Chennai Madurai Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C. Paramasamy Vs. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the 3rd respondent in Se.Mu.Aa.No.879/1999/M dated 27.02.2009, and quash the same. ) 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the 3rd respondent in Se.Mu.Aa.No.879/1999/M dated 27.02.1999 and quash the same. 2. The Petitioner has challenged the order of recovery of Rs. 84, 542/- from his salary on the ground that the impugned order is passed by violating the principles of natural justice. The petitioner was joined as Driver in the Forest Department on 21.09.1992. On 03.04.1997 when the petitioner was worked as Jeep Driver in the Forest Department, a motor cycle driven by a person in a race and negligence manner, dashed the stationed jeep and in the result two persons injured in the said accident. Thou...
M. Manikandan Vs. The Sub Registrar, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in registering the impugned cancellation deed of sale in Document No.876/2000 dated 25.02.2000 executed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further direct the 1st respondent to make corresponding entry in the Book No.1 of his office and pass orders on merits.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the writ petitioner seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in registering the impugned cancellation deed of sale in Document No.876/2000 dated 25.02.2000 executed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further direct the 1st respondent to make corresponding entry in the Book No.1 of his office and pass orders on merits. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the owner of nanja lands to an extent of 25 cents on the western side in Re-survey No.115/10...
M. Thangadurai Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the office bearers of the third respondent from interfering with the petitioner's lawful right and discharging his duties as clerk as per the order dated 08.08.2011 with the third respondent office.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the office-bearers of the 3rd respondent from discharging his duties as Clerk, as per order dated 08.08.2011. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the resident of Mullipallam Village and he studied upto 12th standard at Vivekananda Higher Secondary School, Thiruvedagam. He was doing agricultural work and thereby eaking out his lively hood. It is the further case of the petitioner that on 05.08.2011 one Sumathi, who was working as the clerk of respondent Panchayat, was promoted and transferred to different place, hence, the post of clerk felt vacant....
M. Vijayan Vs. The Agricultural Production Commissioner and Principal ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent relating to impugned orders of the Government passed in fbj vz;.18201/Ntep4(2)/2012-2 dated 03.05.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the Government to regularise services of the petitioner as per the proposals sent by the Commissioner of Agriculture in his letter No.Nt.mg1/70289/2012 dated 05.07.2012 and sanction arrear increments within a specified time frame that may be fixed by this Court.) 1. The prayer in the writ petition is for a writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent relating to impugned orders of the Government passed in TAMIL (2)/2012-2 dated 03.05.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the Government to regularise services of the petitioner as per the proposals sent by the Commissioner of Agriculture in his letter No.Nt.mg1/70289/2012 dated 0...
Fathima and Others Vs. Noorjahan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-19-2017
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.52 of 2007, on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Dindigul, dated 24.06.2011 confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.1356 of 2004, on the file of I Additional District Munsif Court, Dindigul, dated 06.09.2006.) 1. The above Second Appeal arises against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.52 of 2007, on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Dindigul confirming the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.1356 of 2004 on the file of I Additional District Munsif Court, Dindigul. 2. The plaintiffs are the appellants and the respondent is the defendant in the suit. The plaintiffs filed the suit in O.S.No.1356 of 2004 for declaration, injunction and recovery of possession. 3. The brief case of the plaintiffs is as follows: (i) According to the plaintiffs, the suit properties originally belonged to one Seshasala Naidu. Ramanuja Naidu, Seenivasan ...
S. Jothinathan Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Go ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
(This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in proceedings D.No.804/2013 dated 06.12.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant monetary benefits in accordance with the existing rules.) J. Nisha Banu, J. 1. This Writ Petition has been filed against the order of the second respondent dated 06.12.2013, whereby, he has ordered for recovery of excess payment granted to the petitioner. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he was appointed as typist on 05.11.2008 by the Principal District Judge, Erode based on the employment seniority and posted in the 1st Additional Munsif Court, Bhavani in the existing vacancy place and he was granted time scale of Rs.3200-85-4900. Subsequently, he was transferred to several Courts in Erode District and continued his service under the control of the District Pri...
Bhoothanatha Pillai Vs. Manickavasagam Pillai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
(Prayer: in both the C.R.Ps.: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 29.11.2016, passed in I.A.Nos.410 and 411 of 2016 in O.S.No.209 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Nagercoil.) Common Order: 1. These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed to set aside the order dated 29.11.2016, passed in I.A.Nos.410 and 411 of 2016 in O.S.No.209 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Nagercoil. 2. Since the issues involved in both the Civil Revision Petitions are one and the same, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order. 3. Facts of the case:- (i) The petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondents are the defendants in O.S.No.209 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Nagercoil. The petitioner filed the suit for declaration of title and possession of the plaint schedule property and for permanent injunction. According to the petitioner, the suit schedul...
V. Sowpakkiyavathi Vs. K. Gnanasekaran
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 16.09.2016, passed in E.A.No.30 of 2016 in E.P.No.16 of 2013 in Tr.O.P.No.1 of 2007, on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Vadipatti.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 16.09.2016, passed in E.A.No.30 of 2016 in E.P.No.16 of 2013 in Tr.O.P.No.1 of 2007, on the file of the District Munsif-cum- Judicial Magistrate Court, Vadipatti. 2. Facts of the case:- (i) The petitioner is the first respondent in E.P.No.16 of 2013 and Tr.O.P.No.1 of 2007. The respondent is the petitioner in both the E.P. and the Tr.O.P. The respondent filed a petition in Tr.O.P.No.1 of 2007 under Section 83 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'] before the District Munsif Court, Madurai Taluk and the same was allowed. The said order has been transmitted to the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, V...
The Management Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. Madurai Divi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned award dated 28.01.2010 passed by the 2nd respondent in I.D.No. 130 of 2007 and quash the same.) 1. The prayer in the writ petition is for a Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned award dated 28.01.2010 passed by the 2nd respondent in ID No.130/2007 and to quash the same. 2. The 1st respondent is a Driver, who was working at the petitioner Corporation. While he was driving the petitioner Corporation Bus on 25.04.2003, the bus met with an accident, as the said bus hit a stationed lorry at the backside, in which, one person died and five were injured. Pursuant to which, the first respondent was suspended on 28.04.2003. Thereafter, a charge memo was issued, domestic enquiry was conducted. After completing the domestic enquiry, the first respondent was dismissed from service on 09.03.2004. Challenging the s...
S. Manonmony, Technical Assistant, Dr. T.P.M. Library, Madurai Vs. The ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-18-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to promote the Petitioner as Assistant Librarian at Dr.T.P.M.Library of Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai as per the resolution / order passed by the Syndicate of Madurai Kamaraj University in its meeting held on 03.02.2011.) Order: 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition praying for a direction to the respondents to promote the petitioner as 'Assistant Librarian' at Dr.T.P.M.Library of Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, as per the resolution/order passed by the Syndicate of Madurai Kamaraj University in its meeting held on 03.02.2011. 2. The case of the Petitioner is that she joined Madurai Kamaraj University as a Stack Room Assistant in Dr.T.P.M.Library on 19.09.1991 vide order dated 18.09.1991 issued by the Second Respondent, the Registrar of Madurai Kamaraj University. At the time of appointment, she had qualified B.Sc., B....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »