Chennai Madurai Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D. Thangapandi and Others Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Pri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-02-2017
(Prayer: in W.P.(MD) No.16217 of 2016 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Memorandum of Understanding dated 17.04.2015 on the file of the respondent No.2 and quash the same as illegal and consequently for a direction, directing the respondent No.2 to allot 51 Fruit Shops to the petitioners at the newly constructed wholesale fruit market near Mattuthavani, Madurai, by following a fair method of allotment within the time period stipulated by this Court. Prayer in W.P.(MD) No.22960 of 2016 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Ma.Va.3/037969/16 dated 02.11.2016 delivered on 24.11.2016 on the file of the respondent No.2 and quash the same asillegal and consequently for a direction, directing the respondent No.2 to a...
Vallinayaki Vs. The Director of Medical and Rural Health Service, Chen ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-02-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pursuant to the order passed by the 1st respondent through his proceedings in Ref.No.4134/A2/2/2016 dated 14.12.2016 quash the same and consequently directing the 1st respondent to issue pension and all retirement benefits to the petitioner.) 1. The prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pursuant to the order passed by the 1st respondent through his proceedings in Ref.No. 4134/A2/2/2016 dated 14.12.2016, quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue pension and all retirement benefits to the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner is that she served as a Staff Nurse in Thiruvaiyaru Government Hospital, Thanjavur, from 24.05.1991 to 06.06.2004 and thereafter she submitted a resignation letter and the same was accepted. Thereafter, the petitioner made a representation ...
G. Lingaraja Vs. The General Manager, The Tamil Nadu State Transport C ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-02-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the original impugned order in Reference No.Sattam/Sa3/9514/16, dated 9.12.2016 passed by the respondent and to quash the same as illegal, within the time contemplated in the provision of law, without delay.) Order: 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking to quash the impugned order passed by the respondent in Reference No.Sattam/Sa3/9514/16, dated 9.12.2016, rejecting the request of the petitioner to revoke the suspension, in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in Ajay Kumar Choudhary vs. Union of India. 2. The case of the petitioner is that while he was serving as Senior Grade Conductor at Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Madurai) Limited in Sivakasi Branch, the Petitioner was temporarily suspended from service on 11.12.2016, for misappropriation of Corporation fund to the tune of Rs.250/- by re-is...
Naina Mohammed and Others Vs. Mohammed Labbai Gani
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree made in A.S.No.5 of 1998, by the learned Subordinate Judge, Pattukottai, dated 26.06.1998, reversing the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned District Munsif, Pattukottai, in O.S.No.409 of 1991, dated 24.11.1997.) 1. The defeated defendants are the appellants herein. 2. The respondent / plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.409 of 1991, before the learned District Munsif, Pattukottai, for the relief of declaration of title to the suit property, recovery of possession and also for mesne profits. 3. After contest, the learned District Munsif, Pattukottai, by Judgment and Decree, dated 24.11.1997, dismissed the suit with costs. 4. Aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned District Munsif, Pattukottai, the respondent / plaintiff preferred an appeal, in A.S.No. 5 of 1998, before the learned Subordinate Judge, Pattukottai. 5. On re-appreciation of the entire oral and docu...
K. Sekar and Others Vs. State represented by its Secretary, Department ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the respondent No.4 in Mu.Mu.No.6931/a1/2011 dated 02.09.2013 and quash the same as unconstitutional and direct the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioners from the date of their appointment.) 1. The prayer in the writ petition is for a writ of Certioararified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the respondent No.4 in Mu.Mu.No.6931/a1/2011 dated 02.09.2013 and quash the same as unconstitutional and direct the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioners from the date of their appointment. 2. The case of the petitioners are that they were appointed temporarily in Schools under the third respondent jurisdiction by the Parent Teachers Association. The petitioners 1 to 5 were appointed as Sweepers and the 6th petitioner was appointed as Of...
Arulraj Vs. Shanthi
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the Principal Subordinate Court, Thanjavur, in A.S.No.43 of 2012, dated 31.10.2012 confirming the decree and judgment of the District Munsif, Thanjavur in O.S.No. 170 of 2010, dated 26.06.2012.) Common Judgment: 1. S.A.(MD)No.424 of 2013 arises against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.43 of 2012, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Thanjavur, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.170 of 2010, on the file of the District Munsif Curt, Thanjavur. 2. S.A.(MD)No.427 of 2013 arises against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.44 of 2012, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Thanjavur, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.171 of 2010, on the file of the District Munsif Curt, Thanjavur. 3. S.A.(MD)No.475 of 2013 arises against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.41 of 2012, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Cou...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›