Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D. Susi Vs. The District Collector, Ramnad District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the Respondents 1 and 2 made in Na.Ka.W1/15681/2015 dated 28.05.2015 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents herein to place the petitioner as Mid Day Meal Organizer in Govt. Higher Secondary School Santhankulam in Ramanathapuram Panchayat Union.) T. Raja, J. 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition to which he also circulated a letter to the Registry seeking withdrawal of this Writ Petition, apart from making an endorsement, in the bundle. 2. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Note: Issue order copy today. ...
Janab Anis Mohammed Salin Vs. The Commissioner, Tirunelveli Corporatio ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the 1st Respondent at the instance of 4th Respondent from demolishing the super structure bearing Door Nos.144/1 144/G 144/H and 144/J at V.O.C.Street Tirunelveli Town Tirunelveli without giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the petitioner who is the tenant in the said premises and further direct the 2nd Respondent not to disconnect the service connection bearing 1) 07-006-212-206. 2) 07-006-212-213. 3) 07-006-212-208 and 4) 07-006-212-214 at door Nos.144/1, 144/G, 144/H and 144/J at V.O.C.Stree, Tirunelveli Town, Tirunelveli.) 1. When the matter is taken-up for hearing, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and to approach the concerned Civil forum to get his grievance redressed. 2. Recording the said fact, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected mis...
Palpandian Vs. Patric Josuva
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 09.04.2016 passed in I.A.No.583 of 2015 in O.S.No.37 of 2013 on the file of the Sub Court, Ambasamudram.) 1. This revision is directed against the order of the Sub Judge, Ambasamudram, passed in I.A.No.583 of 2015 in O.S.No.37 of 2013. 2. The respondent filed the suit in O.S.No.37 of 2013 before the Sub Court, Ambasamudrum against the petitioner for recovery of Rs.2,42,733/-, based on the promissory notes dated 27.06.2011. The suit is being contested by the petitioner/defendant by filing written statement. After commencement of trial and after marking of promissory notes as Ex.A1, the petitioner filed an application in I.A.No.583 of 2015 to eschew Ex.A.1 from the evidence by contending that it is not a promissory note in terms of section 4 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The learned Sub Judge, Ambasamudram, dismissed the application observing that Ex....
K. Sornammal Vs. The District Collector, Collectorate Campus, Theni Di ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned Judge, Sub Court, Periyakulam to dispose of the execution petition in E.P.No.17 of 2012 in L.A.C.M.A.No.1 of 2009 on the file of the Sub Court, Periyakulam, within a time stipulated by this Court.) 1. This revision is filed seeking for a direction to the learned Sub Judge, Periyakulam, to dispose of the execution petition in E.P.No.17 of 2012 in L.A.C.M.A.No.1 of 2009 with in the stipulated time. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents acquired land of the petitioner in the year 1997 by issuing 4(1) Notification. The award of the Acquisition Officer has been enhanced in L.A.C.M.A.No.1 of 2009 by the Sub Court, Periyakulam on 20.01.2010. Based on the decree, the petitioner filed E.P.No.1 of 2012 for recovery of the award amount, however, for the past four years, the said E.P., is pending w...
C. Selvamani Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to expeditiously dispose of the Petitioner's appeal, dated 06.10.2015, within a reasonable time, as maybe fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, his Appeal, dated 06.10.2015, is pending before the Respondent / Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District, till date, without any disposal. It appears that summons was issued in connection with an enquiry, on 13.11.2015, till date, no enquiry was conducted inasmuch as one Gokuldoss had not produced the title deed. Thereafter, there was no summons was issued or enquiry conducted, as regards the pending Appeal. Hence, the Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition. 5. Considering the fact that the Peti...
Amaravathi Spinning Mills Vs. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to effect reduction of the existing sanctioned demand from 800KVA to 30KVA to the petitioner's industry vide their application dated 12.01.2016 and 04.03.2016 in their HT SC No.19 on payment of necessary charges.) 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition to which he also circulated a letter to the Registry seeking withdrawal of this Writ Petition, apart from making an endorsement, in the bundle. 2. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Note: Issue order copy today....
S. Kamachi Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpo ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents by considering the petitioner's Representation dated 21.07.2016 and to release his Terminal Benefits with interest 1. Gratuity 2)Earn Leave surrender amount 3. DA Arrears 4. Commutation and other pay settlement benefit amount as he retired on superannuation by 31.07.2015.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking her retirement benefits, she has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment,...
N. Arif Vs. S. Muthaiah and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai to expedite the proceedings in I.A.No.580 of 2015 in O.S.No.363 of 2011 within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.) 1. This revision is filed seeking for a direction to the learned Principal Sub Judge, Madurai, to dispose of the application in I.A.No.580 of 2015 in O.S.No.363 of 2011 with in the stipulated time. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on records. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner already filed a suit in O.S.No.120 of 1986 before the I Additional District Court, Madurai for specific performance, based on an agreement of sale dated 23.08.1983 and the said suit was decreed on 03.04.1989. The appeal filed by the defendant in the suit in A.S.No.1086 of 1989 was dismissed confirming the Judgment and decree of the trial Court. 4. The learned counsel for the petiti...
The Management, Shri Maharishi Vidya Mandir, rep.through its Correspon ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari against the respondent and his men from recovering EPF Contribution from the petitioner from thee period from 06/2014 to 3/2015 as per the order of the respondent passed in MD/MDU/42594 dated 04.07.2016 and quash the same) 1. Challenging the correctness of the impugned order passed by the respondent dated 04.07.2016 the petitioner is before this Court, instead of approaching the Provident Fund Tribunal. When there is a statutory appellate alternative forum available, time and again, this Court as well as Apex Court, has held that Writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed in limine. It is open to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy before the Provident Fund Tribunal, if he desires to do so. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed....
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the Learned Government Advocate for the respondents 1 and 2. 2. The Petitioner has preferred the main writ petition before this Court in calling for the records of the 2nd respondent/Regional Joint Director of Employment and Training, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli, pertaining to his proceedings in e.f.vz;.2516/ ifg/2016 dated 15.07.2016 and to quash the same. 3. According to the petitioner, the petitioner/Valanar Academy of Vocational Training, Kuruvikulam Post, Tirunelveli District was started with an object to uplift the poor and backward youths in the vicinity of Kuruvikulam. As a matter of fact, the Institution got recognition and affiliation under No.DGET 6/22/25/97 TC in the year 1997 itself. The Institution, at present, has seven trades with respective sanctioned seats and the details of the same are as under: Sl.No.Name of TradeNumber of UnitsIntakeActual AdmissionGovt.Manag.1.Fitter2+24216262.Mechanic Ref and AC1+12610163.Mech...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »