Chennai Orders Court October 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C.Dhandapani Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER and WMP.Nos.30370 & 30371 of 2016 and 18430 of 2017 C.Dhandapani Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Secretary to GovernmentEducation, Chennai 25. Rep by its chairman, Gudiyatham 632 602, Vellore District. 5.G.Elangovan Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the 2nd respondents proceedings No. 10372/C4/2015 dt 12.07.2015 and quash the same and direct the respondents 2 and 3 to appoint and approve the petitioner as Head of Department in Mechanical Engineering Department in the 4th respondent Polytechnic pursuant to the selection for the year 2015.For Petitioner(s): NA For Respondent(s): M/s.R.L.Karthika GA for R1 and 2.ORDERAs per the docket sheet, on 24.04.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to verity whether any cause survives in this Writ Petiti...
D.Kumaravel, Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER and WMP.Nos.30944 & 30945 of 20161. D.Kumaravel2. S.Selvendran Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Respondent(s)PRAYER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in Government Letter No.53137/ Pay Cell/ 2015-1 dated 25.09.2015 and quash the same in so far as it is made applicable to the Petitioners and consequently direct the respondents to continue them in the Pay Band of Rs.15600-39100+ GP 5400 and grant them all consequential benefits. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Rajendran For Respondent(s): M/s.R.L.Karthika GAORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous and nothing survives further to adjudicate in this Writ Petition.2. Recording the submission mad...
Vichithiravanitha Vs The Director of Treasuries
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER and WMP.No.31582 of 2016 Vichithiravanitha Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Director of TreasuriesSaidapet, Chennai 15. Mannargudi, Thiruvarur District. Respondent(s) PRAYER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on file of the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in No. Na. Ka. Mu. Aa. 50/16 2016/A2 dt 01.06.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to repay the already recovered amount from the family pension without notice to the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Balasubramanian For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Nanmaaran AGP for R1 and R2.ORDERWhen the matter came up for hearing on 25.07.2025, this Court directed the petitioner to file the translated copy of the documents in Tamil and the case was adjourned. Subsequently, when the matter came up for hearing on 15.10.2025, the petition...
Venkat @ Venkatesan vs S.Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and C.M.P.Nos.1501,1505 and 1507 of 2024 Venkat @ Venkatesan ... Petitioner Vs.1. S.Kumar Kuppammal (died)2. Kamaraj3. Murali4. Babu5. Prabu6. Selvam7. S.K.Janakiraman8. S.K.J.Ajay9. S.K.J.Harish10. S.K.J.Kavya11. M.Mahadev Sharma12. The Joint Sub Registrar-I, O/o.District Registrar, Vellore, Arani Road, Velapadi, Vellore City.13. The Commissioner, Vellore City Municipal Corporation, Infantry Road, Vellore City.14. The Tahsildhar, Vellore Taluk, Taluk Office, Arani Road, Velapadi, Vellore City.15. The Village Administrative Officer, Vellore North, Having Office at Sheraf Line Road, Long Bazaar, Vellore. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying, to set aside the order and decree dated 07.12.2023 made in I.A.No.2 of 2023 in O.S.No.35 of 2008 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Vellore, Vellore District, by allowing the...
S. Ramachandran vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.10.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and C.M.P.No.26702 of 2023 1.S.Ramachandran 2.S.Arumugam ...Appellants Vs. Kanchipuram District. ...Respondents PRAYER: The Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying to allow the above Writ Appeal by setting aside the order dated 24.08.2022 passed in W.P.No.25863 of 2014. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mrs.Akila Rajendran, Govt. Advocate *****JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) When the matter was called on 28.10.2025, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal today. Even today none appears for the appellants.2. Hence, this Writ Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S., J.) (M.S.Q., J.) dsa Index :Yes/No ...
Rajivgandhi vs Vanniyakodi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 457 of 2024 and CMP No.2181 of 20241. RAJIVGANDHI, S/o. Elyaperumal,2. Elayaperumal, S/O. Duraisamy,3. CHINNAPAPPA W/O. Elayaperumal, petitioners 1 to 3 Res. at Keelmathur Village, Andiyur Post, Uthangarai Petitioner(s) Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Vs1. VANNIYAKODI W/o. Rajivgandhi, D/o. Annadurai, Chinnapalaythottam Village, Palathotam Post, Pachampalli Taluk, Respondent(s) Krishnagiri Dt.PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India To strike off the Domestic Violence Complaint filed in DVC No.5 of 2020 pending on the file of Learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli, Krishnagiri District, by allowing the present civil revision petition. 1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr. R.Sathish Kumar For Respondent(s): No appearanceORDERThis Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking to strike of the complaint preferred by the respondents unde...
Suresh vs Ramya Devi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 537 of 2024 and CMP No.2628 of 20241. SURESH S/o.Annamalai, 13/42, Chetty Street, Kumananchavadi, Kundrathur Road, Petitioner(s) Poonamallee, Chennai Vs1. Ramya DeviW/o.Suresh, D/o.Natarajan, Cheyyar, Tiruvannamalai District 2.ANNAMALAI S/o.Vethachelam, 13/42, Chetty Street, 3.MALA W/o.Annamalai, 13/42, Chetty Street, 4.MANIKANDAN S/o.Annamalai, 13/42, Chetty Street, 1 of 5 5.SANGEETHA W/o.Palani, No.72, Sengunthar Street, VTC Palaseevaram, Palaseevaram, Kancheepuram District (Respondents 2 to 5 are no necessary parties to file a Civil Revision petition Respondent(s) hence notice may be dispense with) PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to call for the records pertaining to the petition in DVC No.10 of 2022 pending on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar and strike out the petitioners name and the same as abuse process...
Elumalai (Died) vs Kanna Gounder (Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
C.M.P.Nos.8711, 8714 & 8716 of 2025 in S.A. No. 1091 of 2014 DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, JThese petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 57 days in filing a petition to set aside the abatement, to set aside the abatement caused by the death of the sole appellant and to bring on record the proposed appellants as legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant respectively. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant who undertakes to file vakalat for the proposed parties and the learned counsel for the respondent who submits that he has got no serious objection in allowing these petitions. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the cause title and print the name of Ms.P.Veena Suresh, as counsel for the newly impleaded parties on receipt of vakalat.30.10.2025 jv 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
ELUMALAI (DIED) Vs Vellachiammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
C.M.P.Nos.8699, 8701 & 8710 of 2025 in S.A. No. 1090 of 2014 DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, JThese petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 57 days in filing a petition to set aside the abatement, to set aside the abatement caused by the death of the sole appellant and to bring on record the proposed appellants as legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant respectively. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant who undertakes to file vakalat for the proposed parties and the learned counsel for the respondent who submits that he has got no serious objection in allowing these petitions. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the cause title and print the name of Ms.P.Veena Suresh, as counsel for the newly impleaded parties on receipt of vakalat.30.10.2025 jv 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
A.Sasikala, Vs Dr.P.Viswanathamurthi,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER CONT P.No.518 of 2025 T.Jayalakshmi Petitioner(s) Vs CONT P No. 517 of 2025 A.Sasikala Petitioner(s) Vs COMMON PRAYER: These Contempt Petitions are filed to punish the respondent for the willful disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.Nos. 4101 & 4140 of 2016 dated 23.03.2023. In both Contempt Petitions': For Petitioner(s): M/s. S.Doraiswamy For Contemnor(s): Mr.P.Godson Swaminath, for M/s.Isaac ChambersORDERThis Court, by order dated 23.03.2023 in W.P.Nos.4101 & 4140 of 2016, remitted the matter to the respondent for reconsideration of the matter afresh after affording an opportunity to the petitioners.2. Today, the learned counsel for the respondent is present and has informed that re-enquiry proceedings were conducted and orders have been passed after serving notice on the petitioners.3. The learned counsel for the petitioners is present. It i...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »