Chennai Madurai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arivoli Magalir Iyakkam, Rayappanpatti, Theni District Vs. The Distric ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from closing the fair price shop run by the petitioner Iyakkam and handed over the same to the fourth respondent.) 1. The petitioner has focused the instant Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in directing the respondents 1 and 2 from closing the fair price shop run by it and hand over the same to the fourth respondent. 2. Heard both sides. 3. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. According to the petitioner, its fair price shop is registered in R.C.No.22412232000187 under Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006 and the same is renewed periodically. Further, it is learnt that the fourth respondent/Association had passed a resolution dated 25.06.2013, with the bald allegation that public are facing many troubles by the misconduct of fair price shop run by the Women Association at Rayappanp...
M. Nepoleon Vs. The Sub-Registrar, Manokaran Complex, Maddukkur and An ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 02.09.2015 made in W.P(MD)No.15887 of 2015.) Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. 1. This Writ Appeal has been preferred by the writ petitioner whose writ petition is dismissed by the learned Single Judge by his order dated 02nd September 2015. 2. The petitioner/appellant claims that he is a joint pattadar of a parcel of land. It is his further averment that the other co-owner has unjustifiably and illegally transferred the right, title and interest thereon in favour of a third party by executing a conveyance deed and also got it registered. It is, therefore, prayed in the writ petition that the act of registration of conveyance deed by the Sub-Registrar, is illegal. 3. During the course of judgment, the learned Single Judge has noticed that the writ petitioner/appellant has already instituted a civil suit in O.S.No.18 of 2014 for partition and that was pending on the file of the learned Additional Distri...
Balasubramaniyan Vs. The Inspector General of Police and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents No.1 and 2 to conduct enquiry relating to the petitioner's complaint dated 21.04.2016 and take action against the respondent No.4 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents No.1 and 2 to conduct enquiry based on the petitioner's complaint dated 21.04.2016 and take action against the respondent No.4 in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, enquiry has been conducted and it has been subsequently closed on 30.04.2016. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 3rd respondent herein is attempting to foist false cases against his son after his release on bail granted by the Court in respect of some other case. Therefore, the petitioner, by narrating...
R. Natesan Vs. R. Padmanaban
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, 1996, against the order passed in Arbitration O.P.No.3 of 2012 dated 05.06.2013 on the file of the Principal District Court, Tiruchirappalli.) 1. The appellant/petitioner has preferred this appeal challenging the order dated 05.06.2013 passed in Arbitration O.P.No.3 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Court, Tiruchirappalli. 2. The respondent purchased a vacant land measuring 1125 sq.ft from the appellant on 09.7.1992 for a sum of Rs.37,125/-. They entered into a construction agreement dated 13.3.1994 for construction of residential building in the said vacant land. The cost of construction was fixed at Rs.2,71,827/-. The schedule of payment was also mentioned in the construction agreement. As per the construction agreement, the appellant agreed to complete the entire construction on or before 20.06.1994. The respondent paid a total sum of Rs.2,10,375/- as on 06.07.1994 including cost of lan...
Everest Mariyappa Nadar Higher Secondary School, Represented by its Se ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent herein to consider and pass orders on the Petitioner's representation dated 17.3.2016 seeking to refix the staff fixation for the academic year 2015-16 towards sanction/deployment of adequate staff to the Petitioner-school as per the existing norms and student's strength within a reasonable time fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The Petitioner is a recognized private aided school covered by the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools(Regulation) Act, 1973 and Rules, 1974. As a matter of fact, the State Government gives grant-in-aid to schools, but only to the Tamil medium schools. According to the Petitioner/School, there are totally 1302 students. 4. The stand of the Petitioner/School is that the posts sanctioned to...
S. Mahalingam and Another Vs. The District Collector, Madurai District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the Petitioners' representation dated 9.3.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. It is the stand of the Petitioners that they belong to the Kurvavan community(Scheduled Caste) and their father Santhanam expired in the year 2007 and their grand-father Karuppannan expired 40 years back. Their grand-father during his life-time was in enjoyment of S.Nos.206/2A1, 206/2B, Kosakulam Pudur hamlet, Tallakulam Village, Madurai District. Morever, from the year 1928, he was enjoying the property till his demise and thereafter, the Petitioners' father was enjoying the property and subsequently, they are enjoying the property. 4. The plea taken on behalf of the Petitioners is that for more than 88 years, they are enjoy...
S. Palanichamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superin ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 not to conduct Kangaru Court into the civil dispute between the petitioner and one Mrs.Vijayalakshmi W/o.Balakrishnan.) 1. It is an application seeking a direction to the respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to conduct Kangaru Court, by interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and one Mrs.Vijayalakshmi, W/o.Balakrishnan. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3. The petitioner is stated to be a tenant of whom the defacto complainant is the landlord. The landlord gave a complaint to the respondent, the exact details of which, is not available on record. The petitioner herein/tenant appeared before the respondent and has given an undertaking that he would vacate the premises within a period of two months. Thereafter, the counsel for the tenant issued a notice stating that the tenant has spent ...
J. Jeyaraj Vs. The District Registrar, (Administration) Office of the ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings in R.C.No.484/B1/2013 dated 02/2013, signed on 13.03.2013 on the file of the first respondent herein and to quash the same and direct the respondents to release the rectification deed dated 17.11.2011 executed in his favour, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.) The petitioner has preferred the present Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings in R.C.No.484/B1/2013 dated 02/2013 (signed on 13.03.2013) on the file of the first respondent/District Registrar, (Administration), Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli and to quash the same. Further, he has sought for passing of an order by this Court in directing the Respondents to release the Rectification Deed dated 17.11.2011 executed in his favour, within a time frame to be determined by t...
A. Udayasurian Vs. The Chief Regional Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, T ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's education loan application dated 18.07.2014 and to sanction education loan for the petitioner's daughter within a stipulated time fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. According to the Petitioner, he belongs to a backward class community viz., Hindu Kaikonar Community and he is a wage based weaver. He has four female children and his third daughter viz., Vijayalakshmi has joined a 3 years Diploma course in General Nursing and Midwifery in Sri Ramachandra Naidu Nursing Training School at Paruvakudi Village, Sankarankovil Taluk and presently studying in 3rd year. 3. The grievance of the Petitioner is that he approached the second respondent/Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District for obtaining education loan for his third daughter viz., Vijayalakshmi. He applied for the...
Sivamani Vs. State, rep. by the Inspector of Police, Madurai and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-02-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai in Cr.M.P.No.210 of 2015 dated 21.01.2015 and set aside the same and further to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai to grant interim custody of the ingot to the petitioner.) 1. This revision arises out of dismissal of Criminal M.P. No.210 of 2015 filed by the defacto complainant in Crime No.1093 of 2014, previously, on the file of Oomatchikulam Police Station, Madurai now, on the file of Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai. 2. There are A1 and A2 in this case. They are concerned with a robbery case reported in Crime No.1093 of 2014 under Section 392 I.P.C. The revision petitioner/Sivamani/defacto complainant while walking on the road in Pamba Nagar, two unidentified persons came in a motor bike, the pillion-rider snatched her gold chain weighing 5 sovereigns from her neck. The bike sped away along with the criminals....
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »