Chennai Madurai Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C. Anantha Raj and Another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Princi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
(Prayer: in W.P.(MD) No.12456 of 2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to provide MRI scan facilities to all district Government hospital in the state of Tamil Nadu, within the time stipulated by this Court, consequently, to direct the respondents to provide MRI scan facilities on free of cost to the patients living below the poverty line throughout the State of Tamil Nadu. Prayer: in W.P.(MD) No.23805 of 2016 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to provide portable drinking water and hot water to the patients in all wards, direct the respondents to ensure the available of the doctors for the patients for 24 hours by filling all existing vacancies, and to provide MRI scan facility, and other infrastructure to the Government Headquarters hospital, Ramanathapuram, within the time stipulated by this Court.) Common Order: A. Selvam, J. 1. These writ petitio...
K. Pandi Vs. The Chief Engineer(Personal), Tamil Nadu Electricity Boar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd Respondent in his proceedings TAMIL dated 23-04-2009 and quash the same as illegal and consequentially to direct the Respondents to give upgradation as Line Inspector w.e.f. 01-01-1994 along with consequential benefits thereon within the period that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. The prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd Respondent in his proceedings TAMIL dated 23-04-2009, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to give upgradation as Line Inspector with effect from 01-01-1994 along with consequential benefits within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner was appointed as Adhoc employee in the 2nd respondent circle during 1...
M/s. Golden Pipe Company, Represented by its Managing Partner S. Abdul ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
(Prayer: in WP(MD)No.737/2017 : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in TIN 33303565598/2011-12 dated 30.11.2016 and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and against the judgment of this Hon'ble Court reported in the case of Infiniti Wholesale Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT), Koyambedu Assessment Circle, Chennai, reported in [2015] 82 VST 457 and further direct the respondent to afford a opportunity of personal hearing and consider the relevant records and representation dated 27.12.2016 and thereafter to pass order afresh. Prayer: in WP(MD)No.738/2017 : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in TIN 33303565598/2012-13 dated 30.11.2016 and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and against the judgment of this Honourable Court reported in the case of Infiniti Wholesale Limited Vs. Assistant Co...
Cholan Transport Engineering Workers Union 97/TAJ, Rep.by its General ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-12-2017
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree of the Additional Subordinate Judges Court, Thanjavur, passed in A.S.No.8 of 2004, dated 04.02.2005, reversing the decree and judgment of the Principal District Munsif Court, Kumbakonam, passed in O.S.No.150 of 1998, dated 27.04.2000.) 1. The unsuccessful plaintiff is the appellant herein. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per the ranking before the Trial Court. 3. The plaintiff Union filed the suit, in O.S.No.150 of 1998, before the learned Principal District Munsif, Kumbakonam, for the relief of injunction restraining the defendants from collecting professional tax from the members of their Union on the ground that no prior notice for levy of professional tax was issued and there was no order for levy of professional tax. 4. After contest, the learned Principal District Munsif, Kumbakonam, by Judgment and Decree, dated 27.04.2000, decreed the suit. 5. Ag...
K. Bhaskar and Others Vs. R. Thiyagarajan and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
(Prayer: Writ Appeal (MD).No.1221 of 2016 and Writ Appeal (MD).SR.No.47454 of 2016 filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order, dated 15.06.2016 passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.(MD).No.8439 of 2015 on the file of this Court. C.M.P.(MD).No.11934 of 2016 in W.A.(MD).SR.No.47454 of 2016 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 127 days in filing appeal against the order, dated 15.06.2016 in W.P.(MD).No.8439 of 2015 on the file of this Court.) Common Judgment: R. Subbiah, J. 1. Since W.A.(MD).No.1221 of 2016 and W.A.(MD).SR.No.47454 of 2016 arise out of the same judgment, they are disposed of by this common judgment. 2. Aggrieved by the order dated 15.06.2016 passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.(MD).No.8439 of 2015, the fourth respondent in W.P.(MD).No. 8439 of 2015 has filed W.A.(MD).No.1221 of 2016 and the State has preferred W.A.(MD).SR.No.47454 of 2016, along with the petition for condonation of delay of 127 days in filing th...
The Manager, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Others Vs. A. Rajari ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 29.01.2007, made in M.C.O.P.No.104 of 2004, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - cum District Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.) Prayer: Petition filed under Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 29.01.2007, made in M.C.O.P.No.104 of 2004, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - cum District Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.) Common Judgment 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Insurance Company against the award of Rs.3,88,652/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Eighty Eight Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty Two only) for the death of one Aloysious, a retired Subedar of Indian Army, aged about 5 years and re-employed as an Accountant in C.S.D. Canteen of 11th Tamil Nadu N.C.C. Battalion, earning about Rs.9,586/- (Rupees Nine Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty Six only), in the accident occurred...
State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its District Collector, Kanyakumari Distri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 14.02.2014 in E.P.No.28 of 2013 in O.S.No.227 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram.) The petitioners have filed this Civil Revision Petition to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 14.02.2014 in E.P.No.28 of 2013 in O.S.No.227 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram. 2. The petitioners are respondents in E.P.No.28 of 2013 and defendants in O.S.No.227 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram. In the Judgement and decree dated 25.06.20102 in O.S.No.227 of 2010, the trial Court held that Family Card being numbered 30/G/0271174 issued by the petitioners to the respondent is genuine and respondent is entitled to get ration articles from July 2012 and a sum of Rs.10,000/- was awarded as compensation. 3. The petitioners filed A.S.No.76 of 2012 on the file of...
National Insurance Company Limited, Karur by its Senior Branch Manager ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 29.11.2013, made in M.C.O.P.No.436 of 2011, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - cum ? Principal District Judge, Karur.) 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Insurance Company against the fixing of liability on the driver of the bus insured with the appellant-Insurance Company and awarding a sum of Rs.10,35,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs and Thirty Five Thousand only) for the death of one K.Rajendran, aged about 35 years, a lorry driver and an agriculturalist, earning about Rs.8,000/- (Rupees Eight Thousand only), in the accident occurred on 01.03.2011, when he was riding his two wheeler from south to north, which was hit by the bus driven in a rash and negligent manner coming from north to south side. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company. 3. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company tha...
J. Kannan Vs. The Managing Director, Tamilnadu Transport Corporation, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus by calling for the records pertaining to the order of the 1st respondent in his TNSTC/Madurai/P.F8/C.R.11179 Dated 27.02.2012 quash the same as illegal and consequence thereof directing the 2nd respondent to pay pension benefit to the petitioner.) 1. The prayer in the writ petition is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus by calling for the records pertaining to the order of the 1st respondent in his TNSTC/Madurai/P.F8/C.R.11179 Dated 27.02.2012 quash the same as illegal and consequence thereof directing the 2nd respondent to pay pension benefit to the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he joined in service as Conductor at the respondent Corporation on 27.11.1983. He was removed from service within the probation period and has been reinstated on 26.07.1985, pursuant to the settlement arrived under Section 18(1) of Industrial Disputes Act. Thereafte...
Dr. David Raja Bose and Others Vs. R. Issac Robi and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-11-2017
(Prayer: in C.R.P.(MD)No.2378/2016.: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 07.10.2016, made in I.A.No.369 of 2016 in O.S.No.9 of 2016 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. Prayer: in C.R.P.(MD)No.2435/2016.: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 07.10.2016, made in I.A.No.368 of 2016 in I.A.No.26 of 2016 in O.S.No.9 of 2016 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.) Common Order: 1. These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 07.10.2016, made in I.A.Nos.369 and 368 of 2016 in O.S.No.9 of 2016, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2. Since the issues involved in both the Civil Revision Petitions are one and the same, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order. 3. Facts ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »