Chennai Madurai Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Elberthammal Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary to G ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the files of the 4th respondent pertaining to its order bearing Athi.Mu.No.7446/A2/12 dated 19.12.2012 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to regularize the service of the petitioner as Junior Assistant with effect from 02.07.2012 by considering the proposal resubmitted on 24.05.2016 and to disburse all the monetary benefits consequent to the same from the date of appointment.) Order: 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the order of the 4th respondent passed in Athi.Mu.No.7446/A2/12, dated 19.12.2012, vide which, the 4th respondent has returned the proposal of the 5th respondent school, to re-submit the same along with original educational certificate, prior approval from the Director of School Education of the previous candidate, relieving order endorsed by the District Educational ...
Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Vs. M. Santhi and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 12.03.2015, made in M.C.O.P.No.2059 of 2012, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - cum VI Additional District Judge, Madurai.) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant-Insurance Company against the award of Rs.14,26,500/- (Rupees Fourteen Lakhs Twenty Six Thousand and Five Hundred only) for the death of one M.Ravikumar, aged about 19 years, First Year B.Sc., (Maths) student, in the accident occurred on 02.05.2012, when he was riding his bicycle on Madurai Dindigul Main Road in the east-west direction, the bus owned by the fourth respondent herein insured with the appellant-Insurance Company driven in a rash and negligent manner came behind and hit the bicycle causing the accident. 2. Heard Mrs.K.R.Shiva Shankari, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan, learned Counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company and Mr.M.Sarangan, learne...
V. Sowmiya Narayanan Vs. Velachi Reddiar
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 25.02.2016, made in I.A.No.39 of 2015 in O.S.No.18 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Court, Pudukottai.) Order: 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 25.02.2016, made in I.A.No.39 of 2015 in O.S.No.18 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Court, Pudukottai. 2. The revision petitioner is the first defendant in the suit in O.S.No.18 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Court, Pudukottai. The first respondent, who is the plaintiff in the suit, has filed the said suit for specific performance of the agreement of sale, dated 11.06.2008. 3. The revision petitioner filed a written statement on 31.08.2009 disputing the signature in the agreement of sale, dated 11.06.2008 and filed I.A.No.22 of 2010 to send the admitted signature of the petitioner and the disputed signature found in t...
Dr. K. Senthil, The President, The Tamil Nadu Medical Council, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned resolution of the third respondent Council dated 17.08.2016 and the consequential proceeding issued by the third respondent Registrar in Ref. No.TNMC/G 705/2016, dated 17.08.2016 and to quash the same.) 1. The minutes of the Executive Committee Meeting of the Tamil Nadu Medical Council, Chennai, dated 17.08.2016, reads as under:- The Executive Committee Meeting of the Tamil Nadu Medical Council resolves to accept the resignation of Dr.K.Senthil, President, Tamil Nadu Medical Council, submitted on 12.08.2016 and Dr.A.Jayalal, Vice-President, to continue as President In-charge of the Tamil Nadu Medical Council. 1.1. This impugned resolution, dated 17.08.2016, of the Executive Committee of the Tamil Nadu Medical Council, Chennai, (second respondent) allegedly accepting the alleged resignation of the President, Dr.K.Senthi...
M/s. Villavarayar and Sons Vs. The Commissioner of Customs, Custom Hou ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against the Final Order No.40670/2016, dated 21.04.2016 in Appeal No.C/40651/2015-SM passed by the second respondent.) R. Subbiah, J. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the Final Order No.40670/2016, dated 21.04.2016 in Appeal No.C/40651/2015-SM passed by the second respondent. 2. The appellant herein filed shipping bills on behalf of the exporter M/s.Seshasayee Paper and Boards Limited to export (a) plain paper (b) copier paper (c) colour printing paper (d) kraft paper (e) M.G. poster paper and (f) maplitho paper under claim for drawback. The rate of drawback for the plain paper and copier paper was 4.4% and for the rest of the paper, it was 2.4%. However, by mistake, the rate of drawback was mentioned as 4.4% as against the correct rate of 2.4% applicable to the MG poster paper exported. The Department also sanctioned the amount as classified without noticing the excess rate of drawback mentioned in...
Parasakthi Picture Mart, Rep. by Partner, S. Vairaprakasam, Sivakasi V ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of respondent in CST:489551/95-96 dated 16.07.2010 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, barred by limitation, violative of the provisions of Section 22 of the TNGST Act, 1959 and against the Principals of Natural Justice.) 1. The prayer in the writ petition is for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of respondent in CST:489551/95-96 dated 16.07.2010 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, barred by limitation, violative of the provisions of Section 22 of the TNGST Act, 1959 and against the Principles of Natural Justice. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he is carrying on business on execution of printing works and he is an assessee on the file of the respondent under the Central Sales Tax Act 1956 and erstwhile Tamil Nadu General Sales Act, 1959. For the assessment year 1995-96 (CST) the petitioner reported ...
C. Kathiresan Vs. The Commissioner for Milk Production and Dairy Devel ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-10-2017
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned revision order in RC No.22771/10/M1 dated 18.06.2011 and consequential review order in RC.No.11335/11 M1 dated 20.08.2011 passed by the 1st respondent and to quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 1st respondent to take the review petition dated 10.07.2011 filed by the petitioner on file and pass orders on merits in accordance with law within the period that may stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned revision order in RC No. 22771/10/M1 dated 18.06.2011, and consequential review order in RC.No.11335/11 M1 dated 20.08.2011, passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to take the review petition dated 10.07.2011, filed by the petitio...
G. Samikalai Vs. Sengamalanachiarpuram Kammavar Sangam, represented by ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-09-2017
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the concurrent judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.6 of 2009 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sivakasi, dated 30.10.2010 confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.223 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif, Sivakasi, dated 19.01.2009.) 1. The 13th defendant in the suit in O.S.No.223 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sivakasi, is the appellant in the above Second Appeal. 2. The respondents 1 and 2 herein, as plaintiffs, filed the suit in O.S.No.223 of 2002 for declaration of title and recovery of possession from defendants 1 to 8 and 13 in respect of the suit first schedule property and for declaration of title and recovery of possession from defendants 9 to 13 in respect of suit second schedule property. The suit is also for a consequential permanent injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the suit property or from putting up any construction in the suit prop...
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-06-2017
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the Labour Court, Tirunelveli, in I.D.No.10 of 2003, dated 30.04.2010 and to quash the same as illegal and invalid.) 1. The petitioner Corporation challenging the award passed by the second respondent in I.D.No.10 of 2003, dated 30.04.2010, has come out with the present writ petition. 2. The first respondent was a conductor working at the petitioner's Corporation. While so, a charge memo was issued against him on 08.01.2002. Based on which domestic enquiry was conducted and ultimately pursuant to the domestic enquiry, the petitioner was removed from service. Challenging the said removal of service, the first respondent raised Industrial Dispute by filing I.D.No.10 of 2003 on the file of the second respondent. 3. By order dated 29.03.2010, a preliminary award was passed, whereby the Labour Court found that the domest...
Sanga Pillai and Another Vs. Mariyayee Ammal
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., against the fair and decretal order, dated 11.10.2013, passed in I.A.No.162 of 2010 in I.A.No.355 of 2007 in O.S.No.250 of 2000, by the learned District Munsif, Vedasandur.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decretal order, dated 11.10.2013, passed in I.A.No.162 of 2010 in I.A.No.355 of 2007 in O.S.No.250 of 2000, by the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur. 2. Facts of the case: (i) The petitioners are the defendants 1 and 3. The respondent is the plaintiff and she filed the suit in O.S.No.250 of 2000, on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Vedasandur, for partition. (ii) The petitioners entered appearance through Advocate and subsequently, they did not file written statement and contest the suit. Therefore, an ex-parte preliminary decree was passed on 06.12.2001. (iii) The respondent filed I.A.No.251 of 2005 for passing of final decre...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »