Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Kumarasamy Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Srivilliputhur, Virudhun ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned communication dated 27.06.2016 bearing No.TIN 33416081572/2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014 and 2013-2014 and quash the same.) 1. Since the issue involved in all the Writ Petitions are one and the same, these matters are taken up together and disposed of, by this common order. 2. The petitioner herein is the assessee on the file of the respondent. He challenges the impugned order, dated 27.06.2016, issued by the respondent, on the ground that there is violation of the principles of natural justice, since the respondent failed to provide the details sought for by the petitioner, in the explanation dated 30.12.2015. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, before initiation of the proceedings, a duty is cast upon the respondent to provide the necessary documents to defend the case of the petitioner i...
P. Sivakumar Vs. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Theni
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to conduct survey and measurement of the petitioner's house site measuring 353.1/8 sq.t., comprised in S.No.36/2A situated in Veerapandi Village, Palanichettipatti, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni district, as per the registered sale deed dated 05.10.1978 vide Doc.No.2652/1978 on the file of Sub Registrar, Theni, within a reasonable time.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondent. 4. According to the Petitioner, he had applied before the Respondent / Tahsildar, Theni, for conduct of survey and measuring the property, bearing Survey No.36/2A, situated in Veerapandi Village, Palanichettipatti, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni district, on 01.06.2016 and paid necessary charges into the Treasury in this regard. In fact, the Petitioner had approac...
Sermadurai Vs. The Thasildar, Alangulam Taluk, Tirunelveli District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue a patta in favour of petitioners based on their representations dated 24.06.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondent. 4. According to the petitioners, their representations dated 24.06.2016 were addressed to the respondent/Thasildar, Alangulam Taluk, seeking for issuance of patta in respect of Survey No.684/2, measuring an extent of 0.68.0 Hectares, Survey No.683/2A, measuring an extent of 0.32.0 Hectares and Survey No.683/2C, measuring an extent of 0.01.0 Hectares of Iythamkattalai Village, Alangulam Taluk, Tirunelveli. 5. It is to be noted that the petitioners' father Vadivel Nadur had executed three separate gift deeds in favour of the petitioners on 20.04.2010 and from the date of the said gift deeds they are enjoying the proper...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
T. Raja, J 1. M/s.Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, represented through its Deputy General manager (CM), Tallukulam, Madurai, has challenged the impugned order of the respondent dated 20.06.2016, in and by which, the respondent has demanded property tax from the petitioner for the year 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after the formation of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, the entire department was controlled by the Ministry of Telecom, under the Government of India. Further, all the properties of the petitioner's undertaking stands only in the name of the Government of India, Ministry of Telecom, even though BSNL was formed as a separate entity, still, it is under the control of Government of India, Ministry of Telecom. Further, the property in question was originally stood in the name of the Central Government and after due procedure, the said property was transferred in the name of the petitioner Company. Therefore, it has to be construed that a...
L. Franklin Castrol Vs. G. Muthukumaraswamy
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 20.09.2013 passed in MCOP No. 84/2007 on the file of the Principal Motor Claims Tribunal(Principal Subordinate Judge), Nagercoil and allow the CMA.) 1. Aggrieved over the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal Subordinate Court, Nagercoil, in M.C.O.P.No.84 of 2007, dated 20.09.2013. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the records. 3. The respondent filed a claim petition against the appellant, alleging that on 23.11.2006, when he was proceeding in his TVS Scooty in Nagercoil, the appellant's car bearing bearing Registration No.TN 74-7905 came in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against the respondent. In that process, he sustained grievous injuries and he was immediately admitted in a hospital for medical treatment. He filed the petition cla...
V. Ravikumar Vs. S. Ganesh, District Collector, Pudukkottai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer:Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying this Court to punish the Contemnors/Respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.7766 of 2015, dated 4.6.2015.) 1. Earlier, this Court, on 4.6.2015 in W.P(MD)No.7766 of 2015 filed by the Petitioner, had disposed of the Writ Petition, by directing the Respondents to do the survey in the presence of the Petitioner as well as the other parties. 2. At this stage of hearing of the matter,it is brought to the notice of this Court on behalf of the Fifth Respondent/The Executive Officer, Town Panchayat, Ponnamaravathy and Taluk, Pudukkottai District that the Fifth Respondent had obtained an order of interim stay in W.P(MD)No.14865 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015,dated 18.08.2015 and the same is in force as on today. As such, it appears that the order, dated 4.6.2015 passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.7766 of 2015 is not to be complied with by the concerned official ...
Pandiyarajan Vs. The Secretary to Government, Tourism, Culture and End ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: IN W.P(MD)No. 5364 of 2016: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first Respondent vide G.O(Pa) No.41, Tourism, Cultural and Endowment(HR3-1) Department, dated 2.3.2016 and to quash the same.) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted before this Court that the relief sought for in these Writ Petitions have become infructuous and also made endorsements to that effect. 2. In view of the same, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. No costs....
Manimegalai Vs. The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Exc ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned detention order passed by 2nd respondent made in his proceedings in Cr.M.P.No.02/2016, dated 29.02.2016, in detaining the detenue under Section 2(f) of Tamilnadu Act 14 of 1982 as a Goonda and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the Detenue namely Selvakumar S/o.Ramasamy, Male, aged about 39 years, who is detained in Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli, before this Court and set him at liberty.) K.K. Sasidharan, J. 1. This Habeas Corpus Petition is filed by the wife of the detenu - Selvakumar, who is under detention, pursuant to the order passed by the second respondent, dated 29 February, 2016, in Cr.M.P.No.02/2016, under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug-offenders, Forest-offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sex...
Kumar Vs. The Branch Manager, Indian Bank and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to sanction the educational loan of Rs.4,00,000/- applied for the Petitioner's daughter namely Sindhuja, B.E. Electronic Communication Engineering Course for the period of 2015-2019 in Hindusthan College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, his daughter Sindhuja had completed her Higher Secondary Education during the month of March 2015 and she secured 880/1200 marks through SMB Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Dindigul. After completing her Higher Secondary Course in the year 2015, she aspired to joint the course in B.E. Electronic Communication Engineering and hence she joined the Hindusthan College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore. 4. The stand of the Petitioner is that he...
A.R. Karuppaiah Vs. The District Collector, Pudukkottai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondent to inspect the property in S.No.260/1A in Kottai Street, Illuppur Village, Pudukkottai District and issue patta by considering the Petitioner's representation, dated 15.07.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. Admittedly, the Petitioner's representation, dated 15.07.2016, is pending before the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. In fact, in the said representation, the Petitioner has sought for issuance of patta, in respect of the property bearing S.No.260/1A in Kottai Street, Illuppur Village, Pudukkottai District. As on date, the Petitioner's representation, dated 15.07.2016, is pending without any disposal. 5. Considering the fact that the Petitioner's representation, dated 15.07.2016, is pending before the Respondent Nos.1 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »