Chennai Madurai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Lakshmanan Vs. The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Depar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 2 and 4 i.e. the Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department Chennai, the Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Revenue Department, Chennai and the District Collector Ramanathapuram to send revised pension proposals to the Accountant General, Chennai to re-fix the pension of the petitioner counting half of the services put in by him as Thalayari for specified time frame that may be fixed by this court.) 1. This writ petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents Nos.1 2 and 4 i.e. the Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department Chennai, the Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Revenue Department, Chennai and the District Collector Ramanathapuram to send revised pension proposals of the petitioner to the Accountant General, Chennai, to re-fix his pension by counting half of the servi...
Bruhanedeen Vs. The Regional Passport officer, Trichirappalli and Anot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue a new passport on the basis of the application presented by the Petitioner on 18.4.2016 in the shape of a renewal of an existing passport.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, his passport expires on 12.1.2025 and although he was not involved in any of the offence in respect of Crime No.30 of 2013 registered on the file of the District Crime Branch, Pudukkottai, he was purportedly roped into the offence by the Respondent/Police. As such, he moved a bail application in Cr.M.P.No.901 of 2015 on the file of the Principal and District Sessions Court, Pudukkottai on 6.6.2015. He was granted bail and the charge-sheet was already filed. He also filed Crl. O.P(MD)No.14070 of ...
P.R. Thirunavukarasu Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Trans ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the retirement benefits to the petitioner in view of the representation dated 05.08.2016.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment, dated 12.06.2015, passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, is extracted hereunder: "The learned Additional Advocate General submits that he has ...
Royal Club, represented by its Secretary R.Selvaraj, Virudhunagar Dist ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned circular issued by the 2nd Respondent in Na.ka.No.417/2016/B, dated 21.07.2016 and quash the same.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. Counter of Second Respondent is filed. 3. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. According to the Petitioner/Club, it is a registered Society bearing Sl.No.47/2002 and it is a basically a Recreation Club. As a matter of fact, the Club purchased liquor cases from TASMAC godown after remitting appropriate charges. There is no sale taking place as such in the club. In reality, the members join together and consume liquor and the expenditure involved is shared. Furthermore, the Club pays a privilege fee of Rs.6,00,000/-. Further, the Petitioner/Club is running a bar for the past ten years. 5. The stand of the Petitioner/Club is that FL2 License was issued ...
C.M. Veeraiah Vs. The Executive Officer, Puduvayal Town Panchayat, Kar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.86/2015/A2, dated 18.9.2015 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to grant licence to the Petitioner in respect of first and second items of tender notifications in Na.Ka..No.86/2014/A2, dated 26.2.2015.) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed-set of papers of the Writ Petition to the effect that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs....
P. Kanagavel Vs. The Director, Directorate of Town and Country Plannin ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to re-classify the land of the Petitioner measuring an extent of 3,153 sq.ft in T.S.No.55/1, Survey No.55/30 in Periathambi Nagar, Ward No.1, Kumbakonam Town, Kumbakonam for commercial use into one of residential use.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner she is the absolute owner of the property measuring an extent of 3153 sq.ft in T.S.No.55/1, Survey No.55/30 in Periathambi Nagar, Ward No.1, Kumbakonam Town, Kumbakonam. having purchased the same for valuable consideration from one S.V.Rangasamy. He had purchased the aforesaid property by means of sale deed, dated 4.9.2008 under Document No.4050 of 2008 in the Office of the District Registrar, Kumbakonam. 5. The said property w...
A. Karuppiah Vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay all the terminal benefits amount payable to the petitioner including Gratuity, Commuted Value of Pension, Unavailed Leave Salary, Service-Surrender Leave Salary, 12(3) settlement arrears and Dearness Allowance arrears together with 18% interest from the date of my retirement to till the date of payment and also 18% interest for the belated payment of provident Fund, refund amount of Institute of Road Transport, Social Security Scheme amount and all other attendant benefits to the petitioner.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to...
Bensam and Others Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kanyakumari Dist ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the Petitioner's JCB bearing Registration No.TN72 AD-1839 seized by the second respondent on 7.8.2016, now under the custody of the first respondent.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, he is the owner of JCB bearing Registration No.TN72 AD-1839 and the Registration of the vehicle stand in his name. It comes to be known that on 7/8/2016 at about 9.10. a.m, while the Petitioner's driver was loading minor mineral(excavated soil from the well) on a mini lorry for agricultural purpose, the Second Respondent/The Inspector of Police, Thiruvattar Police Station, Kanyakumari District had intercepted and seized his vehicle without any valid reason, saying that his driver had loa...
U. Megala Vs. The Principal Secretary to Government, School Education ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to issue duplicate Transfer Certificate to the Petitioner's daughter namely U.vishali on the basis of the Petitioner's representation, dated 1.7.2016.) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed-set of papers of the Writ Petition to the effect that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
M. Devaki Vs. The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call for the records pertaining the impugned order of the 1st Respondent in Na.Ka. NO. V5/5187/2012 dated 21.02.2014 and quash the same and consequently, direct the 1st Respondent to appoint the petitioner as Noon Meal Organiser at Pillakurichi Panchayat Primary School in Karambakudi Panchayat, Pudukkottai district and pass such further or other orders.) 1. This writ petition is listed today under the caption for withdrawal on the basis of letter of requisition given by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to the Registry. 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed....
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »