Chennai Orders Court February 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Management vs the General Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANIThe Management, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., No.12, Thambusamy Salai, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The General Secretary, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Pattali Thozhil Sangam, No.29/11, Kannagi Theru, M.G.R. Nagar, Chennai 600 078. 2.The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Chennai 600 104. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to theorder made in I.D.No.2 of 2009 dated 07.04.2011 on the file of the 2ndrespondent/Industrial Tribunal, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Selvaraj For Respondents : Not Ready Notice [R1] Tribunal [R2] ***** Page No.1 of 10ORDERWhether a model employer could bring about change in promotion rules without taking the workers' unions into confidence, is the core issue to...
Dr.Suresh Kumar P R Vs The Director of Medical and Rural Health Servic ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 27.02.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA and WMP.Nos. 8264, 8265 & 8266 of 2022 Dr.Suresh Kumar P R ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, Chennai- 6.2. The Joint Director of Health Services, Tirupur District, Tirupur. ... RespondentsWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned posting order of the 1st respondent dated 18.03.2022 in Ref No. 12818/E1/3/2022, quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.T.Dharani For Respondents : Mr.E.Sundaram, Government Advocate Page No.1/8ORDERWrit petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 1st respondent dated 18.03.2022 and quash the same.2. The petitioner joined the services of the respondent as an Anaesthecian inthe year 2009. According to the petitioner, there was a disagreement between him and the then C...
S.Dorai Vs The Executive Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD and WMP.Nos.13934 to 13936 of 2020 S.Dorai ... Petitioner vs. Mamallapuram, Chengalpattu District 603 104. Chengalpattu District.3. Vasantha .. RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to Na.Ka.No.85/2019 dated 03.01.2020 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue fresh license to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.S.S.Rajesh For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Rajendiran Addl.Govt.Pleader For R3 : Mr.G.Murugendran Page No.1 of 2J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.kkdORDERToday i.e. 27.02.2025, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the first respondent has already issued fresh license to the petitioner.2. In view of the above, nothing survives in the present writ petition,Henc...
Eicher Motors Limited vs Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN AND WMP NO. 9201 OF 2024 Eicher Motors Limited Having office at 296, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600 119 Represented by its Constituted Attorney, Tapaswi Kumar Gupta. Petitioner(s) Vs1. Superintendent of Police CCD-1, Cyber Crime, Ranipet District-632 403. 2.State Rep. By Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police Station, Ranipet District-632 403. 3.The Branch Manager HDFC Bank Limited, No.115, 1st Floor, Dr Radha Krishnan Salai, Jagadambal Colony, Othavadi, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent not to freeze the petitioner's account No. 00040110000326 in the 3rd respondent bank which was directed to be frozen by the 2nd respondent on the basis of CSR-28 / 2024 and pass. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Keerthikir...
V.Balaji vs Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN and Crl.M.P.No.5505 of 2022 Dr.V.Balaji ... Petitioner Vs. The Inspector of Police, Veppery, Chennai. ... RespondentPRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, pleased to direct the respondent Police to conduct the further investigation in C.C.No.9149 of 2017 pending on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, CCB and CBCID cases at Egmore, Chennai by appreciating the facts submitted by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Dhamodaran For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondent to conduct the further investigation in C.C.No.9149 of 2017 pending on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, CCB & CBCID cases at Egmore, Chennai2. The main submission of the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner/de facto complaina...
C.Indernath, vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN AND WMP NOS. 9696 & 9699 OF 20241. C.Indernath, S/o.N.Chokalingam, Kosapet,Vellore District. 2.Philomena Indernath, W/o.C.Indernath, Kosapet, Vellore District. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, 3.R.Prabhu, S/o.Late Ramalingam, No. 49, Battai Street, Vellapadi, Vellore -632 001.Respondent(s) Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 1st and 2nd Respondents in any manner interfering with the civil dispute under the guise of enquiry summons issued on 12.03.2024, enquiring the complaint given by 3rd respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Mohameduduman For Respondent(s): Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate For R1 and R2ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the matter has been settled bet...
Indira Gopinath Vs M.D.Kanthamani and 4 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Mrs.Indira Gopinath Petitioner vs. 1.Ms.M.D.Kanthamani 2.Mr.M.D.Ramaswamy 3.Ms.S.Padma 4.Ms.Vanitha 5.K.G.Ramesh ...Respondents PRAYER: Original Petition filed under Sections 232 & 276 of the Indian Succession Act, Act XXXIX of 1925 and under Order XXV Rule 5 of O.S.Rules, prays that the letters of the administration with the will and codicil to the will annexed may be granted to her as the daughter and beneficiary under the will and codicil of the said deceased having effect through the State of Tamil Nadu. For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Ashif Mohammed For Respondents : No appearanceORDERThis Original Petition has been filed for issuance of the Letters of Administration in respect of the Will and Codicil 24.12.1987 and 25.12.1987 executed by late.M.R.Doraiswamy Iyengar, who died on 19.10.1994. The petitioner and the respondents 1 to 4 are the children of the testator and the fifth res...
N.Shanmugasundaram vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN N.Shanmugasundaram ... Petitioner -Vs-6. T.N. Duraimani ...RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to organise and conduct Chithirai Festival at Sri Kamatchiamman and Sri Kathavarayan Temple located in Thingalur Village, Thandagoundanpalayam, Perundurai Taluk, Erode District as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran For R1, R3 and R4 : Mr.P.Balathandayutham Special Government Pleader For R2 and R5 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to organise and conduct Chithirai Festival at Sri Kamatchiamman and Sri Kathavarayan Temple located in Thingalur Village, Thandagoundanpalayam, Perundurai Taluk, ...
The Hony.Secretary vs R.Kothandaraman
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And The Hony. Secretary Madras Aryan Club ... Petitioner Vs. 1.R.Kothandaraman 2.The Hon'ble Presiding Officer, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent in E.P.No.229 of 2013 in C.P.No.340 of 2012 dated 29.10.2013 and quash the same.For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : R1 Not Ready Notice R2 CourtORDEROn 25.02.2025, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence on 25.02.2025, theM.DHANDAPANI,J.pri writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' on 27.02.2025. 2.Today, even though the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No...
H.Shanthi, vs R.Jayalakshmi (Deceased),
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2025
C.M.P.No.13614 of 2021 in A.S.No.948 of 2020 and C.M.P.No.13319 of 2020S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR,J.(Order of the court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The miscellaneous petition, which has been filed to bring on Record the respondents 2 to 10 herein as legal representative of sole respondent and array them as respondents 2 to 10 in A.S.948 of 2020, stands ordered. [S.M.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 27.02.2025 veda Note: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the cause title. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »