Chennai Madurai Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. John Kennedy @ M.J. Kennedy Vs. The Inspector of Police, Thisaiyanv ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to call for the records relating to the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.293 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and quash the same.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying to call for the records in C.C.No.293 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and quash the same. 2. It is averred in the petition that on the basis of the complaint given by the defacto complainant on 08.02.2017, for the alleged occurrence, dated 10.12.2006, a case was registered by the first respondent in Cr.No.19 of 2007 for the offences under Section 457 and 380(NP) of I.P.C. The first respondent, after detailed investigation, filed final report by closing the complaint as mistake of fact on 09.02.2007. The second respondent/defacto complainant, in the mean time filed a Protest Petition before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, seeking a direction to reject the final report...
The District Registrar, Tirunelveli and Others Vs. R. Chidambara Raja ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-15-2017
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 29.04.2016, made in W.P.(MD)No.5956 of 2016.) V.M. Velumani, J. 1. This Writ Appeal has been filed by the appellants challenging the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 29.04.2016, made in W.P. (MD)No.5956 of 2016. 2. The appellants are the respondents and the respondents are the petitioners in W.P.(MD)No.5956 of 2016. The respondents filed the writ petition challenging the order dated 02.03.2016, passed by the third appellant and further forbearing the appellants from taking any proceedings to recover any additional stamp duty and registration fee. 3. According to the respondents, the first respondent's mother Venkittammal @ Sakku Bai entered into an agreement of sale with one Shanmugasundaram Pillai and Rajammal on 02.07.1987 in respect of the property in T.S.No.1605/2B and T.S.No.1606/2, measuring 1 cents and 55 cents respectively. The possession of the said properties were handed over to the f...
N. Samidurai and Others Vs. The Principal Secretary to Government and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-15-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the compulsory retirement order in G.O.2(D) No.272 dated 01.08.2014 on the file of the 1st respondent herein and to quash the same as illegal and further direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all back wages and thereby render justice.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the order of the 1st respondent dated 01.08.2014 passed in G.O.2(D) No.272, by which the petitioner was imposed with the punishment of compulsory retirement. The petitioner also sought a direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all back wages. 2. The case of the petitioner is as follows: i) The petitioner was recruited by the respondent as Grade II Constable and joined the service on 17.01.1986; that in connection with a case in Crime No.67 of 1997, one Krishnamoorthy was secured, for committing rape upo...
M.S. Paramasivam Vs. The Director, Directorate of Town and Country Pla ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-13-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records relating to the impugned proceedings of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.1411/2015 Thiuthiku2 dated 18.09.2015 and the consequential impugned proceedings of the third respondent in Na.ka.No.1411/2015/Thiuthiku 2 dated 27.01.2017 and quash the same as illegal and consequently forbear the respondents from taking any coercive action against the petitioner's building pending disposal of the retention application preferred by the petitioner dated 19.01.2017.) A. Selvam, J. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the proceedings dated 18.09.2015 and 27.01.2017 issued by the third respondent and quash the same, by way of issuing a writ of certiorarified mandamus. 2. It is averred in the petition that the petitioner has put up a building after getting nece...
M. Velmurugan and Another Vs. Union of India Rep by Government of Pudu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-10-2017
(Prayer: Prayer in W.P(MD)No.31798 of 2015: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records from the file of the third respondent dated 28.09.2015 bearing in No.P.E.C/E7/Regularization/2015/No.3035 and quash the same and consequently direct the third respondent to fill up the SC vacancy for the post of Helper in the third respondent's college as per the 2005 notification dated 01.12.2005 in No.693 info/ADVT/2005-2006 and 2008 notification dated 13.03.2008 in No.P.E.C/Est.Sec.4/Employment/2008 by following the communal reservation. Prayer in W.P(MD)No.16816 of 2012: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to fill up the SC vacancy for the post of Helper in the third respondent's college as per the 2005 notification dated 01.12.2005 in No.693 info/ADVT/2005-2006 and 2008 notification dated 13.03.200...
IMC Ltd., rep. by its authorized signatory T.M. Balasubramanian Vs. Tu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-06-2017
(Prayer: Appeal suit is filed under Order XLI, Rule 1 of C.P.C. and under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 08.01.2008 made in O.S.No.13 of 2006 on the file of the District Judge/Fast Track Court No.II, Tuticorin.) P. Kalaiyarasan, J. 1. This appeal suit is directed against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge/F.T.C.No.II, Tuticorin dated 08.01.200 in O.S.No.13 of 2006, dismissing the suit for recovery of sum of Rs.1,30,86,731/- with interest or for an alternative relief of specific performance. 2. The plaint averments are as follows: 2.1. The plaintiffs are carrying on business in handling liquid cargo by providing storage facilities in various Ports throughout India. In response to the tender notice dated 13.02.1998 of the defendant Port Trust as to the allotment of land on lease basis for creation of facilities like Warehouses, Tank Farms, Marine Workshop etc. the plaintiff submitted the tender for Tank Farms for stora...
S. Jeyaraman Vs. The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Thooth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-06-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in connection with the impugned order of suspension passed by him in Na.Ka.9892/2015 Tho.Ve.Koo.Sa. dated 09.12.2016 and quash the same as illegal and ultravires.) 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking to quash the impugned order of suspension passed by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.9892/2015 Tho.Ve.Koo.Sa. dated 09.12.2016. 2. The case of the petitioner is that while he was serving as Secretary in the 3rd respondent society, an inspection was conducted based on a complaint that irregularities took place in Agricultural Loan Waiving Scheme in the society. In the inspection, it was found that the loan amount was waived for 19 survey numbers which were not found in the village records for the Fasli 1424 and 1425 and further there is no records showing cultivation of plantain in Saminatham and South Veerapandiapuram...
S.R. Mohideen Abdul Khader Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by S ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-06-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order in O.Mu.No.2594/Aa4/2016 dated 21.07.2016 passed by the 3rd respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to approve the petitioner's appointment for the post of Junior Assistant in the 4th respondent school with effect from 02.05.2016 with all consequential benefits.) This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the order of the 3rd respondent in O.Mu.No.2594/Aa4/2016 dated 21.07.2016 vide which, the 3rd respondent has returned the proposal, on the ground that approval could be considered after receiving the order from the Government on seniority basis. The petitioner also sought a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to approve the petitioner's appointment for the post of Junior Assistant in the 4th respondent school with effect from 02.05.2016 with all consequenti...
Ravichandran Vs. State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Vallio ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-03-2017
(Prayer: Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records pertaining to the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.5273 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vallioor, dated 25.10.2016 and set aside the same and pass any other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper as to the circumstances to this case.) 1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed praying to call for the records pertaining to the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.5273 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vallioor, dated 25.10.2016 and set aside the same. 2. Brief facts, in nutshell, are as under:- The case was registered in Crime No.288 of 2016 on 16.09.2016, for the offence under Section 379 of IPC., r/w Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, against the petitioner herein and three others by the respondent Police. The FIR reveals the fact that on 16.09.2016 at about 5.00 p.m., a Tempo [TATA 407 Mini Lorry] bea...
U. Joseph Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpor ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-03-2017
(Prayer: in W.P.(MD) 6902/2014: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 13.02.2012 in his reference Tha.A.Po.Ka./TAS/D3/1087AA and the order dated 28.03.2012 in his reference No.Tha.A.Po.Ka./KUMBA/PUMA/E2/155 and quash the same and to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue as a Driver in the Transport Corporation till the date of superannuation on 31.05.2015 and to pay back wages for the period from 01.04.2012 to till date and to continue to pay salary every month. Prayer in W.P.(MD) 23615/2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Declaration, declaring the action of the respondents in imposing a recovery of Rs.98,000/- on the petitioner towards uneffected increment cut and recovering the said amount from his terminal benefits as illegal, arbitrary and ...