Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Divisional Manager, vs Minor Sham @ Sham Kumar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
CMP. No.1849 of 2025 in CMA.SR.No.5956 of 2025M.DHANDAPANI,J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 109 days in representing the above civil miscellaneous appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Court is inclined to order this petition.4. Accordingly this Petition is allowed. 30.01.2025 rli Note: Registry is directed to number the miscellaneous petition and post the main appeal in the usual course. 30.01.2025 rli https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Kumaresan vs the State Rep. by, the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA KUMARESAN S/o.Natarajan, No.35, Mariyamman Kovil Street, Marakkanam, Villupuram District - 604 303. and 2 Others Appellant(s) Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector Of Police, Marakkanam Police Station, Villupuram District. Crime No.858 Of 2024. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): G.Tamilselvan D.Stalinantonyraj M.Jayaprakash For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to extend the time to comply with the condition imposed on the petitioner as per the order dated 12.12.2024 in Crl.O.P.No.30922 of 2024. 2.Heard both sides. 3.Time granted by this Court to comply with the conditions imposed by this Court videorder dated 12.12.2024 in Crl.O.P.No.30922 of 2024 is hereby extended for a period oftwo weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and no further extension of time will be grante...
Administration Vs The Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN in WA.SR.No.110660 of 2024 Administration Rep.by its President K. Palanisamy (now Administrator B. Gowthaman) Vengamedu Weavers Cooperative Production and Sale Society Ltd., Chennimalai, Erode 638 051. Appellant(s) Vs The Presiding Officer Labour Court, Salem. and another Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): C.Prakasam For Respondent(s): K.V. Shanmuganathan For RespondentORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble R.Subramanian J.) Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 141 days in representing the above Appeal is condoned. (R.SUBRAMANIAN J.) (C.KUMARAPPAN J.) 30-01-2025 kmi To1. The Presiding Officer Labour Court, Salem....
S.Packiaraj, Vs Mrs. Srividhya,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
Cont.P.No. 254 of 2025P .T.ASHA, J.Since the order passed by this Court on 30.01.2025 has been complied with, no further orders are required to be passed. 31.01.2025 shr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.M.Vinodh Kumar vs the Commissioner of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN H.C.P.No.200 of 2025 N.M.Vinodh Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai.2. Inspector of Police, V6 Police Station, Kolathur.3. Child Welfare Committee,No.300, Purasaiwalkam, Kellyes, Pin - 600 010. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the first and second respondents to produce the petitioner's new born child Jai Dev. N.V. S/o. Vinod Kumar, aged about 16 months baby before this Court from the custody of the 3rd respondent and further to hand over custody of the child to the petitioner herein.For Petitioner : Mr.K.Ashok Kumar For Respondents : Mr. R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public ProsecutorORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The writ of habeas corpus petition has been ins...
U.Prabakaran vs the Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN U.Prabakaran ... Petitioner Vs.4. KumarThe Sub-Inspector of Police, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct respondents 2 to 4 not to harass the petitioner and his family members without any legally sustainable complaint. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Manoj Kumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct respondents 2 to 4 not to harass the petitioner and his family members.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there wasfinancial transaction between the petitioner and the complainant Savithri Murugan, which is purely civil in nature. Despite the civil dispute, the complainant lodged a Police complaint vide CSR No.1165 of 2023 with an intention to harass the petitioner. Under the guise of investigation, the petitioner is repeated...
B.Parimala vs R.Jayamani Alias Jaya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
C.M.P.No.1846 of 2025 in C.R.P.(PD)SR.No.10060 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN C.M.P.No.1846 of 2025 in C.R.P.(PD)SR.No.10060 of 2025 B.Parimala .. Petitioner vs. R.Jayamani Alias Jaya and 27 others .. Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.S.Naveen KumarORDERDispense with ordered.2. The Registry is directed to number the revision, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission. 30.01.2025 kj https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/1...
Shanmugam vs the State Rep by, the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
Crl.M.P.No.1281 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.SR.No.4247 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN, J.Dispense with ordered for the present. 30.01.2025 rsi Note: Registry is directed to number this Criminal Revision, if it is otherwise inorder.https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/1...
F.W.H.Sengutuvan vs the Commissioner of Land Administration
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
in (Filing Number) and (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,) This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' [hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity].2. Captioned WMP has been filed to condone the delay of 158 days in re-presenting the captioned writ petition.3. Mr.K.Arunagiri, learned counsel for petitioner adverting toa portion of paragraph 2 of support affidavit submits that the petitioner has misplaced certain vital documents and hence there was delay in filing the documents sought for by the Registry. Relevant portion of paragraph No.2 of the support affidavit is extracted hereunder:'2. ............................. I state that lost / misplaced of some vital documents, I could not contacted my Advocate to pursue the case, because of the said vital documents was placed in the place which was demolished by the R2 to R5 and the Registry has returned the paper for want of certain documents and also certain details and re...
S.Karthick vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRAS.Karthick S/o. Subramani, No.1/100, Kattapomman Street, Govindhasamy Nagar Rajaannamalaipuram Chennai. Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep By Inspector Of Police, E4, Abhiramapuram Police Station, Chennai. Cr.No.271 Of 2024. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): P.Muthamizhselvakumar A.Esaki Pandy M.Jithendran S.Ramesh Kumar V.G.Nishok V.Suryaprakash For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERLearned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.ham2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 30-01-2025 To1. State Rep By Inspector Of Police, E4, Abhiramapuram Police Station, Chennai. Cr.No.271 Of 2024. HAM...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »