Chennai Madurai Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vetrivel Explosives Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Direc ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-27-2017
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order made by the second respondent in R.C.No.D2/23317/2016, dated 17.12.2016 and to quash the same as illegal.) 1. This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order of the second respondent, dated 17.12.2016 cancelling the No Objection Certificate issued under the Explosives Act, 1884. 2. The case of the Petitioner, in short, is as follows: The Petitioner/Company is a private limited company engaged in the business of manufacture, sale and export of explosives for industrial purposes permitted under the Explosives Act, 1884. The Petitioner/company established a factory in Murangampatti Village, Thuraiyur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. The said factory premises was established after obtaining all statutory permissions and clearances as required under the Explosives Act, 1884 and the rules made thereunder. The sec...
Jakumar Christudoss and Others Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Poli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-24-2017
(Prayer: Criminal original petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.200 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai and quash the proceedings as against the petitioner herein.) 1. This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.200 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai as against the petitioner herein. 2. It is averred in the petition that the second respondent lodged a complaint in the first respondent police and charge sheet has been laid against the petitioners alleging that the petitioners joined together and created forged documents by amending the survey number from 5/3B-2D2 to 5/3B-2D3 so as to grab 13 cents land belonging to the defacto complainant. The first respondent has not conducted the investigation properly. He has not even noticed the death of the first accused even before lodging the complaint. Without analy...
S. Rajeswari and Others Vs. N. Rasayee and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-24-2017
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 09.11.2011 made in A.S.No.12 of 2011 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Karur, confirming the judgment and decree dated 01.10.2010 made in O.S.No.987 of 2005, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Karur.) 1. Challenging the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.12 of 2011, on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Karur, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.987 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Karur, the plaintiffs have filed the above Second Appeal. 2. The plaintiffs filed the suit in O.S.No.987 of 2005 to declare the registered sale deed dated 03.01.1994 in respect of the suit property executed by the defendants 1 to 5 in favour of the sixth defendant is null and void and consequently, directing the sixth defendant to surrender the possession of the suit property to the plaintiffs 3 to 6. 3. The br...
Sri Krishna Educational Trust, Rep. by its Managing Trustee K. Balaram ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-24-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under section 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the information Brochure, under Graduate admission 2015, The Tamil Nadu Agricultural University dated Nil issued by the 4th respondent and quash the same insofar as collecting first year fee as prescribed by Tamil Nadu Government from the candidates admitted during counselling under TNAU Quota (50 %) in Private affiliated colleges and further direct the respondents to permit the petitioner form collecting the first year fee prescribed by Tamil Nadu Govt. from the candidates admitted during counselling under TNAU quota (50%).) 1. The petitioner Educational Trust is running a college, namely, College of Agricultural Technology at Theni, Theni District for offering B.Sc., (Agri) degree course. The present writ petition is filed challenging the Information Brochure, Under Graduate admission 2015, issued by the Tamil...
Manickam Vs. Chinnammal and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-24-2017
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.4 of 2009, dated 29.04.2010, on the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukkottai, concurrent the judgment passed in O.S.No.106 of 2006, dated 05.11.2007, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Pudukkottai. Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.3 of 2009, dated 29.04.2010, on the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukkottai, concurrent the judgment passed in O.S.No.106 of 2006, dated 05.11.2007, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Pudukkottai.) Common Judgment: 1. The Second Appeal in S.A.(MD)No.24 of 2011 arises against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.4 of 2009, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Pudukkottai reversing the judgment and decree passed in the counter claim in O.S.No.106 of 2006, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Pudukkottai. The Se...
Dr. Thiravium and Others Vs. L. Wilfred Raj
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-24-2017
(Prayer: Criminal original petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.222 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil and quash the same.) Order: 1. This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.222 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Nagercoil. 2. It is averred in the petition that the respondent's wife Tmt.Vimala Rani was admitted in the petitioners' hospital on 16.05.2008 for right hip pain, which was present for five years. After preliminary investigation and treatment, she was suggested right hip replacement surgery as other measures had failed. After getting consent and proper fitness, surgery was performed on 25.05.2008 under anesthesia. During reaming of femur, thigh bone, so as to fit into the joint cavity, fat present in femur got dislodged and resulted in fatt embolism. Fat embolism caused pulmonary embolism finally ending up w...
M. Chandra Prabha Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by its Secretary to ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-21-2017
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 4th respondent in his proceedings in O.Mu.No.320/A-2/2015 dated 6.7.15 and quash the same as illegal and consequentially to direct the 4th respondent to approve the appointment of the petitioner as B.T.Assistant (Mathematics) w.e.f.16.6.2011 without reference to Teacher Eligibility Test in conformity with the judgement rendered by the Honourable Court in the case of Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust and other Vs.Union of India and others reported in (2014) 4 MLJ 486 (SC). ) Nisha Banu, J. The above Writ Petition has been filed challenging the rejection of the approval of the appointment of the petitioner as B.T.Assistant (Mathematics) w.e.f.16.6.2011 by the fourth respondent school on the ground that she did not possess the teacher eligibility test (in short 'TET'). 2. The case of the ...
The Indian Hume Pipe Company Limited, Through its Power Agent, Ajay As ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-21-2017
(Prayer: Appeal suit is filed under Section 96 and Order XLI, Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.86 of 2004 dated 22.11.2006 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.3, Madurai.) P. Kalaiyarasan, J. 1. This appeal suit has been filed by the plaintiff as against the judgment and decree of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.3, Madurai dated 10.11.2006 in O.s.No.86 of 2004, dismissing the suit for recovery of amount and decreeing the counter claim in part with cost. 2. The plaint averments are as follows: 2.1. The plaintiff is a limited Company engaged in undertaking civil works relating to laying, jointing, testing and commissioning of pipe lines. This suit has been filed by the power agent of the company. The first defendant is a partnership firm, wherein, the defendants 2 to 4 are partners. The contract was concluded as between the plaintiff's company and TWAD board of Tamil Nadu...
P. Beula Vs. Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Rep. by its Registrar, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
(Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the 1st respondent bearing MSU/CD/QAFIP/NMC 2/2010, dated 06.09.2010 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to approve the petitioner's qualification.) 1. Aggrieved against the order, dated 06.09.2010 whereby, the petitioner's request for qualification approval was rejected on the ground that NET/SLET shall remain the minimum recruitment for appointment as lecturer in the respondent college, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. 2. Pending the Writ Petition, when the issue was dealt with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a judgment reported in (2015) 8 SCC 129 (P.Suseela and Ors. V. University Grants Commission), while holding that the UGC Regulations prescribing NET/SLET/SET as minimum eligibility condition for appointment of Lecturers/Assistant Professors in higher educational institutions as val...
Sarjan Realities Private Limited and Others Vs. Aathilingaperumal
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
(Prayer: Appeal suit is filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 25.11.2011 passed in O.S.No.181 of 2009 on the file of the District Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.) P. Kalaiyarasan, J. 1. This appeal suit is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil dated 25.11.2011 in O.S.No.181 of 2009, decreeing the suit for specific performance of contract and permanent injunction. 2. The plaint averments are as follows: 2.1. The first defendant Sarjan Realities Private Limited is engaged in the business of purchasing, selling and otherwise dealing in land for itself and for others for setting up of wind farm projects. The second defendant is the Director of the first defendant company and third defendant is the power of attorney and authorised signatory of the first defendant company under power of attorney deed dated 27.06.2003. The third defendant, as the power of attorney ...