Chennai Orders Court October 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arun Peter Nirmal Raj Vs The Cheif Educational Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.10.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR Arun Peter Nirmal Raj ... Petitioner Vs. 4.Shanthi Suguna Rani B.T.Assistant (History) Cuddlore District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1 st respondent in Na.Ka.No.11959/E2/2018 dated 26.02.2019 and to quash the same in Page No.1 of 4 so far as petitioner alone is concern and consequently issue direction to respondents to allow the petitioner to serves as B.T.Assistant in the 3rd respondent School. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan for Ms.T.Dharani For Respondents : Ms.A.Bakkiyalakhmi for R1 and R2 Government Advocate No appearance for R3 and R4 *****ORDERMr.S.Nedunchezhiyan learned representing counsel for Ms.T.Dharani, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in the writ petiti...
M/s.Bhoruka Classic Finance Pvt LTd Vs M/s.Shriram Finance Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
A.No.5285 of 2025 IN Arb.O.P.(Com.Div.) D.No.27874 of 2025N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 24 days in filing the Arb.O.P.(Com.Div.) D.No.27874 of 2025.2. Heard both sides.3. Satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed.4. Registry is directed to number theoriginal petition, if it is otherwise in orderand post it along with Arb.O.P.(Com.Div.) No.579 of 2024.5. Registry is also directed to print the name of Mr.J.Ravi Kumar, as learned counsel for the petitioner in the cause list. 30.10.2025 gya https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Lavanaya Devakumari Vs The Chief Educational Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.10.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR, J.S.Lavanya Devakumari ... Petitioner Vs.Cuddalore District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1 st respondent in Na.Ka.No.11959/E2/2018 dated 26.02.2019 and to quash the same in so far as petitioner alone is concern and consequently issue direction to respondents to allow the petitioner to serves as B.T.Assistant (Science) in the 3rd respondent School.Page No.1 of 4 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan for Ms.T.Dharani For Respondents : Ms.A.Bakkiyalakhmi for R1 and R2 Government Advocate No appearance for R3 *****ORDERMr.S.Nedunchezhiyan learned representing counsel for Ms.T.Dharani, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and ...
M.Durai vs E. Dhanasekar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.10.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR M.Durai ... Petitioner Vs.1. E.Dhansekar2. E.Deivanai3. The Sub-RegistrarRegister Officer Kaveripakkam, Nemili Taluk Ranipet District Pin Code-631 051 ...Respondent PRAYER :Civil Revision Petition filed Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying, to set aside the order dated 17.12.2024 passed in IA No. 8/2023 in OS No. 131/2020 by the Sub-Ordinate Judge at Arakkonam. For Petitioner : Mr.Pari Gopal For Respondent : M/s.Aswini Devi.K for R3 Additional Government pleaderORDERThe Civil Revision Petition is filed by the plaintiff in a suit for specific performance challenging the order passed by the court below allowing theapplication filed by a third party for his impleadment. 2.The first respondent/ third party to the suit, purchased the suit property pending suit for specific performance. He has filed a petition in IA.No.08 of 2023 seeking his impleadment in the suit. The trial court ...
Chithra vs M. Govindaraj
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
in This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 247 days in filing the above CMA.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. He submit that due tountimely demise of 1st petitioner in the accident, she was subjected to severe financial constraints and has been struggling to run her family containing three girl children and she can be able to file the appeal only after attaining financial stability. In the meantime, there occurred a delay of 247 days in filing the appeal. Hence, he prayed for condoning the delay in filing the appeal.3. Inspite of service of notice on the 1st respondent and his name being printed in the cause list, there is no representation for him either in person or through counsel.4. Learned counsel for the 2nd respondent is having objection for allowing this petition stating that the delay in filing the appeal is huge.5. Accepting the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this msr petition, this petition is allowed subje...
Tharanya Vs Venkatesan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR IN CRL OP NO. 30012 OF 2024 Tharanya Petitioner(s) Vs 4.The Inspector of Police Respondent(s) K.V.Kuppam Police Station, Vellore District. Crime No.273 of 2024 For Petitioner(s): T.Saravanan A.Sivapandi P.Lavanya Addl Typed Set Filed ------- Additional Typed Set Of Papers Filed For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udaya Kumar, for R4 Government Advocate (Crl. Side) S.Raja Ravi Varma D.Ajith Kumar B.Karthik K.Sathish Kumar R.Lokeshwaran A.Prabhakaran Public Prosecutor For R4ORDEROrdered. gbi Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To S/o.Govindasamy, No.2/109, Naicker Street, Vepanganeri Village, S/o.Ponnambalam, No.88, Vazhakundram, Kothamangalam, S/o.Munusamy, No.38, 1st Main Road, Muthuamizh Nagar, Tharapadavedu, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore District. 4.The Inspector of Police K.V.Kuppam Police Station, Vellore District. Crime No.273/2024 5.The Public Prosecutor High ...
C. Sharan Sree Harsh vs the State Rep.by, the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR C. Sharan Sree Harsh Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep.By, The Inspector Of Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): M. Velan For Intervenor Mr.Arun Anbumani For Respondent(s): Mr S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. gbi Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The State Rep.By, The Inspector Of 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi CRL OP No. 9696 of...
Murugammal vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
CMP.No.17906 of 2025 in CMA.SR.No.53016 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 2296 days in filing the above CMA.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Nithin, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalat for the sole respondent.3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would aver that theaccident is a fatal accident and on account of the untimely death of her husband-Gnanasekaran, the 1st petitioner/wife of the deceased Ganansekaran has no money to run her family and she has been struggling to maintain even her family consisting of her minor son and age old mother -in- law. Due to her financial constraint, there occurred a delay of 2296 days in filing the appeal. The delay in filing the appeal is neither wilful, nor wanton, but due to the above said reason. Thus he prayed for condoning the delay of 2296 days in filing the appeal.4. Learned counsel for the sole respondent has got objections in allowing the petition a...
S.T.Nedunchezhiyan vs the Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.10.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.T.Nedunchezhiyan ... Petitioner Vs. Kancheepuram District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders to delete the entry from the Encumbrance Register in respect of the Mortgage Deeds dated 19.04.1978 & 13.12.1988 registered as Doc.Nos.607/1978 & 1593/1988, on the file of the third respondent based on the representation dated 20.02.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathia Chandran For Respondents : Mr.Abishek Murthy, Government AdvocateORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.2. Considering the submission coupled with an endorsement madeby the learned counsel for the p...
K.Marimuthu Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by its Director General of ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.10.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No. 11184 of 2025 K.Marimuthu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu Police Department, Rajaji Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai City, O/o, The Commissioner of Police, EVK. Sampath Salai, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.3.The Inspector of Police (Crime), P-3, Vyasarpadi Police Station, Vyasarpadi, Chennai 600 039. 4.Ambedkar ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to transfer the investigation of the case in Cr.No.426 of 2024 pending on the file of Inspector of Police, to CCB or CBCID or any other Independent Agency as directed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. K.Premkumar For Respondents: Mr. K.M.D.Muhilan 1 to 3 Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThis crimina...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »