Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
I. Sankaramani Vs. V. Rajaraman I.A.S., The District Collector, Virudh ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer:Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent herein for the willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court made in W.P.(MD)No.22275 of 2015, dated 11.12.2015 under the Contempt of Courts Act.) 1. It is brought to the Notice of this Court that laid gravel road was removed, as per the Letter in Na.Ka.A2/15/16, dated 28.07.2016, issued by the Block Development Officer, Rajapalayam, addressed to the Respondent / Contemnor / the District Collector, Virudhunagar District. 2. Also that the Respondent / Contemnor / the District Collector incharge had also furnished a report, dated 26.07.2016 interalia stating that the laid gravel road on Petitioner's patta land in Survey Nos.508/1 and 528/3 was removed and the same is recorded. 3. As such, nothing survives for further adjudication in the subject matter in issue and accordingly, the Contempt Petition is closed. 4. In view of the fact that the Contempt Petition is closed by this...
Thilagam Gowthaman, Represented by Her Power of Attorney, M. Seenivasa ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of declaration declaring that the cancellation deed registered by the first respondent in document No.4682/2012, dated 12.4.2012 as illegal, void and against the provisions of the Registration Act.) 1. The learned counsel on record for the petitioner has circulated a letter, dated 22.7.2016, to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. The said letter is placed on record. 2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs....
P. Muthukumaran Vs. The Director, Department of Employment and Trainin ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the fourth respondent from preventing the Petitioner to write the examinations in any manner in the Government Industrial Training Institution, K.Pudur, Madurai- 625 007 by citing the pendency of the Criminal Case in Crime No.1906 of 2016 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai City.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, after completion of 12th standard, he had joined ITI Fitter Course in Government Industrial Training Institute(ITI) at K.Pudur, Madurai. He is now studying in second year Fitter Course and now, it is final semester(IVth Semester) of his studies. He is not having any arrears subjects to his credit for the past three semesters. 4. The stand of the Petitioner is that on 28.6.2016 at K.Pudur Road, som...
D. Gandhimathi Vs. The District Registrar, District Registration Offic ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to conduct an enquiry based on the petitioner's representation, dated 29.04.2016 to act upon the Circular No.67, dated 03.11.2011 issued by Inspector General of Registration, in accordance with law within the time to be stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, she is the owner of the property in R.S.No.161/9, measuring an extent of 59 cents in R.S.No.160/9, in an extent of 26 cents and Re.S.No.160/4, measuring an extent of 33 cents in Sithalangudi Village, T.Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District. As a matter of fact, the said properties were purchased by her in the year 1990, by means of registered Sale Deeds, bearing Nos.1745 of 1990 and 1336 of 1996. Based on the said reg...
Kaliammal Vs. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondent to include the name of legal heirs in patta No.1930 in respect of property at Virudhunagar District, Sivakasi Taluk, Eenjar Village, Ayan Punjai in Survey No.1166/2A to a total extent of 2.52.50 hectares, by considering Petitioner's representation, dated 17.06.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, her father Veerapa S/o.Veeru possessed the property at Eenjar Village, Sivakasi Taluk, Virudhunagar District in Survey No.1166/2A, measuring an extent of 2.52.5 Hectares. Her father was in absolute possession and enjoyment of the subject property. As a matter of fact, her father expired on 10.11.1962 and her mother V.Krishnammal also expired in the year 1960. She along with one Eswarathevar, E...
A. Lakshmi Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer Madurai District and Oth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondent to dispose of the Petitioner's representation, dated 09.10.2015 within the stipulated period.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, her father Ayyavu died and left behind him the properties comprising in Survey Nos.61/1B, 61/2A2A, 61/2A2C, 61/3, situated at Parapathi Village, Thirupparankundram Taluk, Madurai District. Her father died intestate on 08.04.2002 and in fact, the Second Respondent / Tahsildar, Thirupparankundram Taluk, Madurai District, had issued a Legal heir Certificate on 18.02.2009. In fact, she is entitled to get her share from her father's property. 5. The stand of the Petitioner is that her co-brothers fabricated forged documents and executed General Power of Attorney, in f...
J. Selvakumar Vs. The Director, Higher Education, Chennai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarifed Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order passed by the third respondent dated 7.9.2015(for issuance of Transfer Certificate) and to quash the same and consequently to direct the third respondent to permit the Petitioner to continue his studies in B.E.(Mechanical) Second year.) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed-set of papers of the Writ Petition to the effect that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs....
M. Murugesan and Another U. Gandhiraj
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the order dated 13.05.2016 made in Crl.M.P.No.2520/2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi.) 1. The respondent herein, in order to exercise the powers of inspection under Section 82 of the Co-operative Societies Act, wanted the petitioners herein to produce documents (24) within a period of seven days, as per the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.2520/2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi dated 13.05.2016. This order is under challenge in this revision petition. 2. The petitioners are described as revision petitioners and the respondent is described as Inspecting Authority. 3. This revision petition has been filed by the Secretary and President of Q1238 Vilathur Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, respectively, seeking to set aside the order dated 13.05.2016 made in Crl.M.P.No.2520/2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi. 4. Before the Judi...
V.B.R. Menon Vs. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Chennai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent in the impugned Final Assessment Order No.AEE/OandM/Porur/F.APTS/D.No.105/15-16, dated 02.06.2015 and to quash the same and consequently, to direct the respondents to refund the Compounding Fee of Rs.4,000/- and the Penalty of Rs.52,239/- with interest @ 18% from the date of receipt of the same to the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Final Assessment Order No.AEE/OandM/Porur/F.APTS/D.No.105/15-16, dated 02.06.2015 passed by the 1st respondent, under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and to quash the same and consequently, to direct the respondents to refund the Compounding Fee of Rs.4,000/- and the Penalty of Rs.52,239/- wi...
G. Vasudevan Vs. The Chief Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu State ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-26-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to dispose the petitioner's appeal in SA 12727/B/2015 dated 18.03.2016 filed under Right to Information Act.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. 4. According to the petitioner, his appeal/complaint filed under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 is pending on the file of the first respondent/Chief Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu State Information Commission, Chennai till date and hence, he has preferred the present writ petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in directing the first respondent/ Chief Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu State Information Commission, Chennai to dispose of his appeal/complaint in S.A.No.12727/B/2015, dated 18.03.2016, within a time to be determined by this Court. 5. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »