Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C. Senthilkumar and Another Vs. State represented by The Inspector of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure praying to set aside the orders made in S.C.No.118 of 2014 dated 12.07.2016 on the file of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai.) 1. On the complaint of the Assistant Engineer, P.W.D., a case was registered in Crime No.761 of 2013 under Sections 147, 148, 427 and 109 IPC, Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act and Section 30 (1) (i) (iv) of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 r/w Section 149 IPC. After investigation, a charge sheet was filed and it has been taken up for trial in SC No.118 of 2014 on the file of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. 2. Petition in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.7596 of 2014 has been filed to quash the proceedings and it is pending. Pending the original petition, this Court has dispensed with the personal appearance of the accused 2 and 3 / petitioners herein by the order dated 23.03.2014 in M.P.(MD) No.2 of 2014. 3. The petitioners filed a mem...
G. Mary Jennie Vs. The District Collector, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari Dist ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents herein to make necessary changes in the revenue records and assign the lands in Survey No.607/3, 606/1 in Kollamcode Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District, within the time frame stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the petitioner, she is owning lands in Survey Nos. 606/1, 606/2, 606/3, 607/3 at Kollamcode Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District and the total extent of the land is 74 cents and the same was purchased by her by two sale deeds in the years 1964 and 1968 respectively. Survey Nos.606/1 and 607/3 were classified as assessed waste dry lands. Subsequently, she is residing in the survey lands by constructing a house and by planting several trees such as coconut, jack fruit and by digging a well for the purpose of irr...
R. Nadiya Vs. The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chennai and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the order passed by the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.B2/1166/2007, dated 23.02.2010 and consequently the order passed in Na.Ka.No.B2/3146/2010, dated 26.03.2010 and quash the same and directing the 2nd respondent to appoint the petitioner for the post of Village Assistant in Kallarathinipatti Village.) 1. The above writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the order passed by the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.B2/1166/2007, dated 23.02.2010 and the consequential order passed in Na.Ka.No.B2/3146/2010, dated 26.03.2010 and quash the same and to direct the second respondent to appoint the petitioner in the post of Village Assistant in Kallarathinipatti Village. 2. The petitioner's case is that on 06.01.2010, a paper publication was made calling for applications from eligible candida...
P. Jeyachandran Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to survey the Petitioner's land and to place the survey stones comprised in S.No.24/2A, measuring an extent of 0.55.5 hectare(77 cents) middle portion, out of 1 acre and 37 cents situated at Manickampatti Village, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai North, Alanganallur Sub-Division, Madurai District based on the Petitioner's representation dated 29.6.2016 within the time frame fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, his representation, dated 29.06.2016 addressed to the Second Respondent/The Tahsildar, Vadipatti, Madurai District is pending as on date, without any progress or disposal. In fact, the Petitioner wants a survey to be conducted in respect of the property com...
P. Sivaraman and Another Vs. The District Collector, Pudukkottai Distr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to implement the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai in Na.Ka.4242/2015/A4, dated 27.11.2015 by entering the names of the Petitioners in the revenue records relating to S.Nos.1211/1A1, 1211/2A, 1212/1 and 1212/2A measuring 4.35.5 Hecs equivalent to 10.75 acres situated at Thulayanur Village, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkoittai District, covered by Sale Deed, dated 1.8.2014 vide Doc.No.2155/2014 and granting transfer of patta to the petitioner within a reasonable time, as may be fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioners, they had purchased the properties in Thulayanur Village, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkoittai District, for a valid sale consideration of Rs.13,0...
A. Nazeer Ahmed Vs. State Express Transport Corporation (Tamil Nadu) L ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay all the terminal benefits payable to the petitioner including Salary arrears in terms of settlement from 01.09.2013 to 30.04.2014, Provident Fund, Social Security Scheme amount, Refund of Institute of Road Transport contribution amount, earned Leave Salary, in terms of the Settlement 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act dated 13.04.2015 together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from date of his retirement to till the date of payment.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondent Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submi...
K. Meena Vs. Kalaimani
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed against the fair and decreetal order, dated 23.12.2004 made in C.M.A.No.11 of 2004 on the file of the District Judge, Karur, confirming the fair and decreetal order, dated 16.04.2004, made in I.A.No.67/2004 in O.S.No.448 of 1997, on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Karur and allow this civil revision petition.) 1. Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order, dated 23.12.2004 made in C.M.A.No.11 of 2004 on the file of the learned District Judge, Karur, confirming the order, dated 16.04.2004, made in I.A.No.67/2004 in O.S.No.448 of 1997, on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Karur. 2. The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.448 of 1997 on the file of District Court, Karur, for specific performance. The case of the respondent/plaintiff is that the suit property belongs to the petitioner/defendant, who entered into an agreement for sale on 12.02.1996 with the plaintiff/respondent, for a sale consideration o...
M. Raj and Another Vs. The Inspector General of Registration and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order in No.A.The, Mu.No.4 of 2015, dated 15.09.2015 passed by the Third Respondent and impugned order in No.5002/B1/2015, dated 14.10.2015 passed by the Second Respondent and to quash the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to Register and release the sale deed kept as pending Document No.29 of 2015 executed by the Petitioners in respect of the property situated in S.No.15/1B, Vagaikulam Village, Tirunelveli Taluk and District.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the petitioners, the refusal to register and release the Sale Deed kept as pending Document No.29 of 2015, executed by them in respect of the property bearing S.No. S.No.15/1B, Vagaikul...
S. Murugan Vs. The District Collector and District Magistrate, Office ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st Respondent to grant gun licence to the petitioner under rule 3(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules forthwith. 1. Heard both sides. 2. According to the petitioner, he belongs to Hindu Scheduled Caste Community and further that he was elected as Panchayat President of Vempathur Panchayat, which is reserved for Scheduled Caste candidate. He is said to be a public spirited person and initiated action for protecting the life of the Scheduled Caste persons living in and around Vempathur Village from the social evils and different forms of untouchability. 3. The Stand of the petitioner is that some vested interest persons targeted him to end his life. But, his brother viz., Muthukrishnan was killed by the caste Hindus and that the Thirupachati Police Station officials registered an FIR in Cr.No.17 of 2010, on the basis of his c...
Kumar Vs. The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Madurai District and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to sanction the educational loan of Rs.4,00,000/- applied for the Petitioner's daughter namely Sindhuja, B.E. Electronic Communication Engineering Course for the period of 2015-2019 in Hindusthan College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, his daughter Sindhuja had completed her Higher Secondary Education during the month of March 2015 and she secured 880/1200 marks through SMB Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Dindigul. After completing her Higher Secondary Course in the year 2015, she aspired to joint the course in B.E. Electronic Communication Engineering and hence she joined the Hindusthan College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore. 4. The stand of the Petitioner is that he...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »