Chennai Madurai Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anthonysamy Vs. Ilayaperumal @ Vellapandi Nadar (Died) and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the executable and fair order, dated 01.06.2016, made in E.P.No.142 of 1990 in O.S.No.1052 of 1987, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Ambasamudram.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the executable and fair order, dated 01.06.2016, made in E.P.No.142 of 1990 in O.S.No.1052 of 1987, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Ambasamudram. 2. The petitioner is the first defendant in the suit in O.S.No. 1052 of 1987 and first respondent in E.P.No.142 of 1990 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Ambasamudram. The father of the respondents 1 to 6 viz., Ilayaperumal @ Vellapandi Nadar is the plaintiff/decree-holder and the respondents 7 and 8 are the defendants 2 and 3. The plaintiff/father of the respondents 1 to 6 viz., Ilayaperumal @ Vellapandi Nadar [since deceased] filed O.S.No.1052 of 1987 against the petitioner [first defendant] ...
A.T. Jacob and Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Sub Inspecto ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer: Criminal original petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.185 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Nagercoil and quash the same.) 1. This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., paying to call for the records in C.C.No.185 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Nagercoil and quash the same. 2. It is averred in the petition that the second respondent initially preferred a complaint before the District Crime Branch against the petitioners and a case was registered in crime No.31 of 2007 under Section 153(A) of I.P.C. and after thorough investigation, the investigating agency dropped further action. The second respondent filed a protest petition in the said case. The Judicial Magistrate, by order dated 19.08.2009 took the case on file against the petitioners and three others, who are now no more. As per Section 196(1) of Cr.P.C., no Court shall take cognizance of a...
S.M. Pitchai Pandian and Others Vs. P. Seenivasan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.799 of 2016 pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Madurai.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.799 of 2016 pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Madurai. 2. The petitioners are the defendants and the respondent is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.799 of 2016 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Madurai. The respondent filed the suit for declaration to declare that the Office Bearers elected in the Election held on 25.09.2016 for the period 2016 2019 is valid and binding on the petitioners/defendants and their men or agents and also for permanent injunction restraining the petitioners/defendants and their men and agent from in any way interfering into the Management and affairs of the respondent's/plaintiff's Society. According to the respondent, as per Bye-laws, the elec...
Rajendran Vs. Murugaiah
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the code of Civil Procedure, challenging the fair and decreetal order, dated 03.10.2013, made in I.A.No.247 of 2013 in O.S.No.7 of 2011, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pudukottai.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the fair and decreetal order, dated 03.10.2013, made in I.A.No.247 of 2013 in O.S.No.7 of 2011, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pudukottai. 2. The petitioner is third defendant and the respondent is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.7 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pudukottai. The respondent filed the suit for specific performance and also for permanent injunction. The petitioner remained ex-parte in the suit and an ex-parte decree was passed on 04.08.2011. Therefore, the petitioner filed I.A.No.247 of 2013 to condone the delay in filing application to set aside the ex-parte decree. According to the petitioner, the date of hearing of the suit was 09....
C. Anand Raj Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Principal Secreta ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to strictly implement Bio Metric attendance system in all the Government Medical College Hospitals and attached institutions, Government Medical Colleges, Government District Head Quarters Hospitals, Government Hospitals, Taluk and Non Taluk Hospitals, ESI Hospitals/dispensaries and Primary Health Centers to monitor and regulate the attendance of all the staff working in the above hospitals, by strictly implementing the G.O.(Ms)No.277 Respondent No.1, dated 20.09.2012 within the time stipulated by this Court.) A. Selvam, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to implement Bio-metric Attendance System in all Government Medical College Hospitals, District Headquarters Hospitals and Taluk Headquarters Hospitals in pursuance of G.O.(Ms)No.277, Health and Famil...
R. Selvan Vs. State through the Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Ant ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-24-2017
(Prayer: Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records pertaining to impugned order, dated 20.09.2016 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Special Judge, Dindigul in Cr.M.P.No.895 of 2016 in Spl.Case No.4 of 2014, set aside the same and direct the trial Court to defer the cross examination of P.W.3 till L.W.4 and L.W.11 are examined in chief in the interest of justice and fair trial.) 1. The Revision Petitioner herein is an accused in Spl.Case No.4 of 2014 pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Special Judge, Dindigul. While P.W.3 was produced before the Court by prosecution and was examined in chief by the prosecutor and the respondent herein, the Revision Petitioner/accused filed a petition in Cr.M.P.No.895 of 2016 on 20.09.2016, under Section 242(3) of Cr.P.C, for deferring the cross examination of P.W.3, till L.Ws.4 and 11 are examined in chief and the said petition was dismissed by the trial Court, referring the de...
S. Sekar Vs. The Regional Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Tirunelveli a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-23-2017
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under section 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to sanction and disburse the petitioner's daughter, namely, S.Tamilarasi, educational loan amount of Rs.3,65,000/- based on the Bona fide Certificate, dated 27.09.2016, issued by the Sara Nursing College, Palani Main Road, Manakadavu, Dharapuram, Tirupur District, based on the petitioner representation dated 01.12.2016 within the period stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner seeks for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to sanction and disburse educational loan to his daughter, namely, S.Tamilarasi, based on his representation, dated 01.12.2016. 2. The case of the petitioner is as follows:- The petitioner's daughter joined B.Sc., Nursing course at Sara Nursing College, Palani Main Road, Manakadavu, Dharapuram. The total fee payable to the said course is Rs.3,65,000/- and therefore, the petitioner presented an ap...
M. Sankar Nadar and Another Vs. Deva Krishnan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.9 of 2010, dated 29.06.2010 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Uthamapalayam in reversing the judgment and decree dated 15.12.2009 passed in O.S.No.6 of 2009, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Uthamapalayam.) 1. The above Second Appeal arises against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.9 of 2010, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Uthamapalayam reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No. 6 of 2009, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Uthamapalayam. 2. The defendants are the appellants and the respondent is the plaintiff in the suit. The plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.6 of 2009 for specific performance and permanent injunction. 3. The brief case of the plaintiff is as follows: (i) According to the plaintiff, the suit property belongs to the first defendant by virtue of a registered sale deed dated 18.03.1980....
Philip Navaratinam Vs. Paul Ponniah(died) and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.56 of 2007, dated 25.04.2007, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Madurai confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.1422 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Madurai, dated 19.01.2007.) 1. The above Second Appeal arises against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.56 of 2007, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Madurai, confirming the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.1422 of 2004, on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Madurai. 2. The defendant is the appellant. The respondents 2 to 5 are the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent, who was the plaintiff in the suit. The plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.1422 of 2004 for permanent injunction. 3. The brief case of the plaintiff is as follows: (i) According to the plaintiff, originally the suit property was owned by one Pappamal ...
Jayakumar Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thanjavur Sou ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed in Crl.A.No.33 of 2007 on the file of the 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Act Cases), Thanjavur in C.C.No.803 of 2004 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Thanjavur and acquit the revision petitioner.) 1. This criminal revision case is filed against the judgment dated 16.02.2008, in Criminal Appeal No.33 of 2007 passed by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Act Cases), Thanjavur, whereby the lower appellate Judge modified the judgment, dated 03.02.2007 in C.C.No.803 of 2004 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thanjavur. 2. The case of the prosecution is as follows:- PW-1 is the Headmaster of Allyya School and it was run by the trustees. In the Pari Educational Trust, A1 who was one of the Trustees, was the Chairperson. While so A1 had made certain corrections in the original Trust deed with regard ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »