Chennai Orders Court October 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anita Mary.D Vs The Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Anita Mary D Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600 008. ...Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to regularize the petitioner's appointment as Nurse in the regular pay scale of Rs.9,300 34,800/- plus Grade Pay Rs.4,550/- or any other present regular pay scale at par with the other government nurses with effect from the respective date of appointment.For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.E.Sundaram R1 and R2 Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.L.Murugavelu Standing CounselORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing on 26.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.2. Today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hen...
Rubini.G. Vs The Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Rubini G Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600 008. ...Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to regularize the petitioner's appointment as Nurse in the regular pay scale of Rs.9,300 34,800/- plus Grade Pay Rs.4,550/- or any other present regular pay scale at par with the other government nurses with effect from the respective date of appointment.For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.E.Sundaram R1 and R2 Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.L.Murugavelu Standing CounselORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing on 26.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.2. Today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, ...
Karthika.D Vs The Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Karthika D Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600 008. ...Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to regularize the petitioner's appointment as Nurse in the regular pay scale of Rs.9,300 34,800/- plus Grade Pay Rs.4,550/- or any other present regular pay scale at par with the other government nurses with effect from the respective date of appointment.For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.E.Sundaram R1 and R2 Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.L.Murugavelu Standing CounselORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing on 26.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.2. Today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence...
Akila.N Vs The Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Akila N Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600 008. ...Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to regularize the petitioner's appointment as Nurse in the regular pay scale of Rs.9300 34800/- plus Grade Pay Rs.4,550/- or any other present regular pay scale at par with the other government nurses with effect from the respective date of appointment.For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.E.Sundaram R1 and R2 Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.L.Murugavelu Standing CounselORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing on 26.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.2. Today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the...
Bhuvaneswari Kanagasabapathy.K Vs The Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Bhuvaneswari Kanagasabapathy K Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600 008. ...Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to regularize the petitioner's appointment as Nurse in the regular pay scale of Rs.9300 34800/- plus Grade Pay Rs.4,550/- or any other present regular pay scale at par with the other government nurses with effect from the respective date of appointment.For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.E.Sundaram R1 and R2 Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.L.Murugavelu Standing CounselORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing on 26.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.2. Today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the...
Malarkodi.M Vs The Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Malarkodi M Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600 008. ...Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to regularize the petitioner's appointment as Nurse in the regular pay scale of Rs.9,300 34,800/- plus Grade Pay Rs.4,550/- or any other present regular pay scale at par with the other government nurses with effect from the respective date of appointment.For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.E.Sundaram R1 and R2 Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.L.Murugavelu Standing CounselORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing on 26.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.2. Today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Henc...
Meena.S, Vs The Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Meena S Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600 008. ...Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to regularize the petitioner's appointment as Nurse in the regular pay scale of Rs.9,300 34,800/- plus Grade Pay Rs.4,550/- or any other present regular pay scale at par with the other government nurses with effect from the respective date of appointment.For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.E.Sundaram R1 and R2 Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.L.Murugavelu Standing CounselORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing on 26.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, therefore, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.2. Today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, t...
P.Suguna Vs G.Vishwanatha Achari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-24-2025
C.M.P.No.14594 of 2025 in S.A.SR.No.62011 of 2025K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner/appellant seeking to condone the delay of 95 days in filing the above S.A.SR.No.62011 of 2025.2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that he has no serious objection to this petition being allowed.3. Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. 24.10.2025 mrr Note: Registry is directed to number S.A.SR.No.62011 of 2025, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for hearing on 27.10.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.Gunasekaran, vs S.N.L.Jayabalan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-23-2025
C.R.P. NPD Nos.1390 and 1391 of 2006V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.While going through the papers, it has come to my notice that the Second Appellate Court had stayed all further proceedings before the Rent Control Appellate Authority. The present revision arises against the order passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority, after theorder of stay had been granted by the SecondAppellate Court in S.A.No.1001 of 2000 dated 23.04.2006. To be clear that the stay was granted on 23.04.2006 and the impugned order in this revision was passed on 11.07.2006, hence the aforesaid second appeal and the present revision petitions have to be heard together.2. In the above circumstances, theRegistry is required to place the papers before My Lord Hon'ble The Chief Justice for passing suitable orders to post the second appeal in S.A.No.1001 of 2000 along with this revision petition for disposal of the same. 02.06.2025 (1/2) stn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Dr.N.Gunashekaran vs Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Oct-23-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP No. 17082 of 2012 N.Gunashekaran Petitioner(s) Vs Represented by Principal Secretary to Government, College Road, Chennai-600 006.3. G.P.Raman4. Ravishankar5. A.R.Rajamani6. M.Ravichandran7. N.Varadarajan ... Respondents PRAYER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of Indiaseeking Writ of Certiorari Mandamus to call for the records relating to the orderRC.No.15872/J2/2012 dated 31.05.2012 passed by the 2nd respondent quash the same in so far as the seniority assigned to erstwhile Readers, particularly the Petitioner is concerned and direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to recast the seniority of the petitioner herein by placing the petitioner senior to all the erstwhile Lecturers (Selection Grade) in the merged post of Associate Professor by reckoning his inter se seniority among erstwhile Readers on the basis of his date of promotion to the post of Reader and ...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »