Chennai Orders Court November 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.Thangaraj vs the Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19.11.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN P.Thangaraj .. Petitioner -vs-1. The Commissioner,2. The Director,3. The District Collector,4. The Director, Town and Country Planning, Chennai 600 002.5. The Chief Educational Officer,6. The District Educational Officer,7. The Block Development Officer, Omalur, Omalur Taluk, Salem District.8. The Block Development Officer (Kee.Voo) Omalur, Omalur Taluk, Salem District.9. The Correspondent, Sri.Thulasi Vigash Metric School, Thulasampatti, Omalur Taluk, Salem District. .. RespondentsPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 8 to conduct an enquiry regarding the malpractice committed by the 9th respondent while obtaining school building approval and reorganization and pass orders directing the 9th respondent not to use the una...
M.Ezhilarasan vs J.Ramani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-19-2025
DATED: 19-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 605 of 2025 CMP No.3485 of 2025 1 . M.Ezhilarasan 2 . Malar kodi 3 . V.Mani .. Petitioner(s) Vs. 1 . J.Ramani Respondent(s) PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to call for the records pertaining to DVC No.163 of 2024 pending on the file of Additional Mahila Court, Egmore, Chennai and strike out the petitioners name on the grounds of abuse of process of law and allow the civil revision petition. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Chandrasekar 1 of 6 For Respondent(s) Ms.N.Rathi Rekha This Civil Revision Petition is filed to strike off the petitioners name in the complaint preferred by the respondent under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act. nd2. The first petitioner is husband, 2 petitioner is mother in-law and thethird petitioner is sister in-law of the respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits the averments made in the complaint are very vague and only to w...
Arun Kumar vs Suganthi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-19-2025
DATED: 19-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No.759 of 2025 and CMP No.4329 and 4330 of 20251. Arun Kumar 2 . Sargunam3. Jaishankar Petitioner(s)Vs. Suganthi Respondent(s) PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to call for the records inpursuant to the DVC No.20 of 2024 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Vellore, Vellore District and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Sathishkumar For Respondent(s) : Mr.Y.KajanivasORDER1 of 7 This civil revision petition is filed challenging the complaint preferred by the respondent/wife under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act.2. The first petitioner is husband of the respondent. The 2nd petitioner ismother in-law and 3rd petitioner is brother in-law of the respondent. The petitioners filed this civil revision petition seeking to strike of their name, mainly on the ground that the allegations made in the complaint are false and the same are not s...
CHRISTOPHER RAJ Vs Sukanya Jasmine
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-19-2025
DATED: 19-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No.712 of 2025 and CMP No.4068 of 20251. Christopher Raj2 . Dorothy Petitioner(s) Vs. 1 . Sukanya Jasmine 2 . Minor C.Judith rep. By mother and guardian Mrs.P.Sukanya Jasmine 3 . Charles Abraham Respondent(s) PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the order of Judicial Magistrate, Special Court for Trial of Domestic Violence Cases, Coimbatore dated 21.09.2024 in CMP No.22678 of 2024 in DVC No.164 of 2024.For Petitioner(s): Mr..J.Antony Jesus For Respondent(s) : Mr.N.Ponraj for R1 and R2. Mr.A.K.Dayalakannan for R3 1 of 6 for Mr.S.Kalimuthu MylavanORDERThis civil revision petition is filed challenging the order passed by the learned Magistrate dismissing the application filed by the petitioners/ parents in-law of the first respondent, seeking strike off their name in the complaint preferred by the first respondent under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act.2. A...
S.Srimathy vs Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19.11.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI and W.M.P. Nos.5534, 5535, 5537, 5538, 5539 and 5540 of 2024 S.Srimathy Petitioner in W.P. No.5034 of 2024 A.Monisha Petitioner in W.P. No.5037 of 2024 vs.1. Union of India Ministry of Youth and Sports Affairs (MYAS), Room No.560, A Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110 001. 2.Sports Authority of India (SAI) Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium Complex (East Gate), Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110 003. 3.Taekwondo Federation of India (TFI) Taekwondo Training Hall, Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Stadium, Basaveshwara Nagar, Bengaluru-560 079. 4.Pondicherry Taekwondo Sports Association No.66, Shop No.8, 1st Floor, CPI Complex, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry-605 004. 5.Tamil Nadu Taekwondo Association, No.9, Dr.Ranga Road, Mylapore, Chennai.(R5-Suo Motu impleaded as per orderdated 27.02.2024 in W.P. No.5034 of Respondents 2024 in both W.P.sPrayer in W.P. No.5034 of 2024: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constit...
Jayantra Vs Ranjitha.S
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-19-2025
C.M.P.No.25288 of 2025 C.M.P.No.25288 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.78824 of 2024R. KALAIMATHI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 235 days in representing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.3. Despite the receipt of notice, neither the respondents appeared nor entered appearance through their counsel.4. The 1st petitioner would aver that on complying with the returns, somedelay occurred and thereafter, the bundle was misplaced and it was traced and represented, thereby delay of 235 days occurred in representing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.5. Accepting the averments made by the petitioners, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 19.11.2025 Mac https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Additional Chief Secretary to Government Vs V.Jawahar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-19-2025
inIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR in1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Services Wing, Ser 2(2) Section, Secretariat, Chennai 9.2. The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue Administration and Disaster Management, Ezhilagam, Chennai 5.3. The District Collector, Namakkal. ... Petitioners Vs in1. V.Jawahar2. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, 4th Floor, Egmore, Chennai 8. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 788 days in filing the above writ appeal. For Petitioners : Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh Special Government Pleader For Respondents : Mr.K.N.Pandiyan for R1 Mr.K.Sathish Kumar Standing Counsel for R2ORDER(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) in Though some...
D.Selma Missier vs Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED 19.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR . JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN D.Selma Missier ... PetitionerVersusUnion of India Rep.by The Chief Post Master General Tamilnadu Circle Chennai-2 ...Respondent Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to Order in O.A/310/01014/2023 dated 10.10.2024 on the file of the respondent and quash the same as the certificate issued by the RevenueAuthority the land under poromboke (Goverment land), as the total points comes to 49 from 42 and the petitioner is eligible for the post of MTS recommended candidates by the Circle Relaxation Committee (CRC) for the year 2017-18 and to extend all service benefits like similarly situated employees working under Department of post. For Petitioner : Dr.K.Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.A.Kumaraguru Senior Panel CounselORDER(Ord...
The State of Tamil Nadu Vs L. Solomon
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-19-2025
C.M.P.No.7106 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.42217 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 136 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners.3. Despite notice having been served and the name and the address of the respondent has been printed in the cause list, no one is appearing for the respondent.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (H.C., J.) 19.11.2025 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.Jaya Vs Jithan Shah
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Nov-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :19/11/2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL AND C.M.P.NO.7980 OF 2022 Mrs.M.Jaya, No.28/11, Raja Street, Gandhi Road, Velachery, Chennai 600 042. ... Petitioner/Petitioner/ Plaintiff Vs. 1.Jithan Shah, 2.Mrs.Bharati J.Shah, 3.Bajaj Finserv, Represented by its Authorized Signatory, No.804, 805, 806, 8th Floor, Delta Wing, Rahaja Towers, 177, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. ... Respondents /Respondents/ Defendants Page No.1 of 4PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to set-aside docket sheet Order dated April 13, 2022 passed in unnumbered I.A.SR.No.14099 of 2022 in O.S.No.3539 of 2015 on the file of the Learned XVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, at Chennai and consequently direct the Learned XVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, at Chennai to number the above Interlocutory Application.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathish for Mr.T.Sundaravadanam For Respondent-1 : Not r...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »