Chennai Orders Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D.Thiyagarajan vs Vijay Babu Madhavan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-20-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 20.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in D.Thiyagarajan ... Petitioner Vs.1. Vijay Babu Madhavan2. Chellamal Ramaswamy3. Chellammal Ramaswamy4. State Rep by Inspector of Police, Coimbatore ... Respondents PRAYER : To permit the petitioner to intervene in Crl.OP.No.31143 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mr.M.NagarajORDERBeing satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered as prayed for. VvK.RAJASEKAR, J.Vv1. The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104. in...
Karunakaran Vs Mr.R.Soundarajan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-20-2025
A.No.1628 of 2025 in O.P DR.No.132258 of 2024 20.11.2025ORDER1. This application is filed by the applicant to issue citation to theth 6 respondent to bring on the original Will of Late.M.Kalimuthu (deceased) dated 31.05.1999 to produce before this court. It is the case of the applicant that his father Late.Kalimuthu died on 25.10.1999 at his residence and before his death he executed his last Will and testament and registered as Document No.79/1999, Book-3, Volume-102 at Page Nos.93 to 95 in Sub Registrar Office, Kodambakkam bequeathing his property allotted to him by Slum Clearance Board to the applicant after his death in the presence th of Mr.A.Gunasekaran and Mr.L.Charles Gabriel and the 6 respondent has been th appointed as Executor under the Will. Since, the 6 respondent has not come forward to th file the petition before this court he has been impleaded as the 6 respondent and the th original Will is believed to be in the custody of 6 respondent. th2. The 6 respondent has filed ...
Mahaveer Chand Jain vs Ram Rv
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-20-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 20.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR1.Mahaveer Chand Jain 2.Mahaveer Chand Jain HUF Represented by its Karta Mahaveer Chand Jain ... Petitioners Vs Ram Rv ... Respondent PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India praying to direct the learned 23rd Additional City Civil Court, Allikulam, Chennai, to dispose of O.S.No.9546 of 2019 within a time frame fixed by this Court and to proceed with the matter in accordance with law in an expedient and timely manner.For Petitioners : Ms.D.M.Hemalatha for Mr.G.Raj Kumar For Respondent : Mr.G.Mohammed AseefORDERThe above revision petition has been filed seeking a direction to the trial Court for early disposal of the suit.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would now submitthat the trial has alreaby been completed and hence, she seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the above revision. She has also made an endorsement to that eff...
C.N.Annadurai vs S.Padmavathi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-20-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 20.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR C.N.Annadurai ... Petitioner Vs S.Padmavathi ... Respondent PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the petition filed in D.V.C.No.233 of 2023 pending on the file of the Special Judicial Court to Try Cases filed under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, Coimbatore and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Guruprasad for Mr.T.Balaji For Respondent : Ms.R.ThenmozhiORDERThis civil revision petition is filed seeking to quash the complaint preferred by the respondent-wife under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act.2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent is not the wife of the petitioner and therefore, there is no domestic relationship between the parties to invoke the provisions of Domestic Violence Act.3. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.4. Existence of domestic relat...
A.Murugan vs the Commissioner of Municipal Administration
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-20-2025
C.M.P.Nos.4486, 5595 & 4521 of 2025 W.A.No.2929 of 2023R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.Since the respective respondents in the main writ appeal have died and for bringing the legal heirs of the respective respondents who are deceased, these petitions have been filed.Having been satisfied with the reasons, all these petitions are ordered. Registry is directed to carryout the necessary amendments. (R.S.K., J) (H.C., J) 20.11.2025 (drm) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Sumathi vs Rajamanickam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-20-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 20.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and CMP.No.3109 of 2024 Sumathi ... Petitioner Vs 1.Rajamanickam 2.Saminathan 3.Gopal @ Rajagopal ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.C.Munusamy For Respondents : Ms.S.Sasikala for R1 to R3ORDERThis civil revision petition is filed challenging the order dated 10.10.2023 passed by the trial Court dismissing the application in I.A.No.4 of 2022 in O.S.No.577 of 2017 filed by petitioner/plaintiff seeking to amend the plaint.2. The petitioner/plaintiff herein filed a suit for bare injunction inO.S.No.577 of 2017 as against the respondents/defendants, restraining them from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. 3, The respondents herein have filed a written statement, wherein they claim that they have purchased the suit property and other properties by means of a registered sale deed dated 14.09.1989 for a valuable consideration.4. The writt...
R.Aswin Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-20-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 20.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.No.7167 of 2019 R.Aswin ... Petitioner vs1. State of Tamil Nadu Law Department Rep by its Principal Secretary For St.George, Chennai-600009. 2.The Member Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board, EVK Sampath Maaligai, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai-600006. ..RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to permit the petitioner to participate in the interview for the post of Assistant Professors under Notification No.2/2018 dated 18.07.2018 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : No appearanceFor Respondents : Mrs.V.Yamuna Devi for R1 Special Government Pleader Mr.R.Siddharth, Standing Counsel-R2ORDERDespite the matter being listed on 17.10.2025, 31.10.2025 and 13.11.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner.2. Even today (20.1...
BAP Staff Union Vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-20-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 20-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA and WMP.Nos.13248 & 20913 of 20191. BAP Staff Union Reg. No.446/NAT, P.Pandiyan, BHEL/BAP/ Ranipet-632 406.2. BAP Employees Union, Reg. No.373/NAT, K.Sivakumar, BHEL/BAP/ Ranipet-632 406. Petitioner(s) Vs1. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, BHEL House, Siri Fort, New Delhi- 110 049. 2.The Director Human Resource 3.The General Manager (HR- Policy and IRX) 4.The Executive Director, Boiler Auxiliaries Plant, Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, Ranipet-632 406. 5.Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Employees Progressive Union, Reg. No. 239/TRI, Trichy-14. 6.Bharat Heavy Electricals Workers Union, Reg.No.90/TRI, Affl-CITU, Rep. By its General Secretary, Trichy-14. 7.BP Dr. Ambedkar Employees Union, Regn. No. 857 / TRI, BHEL, Trichy-14.8. BHEL Mazdoor Sangam, Regn. No. 494/TRI, Rep. by its General Secretary BHEL, Trichy -14. 9.Boiler Plant Anna Workers Uni...
BAP Staff Union Vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-20-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 20-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA WMP.Nos.13238, 13239, 13240 and 21408 of 20191. BAP Staff Union Reg. No.446/NAT, P.Pandiyan, BHEL/BAP/ Ranipet-632 406.2. BAP Employees Union, Reg. No.373/NAT, K.Sivakumar, BHEL/BAP/ Ranipet-632 406. Petitioner(s) Vs1. Bharat Heavy Electricals LimitedRep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, BHEL House, Siri Fort, New Delhi- 110 049. 2.The Director Human Resource 3.The General Manager (HR- Policy and IRX) 4.The Executive Director, Boiler Auxiliaries Plant, Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, 5.Bharat Heavy Electricals Workers Union Reg. NO. 90/TRI, Affl - CITU, Trichy-14.6.Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Employees Progressive Union WORKERS UNION, Reg. No. 239/TRI, Trichy-14. 7.BHEL Desia Thozhilaalar Sangam Reg. NO. 1332/TRI, Rep. by Mr.Balamurugan, Near Ganesa Point, Thiruverumbur, Trichy-14 8.Boiler Plant Anna Workers Union Rep. No. 156/TRI, Affl-ATP, Trichy-149. BHEL Mazdoor Sangam, Regn...
National Horticulture Board vs 1.M/S.Indus Flora Base Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-11-2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA National Horticulture Board, Ministry Of Agriculture, 735, Anna Salai, LLA Building III Floor, Chennai 600 002. ..Plaintiff(s) Vs1. M/s.Indus Flora Base Ltd, 4-E, Vandana Towers, Having Regd. Office at No.10, Haddows Road, Chennai 600 006.2. Mandeep Grewal, H.A.L. IIIrd Stage,3. Sri G.S.Grewal,4. Randeep Grewal, No.655, Gurudeva Nagar, Rackhonar Road, Ludhiana 141 001.5. Mrs.Ranjeet Grewal W/o.G.S.Grewal,6. M/s.Canara Bank Agri -Hitech Branch, Spencer Buildings, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. ..Defendant(s) PRAYER : Plaint filed under Order VII Rule I and Order 34 Rule 1 of C.P.C., r/w.Order 37 of Original Side Rules, to pass the following decree,(a) Directing the defendants 1 to 5 to pay the plaintiff a sum ofRs.65,81,107.00 being the aggregate amount due with future service charges at 4% per annum from the date of plaint till date of realization and penal interest at 18% from the d...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »