Chennai Madurai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Muthusamy Vs. the Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporat ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pay the petitioner Rs.5,16,508/- towards Gratuity and Rs.1,33,798/- towards Leave Salary and also arrears of wages for the period from 01.09.13 to 30.11.13 payable pursuant new wage settlement together with 18% interest per annum and further directing the respondents to pay him Rs.2,37,469/- towards the pension Commutation amount and arrears of pension for the period from 01.12.13 by revising his pension together with 18% interest per annum, after calculating all terminal/pension benefits based on the monthly wages payable to the petitioner on the month of retirement i.e., November, 2014 by revising the same as per the settlement dated 13.04.15 as ordered by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in its order, dated 29.01.2016 in W.A.(MD) No.1457/15 and etc. batch.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation...
M. Abdul Rahman Shet and Others Vs. The Managing Director, Tamilnadu S ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay provident fund, Gratuity and Leave Salary with 18% interest per annum to the petitioner within a stipulated period.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondent Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondent would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment, dated 12.06.2015, passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, is extracted hereunder: "The learned Additional Advocate Genera...
M. Periyakaruppan Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transpor ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's monetary benefits which are due to him after retirement within the time as stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment, dated 12.06.2015, passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, is extracted hereunder: "The learned Additional Advo...
Jeyaseelan Vs. The Inspector General of Registration, Chennai and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.C.Pa.No.15/2011, dated 26.04.2013 received on 09.05.13 with regard to document No.1590 of 2010 of the petitioner and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the appeal sent by way of registered post on 21.12.2011, on merits in accordance with law.) 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the Learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondents. 2. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. According to the Petitioner, he had presented a sale deed, dated 20.09.2010, before the Third Respondent/Sub Registrar, Nazareth, Tiruchendur Taluk, Tuticorin District, to register the same after receiving necessary charges payable by him. As a matter of fact, the Third Respondent had directed him to pay a sum of Rs.70,668/- a...
G. Kutha Baksh Vs. The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Tallakulam, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS restraining the respondents not to seize attach the movable properties of the petitioner on the basis of the impugned provisional demand notices dated 13.07.2016 in assessment No.389953 and 389954 pending enquiry under Rule 28 Sch.II of the Madurai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1921.) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed....
R. Kanagamani Vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to settle the Petitioners retirement benefits Provident Fund Gratuity Commutation of Pension Leave Wages for 240 days Medical Leave Wages for 9.5 days, Surrender Leave Wages, and Dearness Allowance, payable to him along with monthly pension with reasonable rate of interest.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment...
V. Bakthavachalam Vs. The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Tri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pay the petitioner Rs.7,00,868/- towards Gratuity, Rs.6,10,531/ towards Leave Salary and Rs.1,38,582/- towards encashment of Leave On Personal Affairs together with 18% interest per annum along with interest amount towards the delay in paying EPF Employees Contribution amount Rs.2,94,198/- for the period from 31.10.15 to 22.06.16 at the rate as per EPF Scheme and further directing the respondents to pay him Rs.2,87,996/- towards the Pension Commutation, together with 18% interest per annum, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Di...
O. Jeevan Prakash Vs. The District Registrar (Document Registration), ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondent to register the Petitioner's document, dated 14.07.2016 kept as a pending in document No.P201600016 and release the same in compliance with the Registration Act, 1908.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. The main grievance of the Petitioner is that he had applied with all requisite legal formalities like purchasing of stamp papers and payment of stamp duty etc. As a matter of fact, he had requested the Second Respondent / Sub Registrar (Document Registration) Peravurani, Thanjavur District, to register the Sale Deed and release the same. However, the Second Respondent, without any authority, is not registering the document, after accepting the registration fees. (paid through Challan, dated 14.07.2016) and keeping the...
S. James Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation rep. by its Ma ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to settle the petitioner's retirement benefits including Provident Fund, Gratuity, Leave Wages, Arrears Amount and Dearness Allowance payable to him along with monthly Pension with reasonable rate of interest within the time that may be stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment, dated 12.0...
J. Kumar Vs. The Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., (Kumbakon ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to pay all the terminal benefits payable to the petitioner including Salary arrears in terms of settlement from 01.09.2013 to 31.08.2014 Gratuity and Leave Salary in terms of settlement under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act dated 13.04.2015 together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of his retirement to till the date of payment within the time that may be stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »