and he shall also appear before the trial Court on every hearings without fail imposed in Crl.O.P.No.24923 of 2024 dated 28.11.2024.2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly imposed by this Court.3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of theoffence, the condition imposed on the petitioner in ...
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax vs Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprakash
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN AND Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Ground Floor, New No. 46, MG Road, Chennai-600034 Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Cetral Circle 2(1) Vs A.P. Srinivas Babu A.N.R. Jayaprathap For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajagopalan, for Mr.M.V.Swaroop CHENNAI For Respondent(s):ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.)1. This petition is filed to condone the delay of 182 days in representing the above appeal.2. Mr.R.Rajagopalan, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing this petition.3. This Court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition.4. Since the delay has been properly explained to the satisfaction of this Court, this petition is ordered. (S.S.SUNDAR J.) (C.SARAVANAN J.) 26-02-2025 To...
Rajasekar vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR in Crl.A.No.144 of 2024 RAJASEKAR S/o. Ramalingam, South Street, Keezhakuppam, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District. Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): M/s. K. Balu For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public ProsecutorORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.S.Ramesh J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdrawn this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (M.S.RAMESH J.)(N.SENTHILKUMAR J.) Anu To M.S.RAMESH J. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR J. CRL MP No. 1721 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.144 of...
Monisha Durairaj vs the Prison Headquarters
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Monisha Durairaj Petitioner Vs1. The Prison HeadquartersOffice Of The Inspector General Of Prisons, Whannels Road, Egmore Chennai 08 2.The Superintendent Coimbatore Central Prison, Dr. Nanjappa Road, Coimbatore 641 018 3.The Jailer District Jail, Gobichettipalayam, Erode 638 452 Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Art.226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take necessaryaction based on the representation dated 12.12.2023 by conducting a detailed enquiry to address the issue that the petitioners husband is denied the rights of under-trial prisoner, basic human rights and held in solitary confinement without any order of court by the prison officers for greed of money thereby abusing their power and indulging in corruption to permit the petitioner the visiting rights to meet her husband and provide the basic ...
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax vs Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprakash
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN AND Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 2(1) Vs M/S. A.P.Srinivas A.N.R. Jayaprathap For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajagopalan for Mr.M.V.Swaroop CHENNAI A.N.R.Jayaprathap For Respondent(s):ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.)1. This petition is filed to condone the delay of 195 days in representing the above appeal.2. Mr.R.Rajagopalan, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing this petition.3. This Court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition.4. Since the delay has been properly explained to the satisfaction of this Court, this petition is ordered. (S.S.SUNDAR J.) (C.SARAVANAN J.) 26-02-2025 To...
M/S.Mk Aromatics Limited vs the Chief Manager and Authorized Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and W.M.P.No.4250 of 2025 MK Aromatics Limited Rep. By its Managing Director, Dr.Mahesh Merchant, Plot No.43-37, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Alathur, Tamil Nadu - 603 110. .. Petitioner Vs Pune - 411 005. .. RespondentsPrayer : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned demand notice dated 19.09.2024 issued in F.No.AX27/ SARFAESI/Demand Notice/2024-25 and the consequent impugned possession notice dated 03.12.2024, both issued by 2nd respondent and the consequent impugned sale notice dated 07.01.2025 issued in F.No.AX27/ SARFAESI/Sale Notice/2024-25 by the 1st respondent and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.Hari RadhakrishnanORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Counsel states petition has become...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »