Chennai Madurai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Karuppaiah Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District and Ano ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-28-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd respondent to register the complaint dated 26.01.2016 preferred by the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 341 and 506(ii) IPC and to take action against the accused in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the 2nd respondent to register the complaint dated 26.01.2016 preferred by the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 341 and 506(ii) IPC and to take action against the accused in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), based on the complaint preferred by the petitioner against the proposed accused, enquiry has been conducted and it has been subsequently closed. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed. The 2nd respondent is directed to furnish...
J. Ramaraj Vs. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Keeranoor Po ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the charge sheet in Sessions Case No.148 of 2009 pending on the file of the Mahila Court, Dindigul, Dindigul District.) 1. Section 482 Cr. P.C., saves inherent power of the Court. Such inherent power can be exercised either to prevent the abuse of the process of the Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. Invoking such inherent power, this petition has been filed to quash the proceedings on the ground that the continuance would amount to abuse of the process of the Court. 2. A case in Crime No.124 of 2008 has been registered under Sections 307 and 379 (N.P.) of IPC by the 1st respondent against the petitioner. After completion of the investigation, the Investigating Officer has filed a charge sheet before the learned Mahila Court, Dindigul, Dindigul District, which was taken cognizance by the Sessions Judge in S.C.No.148 of 2009. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner's wife had mo...
A. Thambidurai Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Directorate of Vigila ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-28-2016
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint, dated 19.02.2016.) 1. Thambidurai, a Kovilpatti man, wants to axe his sister Ponnuthayee / 3rd respondent and also her husband Ponraj. 2. Because of their internal fight, now Thittankulam came to lime light. Petitioner alleges large scale swindling of panchayat funds by the third respondent / present President of Thittankulam Panchayat, her husband / Ex-President and certain Panchayat officials. 3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the said couples in connivance with the Panchayat officials indulged in large scale irregularities and misappropriation of funds. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that already there was an unholistie alliance between the petitioner and one Senthilkumar. Earlier, they engineered Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1369 of 2016. That was over. Now, their new adventure is the present p...
Nagoor Maideen Vs. The Director, The Board of Higher Secondary Examina ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation of Petitioner's daughter dated 03.06.2016 for re-valuation of subjects Physics, Chemistry and Biology in her Higher Secondary Examination conducted 2016 within the time period stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the petitioner, his daughter has scored 107 marks in Physics subject, in the subject of Chemistry, she scored 100 marks, in the subject of Biology, she scored 83 marks. However, since the petitioner was affected with cancer and because of her ill-health, she could not apply for revaluation on or before 21.05.2016. The main reason attributed on behalf of the petitioner is that he was unable to apply for revaluation in respect of her daughter in time due to her hospitalization and on 03.06.2016, the petitio...
K. Jothibasu Vs. The Madurai City Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its C ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records in connection with the impugned auction notification of the respondent in Mava3/038202/15 published in Daily Thanthi news paper dated 14.06.2016 in so far as the Sl.No.2 in Zone 1 and Sl.No.6 in Zone 2 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to issue fresh license by way of extension permitting the petitioner to collect parking fee from tourist vehicles parked at Ellis Nagar 70 feet road, bypass road, Fatima College to Nataraja Theatre, Thiruparamkundram road, Bharathiyar shopping complex and omni buses parked at Mattuthavani Omni Bus Stand for a further period of 16 months for the loss of period suffered by the petitioner.) 1. The petitioner was the highest bidder on the date of public auction conducted by the respondent Corporation to collect toll parking fee from tourist vehicles parked at Ellis Nagar 7...
K. Sasikumar Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer(Sub-Collector), Tirune ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the Tipper Lorry bearing Registration No.TN -72-AS-3399 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, he being the owner of Tipper Lorry bearing Registration No.TN -72-AS-3399 was seized by the Second Respondent on 30.04.2016 when it was plying through Ambasamudram-Tenkasi Main Road. 5. The stand of the Petitioner is that the vehicle was seized on the footing that the Petitioner's driver transported six units of rough stones without having any valid licence and in fact, the vehicle was handed-over to the Third Respondent. At present, the Third Respondent is in custody of the vehicle in-front of the Kadayam Police Station, Tirunelveli Dis...
S. Murugan Vs. Tamilarasi
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-28-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for records relating to order passed by learned Family Court, Madurai, in Cr.M.P.No.61 of 2015 in Cr.M.P.No.114 of 2009 in M.C.No.28 of 1991, dated 29.10.2015 and set aside the same.) 1. The husband of the respondent, aggrieved by the enhancement of monthly maintenance to Rs.10,000/- per month has directed this revision. 2. The revision petitioner and the respondent were blessed with two sons. The sons are well educated. The elder son is gainfully employed. The second son is struggling to have a good carrier in life. They are not party to the age-old fight between their parents. 3. The revision petitioner is a Central Government servant. He is employed in C.R.P.F. As between the spouses there is a long back history. Long back she was granted Rs.1,000/- as monthly maintenance in M.C.No.28 of 1991. Thereafter, she sought for enhancement of the amount from Rs.1,000/- to Rs.5,000/- by filing Cr.M.P.No....
A. Antony Pushpa Kavitha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation of the case in Crime No.2 of 2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent police to some other police officer of the same rank.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation of the case in Crime No.2 of 2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent police to some other police officer of the same rank. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that a charge sheet has already been filed in this case on 24.06.2016 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. 3. In view of the above submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed....
Selva Kumar Vs. Atheeswari
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-28-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., to call for records relating to the order, dated 12.02.2016, made in M.C.No.19 of 2014, on the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai, and set aside the same.) 1. Truth is stranger than fiction. There are many oddities in life. Sometimes they are unbelievable, but in rarity they are believable. 2. In this revision, the revision petitioner challenges grant of Rs.2,500/- as monthly maintenance to the respondent. 3. In M.C.No.19 of 2014, respondent sought for maintenance, under Section 125 Cr.P.C., before the learned Judge, Family Court, Sivagangai. 4. After hearing both sides and perusing the evidence, the learned Judge, Family Court, ordered payment of Rs.2,500/- as monthly maintenance to the respondent. 5. Certain events had taken place in their life. Respondent is born and brought up a Hindu woman. For the sake of the revision petitioner, she embraced Christianity. She become a baptized woman. The revision ...
T.K.S. Good Shepherd Public School, represented by its Correspondent, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 1 and 2 to grant forthwith the No Objection Certificate for the establishment of the Petitioner's School without insisting on Plan and Approval from the Department of Town and Country Planning, within the time frame fixed by this Court.) Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner/School, it started functioning from the year 2013 and applied before the Second Respondent for issuance of 'No Objection Certificate' on 16.06.2015 under the CBSE Guidelines for approval/affiliation. In fact, the Petitioner made a request on 16.06.2015 to the Respondents with all necessary documents and in reality, the Petitioner sent a proposal to the CBSE praying for the grant of approval/affiliation. 5. The stand...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »