Chennai Orders Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vimaladass vs Sivakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Vimaladoss ... Petitioner Vs Sivakuamr ... RespondentPrayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to call for the records from the lower Court; to issue summon to the respondent; to issue summons to the lower Court to produce the relevant records on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court at Gingee in C.C.No. 107/2014; to pass an order to the lower Court for retrial; to hear the argument from both sides and the order of the Trial Court have to be set aside and this appeal may be allowed and convict the respondent with fine as accordance with law. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.K.MahalingamORDERThis matter is listed under the caption for 'dismissal' as there was no representation for the appellant on last occasion (i.e. on 06.11.2025). Today also (i.e. on 18.11.2025), there is no representat...
M.Devaraj vs the Director General(Highways)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-18-2025
WMP.No.9691 of 2025 in WP.No.8663 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.This writ miscellaneous petition has been filed to dispense with the original impugned orders of the sixth respondent dated 05.11.2024 and of the seventh respondent dated 13.02.2025.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this writ miscellaneous petition is allowed. 18.11.2025 lok (1/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Commissioner of Customs vs Iti Ltd.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-18-2025
C.M.P. No.28247 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR. No.33003 of 2018 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J., and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J., (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) Seeking to condone the delay of 1130 days in representing the appeal, the present petition has been filed.2. Heard Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the petitioner.3. On being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, delay of 1130 days in representing the appeal is condoned and this petition is allowed. (S.M.S.J.) (M.S.Q.J.) 18.11.2025 mmi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Chelladurai vs the Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 18.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN WP.No.7031 of 2025 and WMP.No.7765 of 2025 T.Chelladurai .... Petitioner Vs BLOCK NO.5, SHASTRI BHAVAN, CHENNAI-6.... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT PERTAINING THE IMPUGNED G.O. (MS) NO. 09 DT 08.01.25 AND ITS CONSEQUENTLY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ISSUED THE IMPUGNED REVERSIONORDER THROUGH PROCEEDINGS SE.MU.AA.NO.Pa.A.PaAND QUASH THE SAME AND TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO GET BACK AS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran For Respondents : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, Special Government PleaderORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT PERTAINING THE IMPUGNED G.O. (MS) NO. 09 DT 08.01.25 AND ...
Ramanujam Ammal (Deceased) 1. Palani Vs Govindaraju
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN in S.A.No.1331 of 2004 Ramanujam Ammal (Deceased) 1. Palani Taluk, Ariyalur District. and 2 Others Appellant(s) Vs Govindaraju Taluk, Ariyalur District. and 3 Others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Ms.Abinu Monisha for Mr.A.V.Arun For Respondent(s):ORDERAs per the order of this Court dated 20.03.2025, publication has been effected. Notice on the 4th respondent is deemed to have been served. 2.Accordingly, this petition is ordered. 3.Post S.A.No.1331 of 2004 in the usual course. 18-11-2025 krkV.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.krk To1. Govindaraju2. Indira3. Kulanthaivelu (Deceased)4. Kamaladevi in S.A.No.1331 of 2004 18.11.2025...
Anbalagan, vs Subramanian,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Anbalagan ... Appellant vs. 1.Subramanian 2.Kulanthaivel ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and Judgment dated 30.08.2013 in A.S.No.14 of 2012 on the file of the Additional District Court, Ariyalur, reversing the decree andJudgment dated 29.08.2005 in O.S.No.85 of 1997 on the file of the PrincipalDistrict Munsif Court, Ariyalur. For Appellant : No appearance Page No.1 of 4 For Respondents : No appearanceORDERWhen the second appeal came up for hearing on 07.11.2025, there was no representation for the appellant and hence the Registry was directed to post this matter under the caption "for dismissal' on 18.11.2025. Even today, i.e., 18.11.2025, there is no representation for the appellant. A perusal of the records shows that there was no representation on behalf of the appellant on several occasions.2. In vie...
L.Chinnaiya Vs The Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 18.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR L.Chinnaiya ... Petitioner vs1. The Commissioner, Sugar Mills, Periyar E.V.R. Complex, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.2. The Superintendent,Perambalur Sugar Mills Ltd., Eraiyur P.O. Permabalur District, Tamil Nadu - 621 133. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Cetriorari, to call for the records leading to the impugned proceedings of the second respondent dated 02.02.2018 in Na.Ka.No.184/2015/E1 and quash the same and consequentially direct the respondents to take note of the petitioner's date of birth as per the birth certificate produced by the petitioner and re-initiate thepetitioner as Mazdoor in the second respondent Mill and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.Anirud Narayen for Ms.R.Ramya For Respondents : Mr.E.P.Senniyangiri Government Advocate for R1 Mr.R.Parthiban for R2ORDERHeard the learned ...
Mr.Kannan vs Venkatesh Sowrirajan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI IN Mr.Kannan ... impleading Petitioner/Proposed Respondent ..Vs..1. Shri. Venkatesh Sowrirajan ...1st Respondent/petitioner2. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. By its Secretary3. The Commissioner4. The Joint Commissioner5. The Executive Officer6. The Fit Person Prayer: This Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to impead the petitioner as party respondent in the above Writ Petition. For Petitioner :: Mr. T.S.Vijaya Raghavan For 1st Respondent:: Mr. P.Swaminathan For RR 2 to 6 :: Mr. K.KarthikeyanORDERMr.Kannan/petitioner has sought to implead himself as respondent in this Writ Petition.2. According to the petitioner, he is one of the Sthalathars of the subject temple and has been regularly participating in various Kainkariyam in the temple. The affidavit filed in support of this petition reveals that the implead petitioner is a necessary party to the writ peti...
V.Sampath vs the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-18-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.11888 of 2025 and WMP.no.13459 of 2025 V.Sampath ... Petitioner Vs.1.THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND WATER SUPPLY DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI 600 009 2.THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, NO 75, SANTHOME HIGH ROAD, CHENNAI 600 028 3.THE DIRECTOR, ENTRANCE EXAMINATION CNETER, ANNA UNIVERSITY, SARDAR PATEL ROAD, CHENNAI 600 025 ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned rejection order of non-selection of the petitioner vide memorandum No. 14859 / 2022 / M1 dated 27.02.2024 uploaded on 20.03.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same,consequently direct the respondents to select and appoint the petitioner ...
R.S.M.Manoranjitham vs the Principal Secretary to the Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-18-2025
WMP.Nos.13660 & 14118 of 2025 in WP.Nos.12097 & 12522 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these miscellaneous petitions both the writ miscellaneous petitions to permit the petitioners to join together to file a single writ petition, is allowed on payment of single court fee. 18.11.2025 (1/3) lok https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »