Chennai Orders Court January 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pushkaran Shaji, vs Union of India,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
W.M.P.No.2354 of 2025 in W.P.No.20343 of 2012MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.Though this court granted sufficient time to the respondents to file counter-affidavit, no counter-affidavit is filed as on date. In view of the same, and also for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and also considering the fact that the failure to challenge the proceedings dated 14.05.2012 is only a technical error, though sufficient pleadings have been made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, this court is inclined to permit the amendment of the prayer as sought in this application.2. Accordingly, this application is ordered and the prayer in the main writ petition shall stand amended in terms of the prayer made in this application.3. Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendments and list W.P.No.20343 of 2012 on 05.02.2025. 30.01.2025 skr (1/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Ramasamy vs Through the, Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Ramasamy S/o.Thippana Gowder, Door No.3/4, Mariyamman Kovil Street, Karadimadai, Mathippalaiyam Post, Thenkarai Coimbatore District Tamil Nadu 641 101. Appellant(s) Vs Through The, Inspector Of Police, Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Deepanuday Vengadesh Durairaja V.K. For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.30894 of 2024 by an order dated 11.12.2024 passed by this Court to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner hasbeen regulary complying with the condition imposed by this Court for a period of 32 days and investigation is pending in this matter. 3.Considering the su...
GOPALSAMY Vs ,Through The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA GOPALSAMY C/o.Krishnasamy, Dour.No.3/59, Varaparuthi Thottam, Devanampalayam, and Kinathukadavu, Coimbatore District Tamil Nadu -642 120. Appellant(s) Vs The State of Tamil Nadu,Through The Inspector of Police Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore.( Cr.No.927 of 2024) Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Deepanuday Vengadesh Durairaja .V.K For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.30901 of 2024 by an order dated 11.12.2024 passed by this Court to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner hasbeen regularly complying with the condition imposed by this Court for a period of 30 days and investiga...
Jeevanantham vs State, Represented by, the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA JEEVANANTHAM S/o.Munuswamy, No.16/31, Kamarajar Colony 3rd Street, Kodambakkam, Tamil Nadu - 600 024. Appellant(s) Vs State, Represented By, The Inspector Of Police Tindivanam Police Station, Villupuram District. Crime No.673 Of Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.S.Kamalakanth B.Ragul For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Para 5(b) in Crl.O.P.No.31482 of 2024 by an order dated 17.12.2024 passed by this Court to report before the respondent police everyday at 06.30 p.m., until further orders. A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner hasbeen complying with the condition imposed by this Court for a period of 38 days and investigation is pending in this matter. 3.Considering the submissions...
Govindaswamy vs the State Rep by, Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA 1.Govindaswamy 2.Kanakaraj 3.Kumaresan Appellant(s) Vs The State Rep By, Inspector Of Police State Rep. by its The Inspector of Police Thellar Police Station Thiruvannamalai District. (Crime No.182 of 2024) Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): T.Shanmugam P K Harinath Babu K G Sripathi S Sivasakthi M Inbamaran G Ajith For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.29085 of 2024 by an order dated 04.12.2024 passed by this Court to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period one week and thereafter, every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner hasbeen regularly complying with the condition imposed by this Court and ...
J.Ramesh vs State Rep.by, Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.Ramesh S/o.Jalagandeshwaran Permanent Resident , Santhanakuppam, Ko.Pavazhangudi, Virudhachalam(tk) Cuddalore (dt) Appellant(s) Vs State Rep.By, Inspector Of Police All Women Police Station Virudhachalam, Cr.No.44 Of 2024 Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): A.G.Rajan For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.30286 of 2024 by an order dated 05.12.2024 passed by this Court to report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., for a period two weeks and thereafter, every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner hasbeen regularly complying with the condition imposed by this Court and investigation is pending in this matter. 3.Cons...
Meenachi vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
W.M.P.No.2493 of 2025 in W.P.No.36721 of 2024 W.M.P.No.2493 of 2025 in W.P.No.36721 of 2024D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.When the appeal is already disposed of by the fourth respondent, by the order, dated 09.12.2024, yet anotherorder was also passed on 30.12.2024.2. The amendment is sought for by impugning both the orders also.3. The said amendment is ordered. 30.01.2025 grs Note:- Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments. Page No.1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Amanullah vs State Rep.by,Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA AMANULLAH S/o. Pakker Mohammed, No.27-(2), East Street, Dharapuram, Dalavoipattinam, Tiruppur - 638 672 Appellant(s) Vs State Rep.By,inspector Of Police Chettipalayam Police Station , Coimbatore. In Crime No.426/2024 Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): M/s.S.Selvakumar For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.32656 of 2024 by an order dated 27.12.2024 passed by this Court to report before the respondent police every day at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this Court for a period of 25 days and investigation is pending in this matter.3.Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of...
Thajudeen vs the State Rep by ,Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA THAJUDEEN S/o.Sheik Mohammed Ali, No.53/26, Kannagi Street, Anna Nedumpathai, Avvai Nagar, Choolaimedu Chennai. Appellant(s) Vs The State Rep By ,inspector Of Police N-3 ,Muthialpet Police Station, Chennai. (crime No.89 Of 2023) Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): R.Thamarai Selvan For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis Petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in para 7(b) in Crl.O.P.No.29419 of 2024 by an order dated 12.12.2024 passed by this Court to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., and 5.00 p.m., until further orders.A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.2. The Learned Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularlycomplying with the conditions imposed by this Court for a period of 41 days and the investigation has been completed and final report has been...
Sellappan vs State Rep by, the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA SELLAPPAN S/o. Perumal, NO.223, THIRUVALLUVAR NAGAR, BHAVANI, ERODE DISTRICT. and 2 Others Appellant(s) Vs State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police BHAVANI Police Station, Erode District. (Crime No.728 of 2024) Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): W.Camyles Gandhi For Respondent(s): S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side),madras High Court.ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to extend the time to comply with the condition imposed on the petitioner as per the order dated 19.12.2024 in Crl.O.P.No.31715 of 2024. 2.Heard both sides. 3.Time granted by this Court to comply with the conditions imposed by this Court videorder dated 19.12.2024 in Crl.O.P.No.31715 of 2024 is hereby extended for a period oftwo weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and no further extension of time will be granted to the petitioner. 30-01-2025 Lpp To1. State Rep By, The Inspe...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »