Chennai Madurai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
George Qubert Raj Vs. The Superintendent of Police, At Nagercoil, Kany ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 16.04.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed for a direction to the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 16.04.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3. The sum and substance of the complaint preferred by the petitioner is that he is an eye witness to the occurrence, in which, his mother and his uncle were murdered by the accused persons, pursuant to which, a case has been registered in Crime No.595/2013. While so, the proposed accused persons are threatening the petitioner not to give any evidence against him. 4. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), petition enquiry is stated to be pending before the 2nd respondent. 5. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed ...
K.S. Krishnamurthy Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Dindigul ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.3 of 2015 dated 20.03.2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned.) 1. The petitioner/Krishnamurthy/A1 came forward under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR in Crime No.3 of 2015 registered by the first respondent/Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-corruption, Dindigul. Selection of Assistant-cum-Typist on a consolidated pay, was conducted, to the Juvenile Justice Board, Dindigul and Child Welfare Committee, Dindigul, which comes under Social Welfare Department. A list of candidates was called for from the District Employment Office. Two lists, each consisting of 10 persons were prepared. Typing test was conducted and it was monitored by A2. The petitioner/A1 was the then Superintendent of the Regional Social Defence Office, Madurai and his duty is to collect and put up the papers of all the p...
Murugan Vs. The Tahsildar, Thanjavur District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant patta for petitioner's house site situated in Natham Puramboku land situated at Door No.1-A, Eruthukkaara Street, Melamaruthuvakkudi, Aduthurai, Thiruvidaimaruthur Taluk, Thanjavur District considering the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2016 within the period stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. It is the stand of the Petitioner is that originally his father had acquired the Natham poromboke property 50 years ago and he was in exclusive possession and occupation of the said property by putting up a thatched house. In fact, all the documents such as ration card and electricity bill were issued in his father's name and the property tax was also assessed in his father's name. His father died in the year 2005 leaving behind him the petitioner a...
S. Venkatesan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to give adequate police protection for the life and limb of the petitioner and his sister.) Every 2 seconds a girl becomes a child bride. Stop the clock end child marriage - reports international.org/child-marriage. Pleading to stop the marriage of a child with a bleeding heart, the petitioner has approached this Court. Stating that neither he nor his sister Vijayalakshmi is interested in the marriage of Vijayalakshmi with her uncle's (Nagappan) son Vinoth and that his sister being a child should not be married before she attains marriageable age and therefore, the Police must be directed to provide protection to the life and limb of the petitioner as well as his sister, this petition has been filed by one Venkatesan. 2. The father of the petitioner by name Sakthivel, on the other hand, has filed a complaint alleging that her daughter Vijayalaks...
Miriyam Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police Cheranmahadev ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District to conduct a joint trial with regard to the cases in C.C.No.136 of 2010 and C.C.No.137 of 2010 pending on its file.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District to conduct joint trial with regard to the cases in C.C.No.136 of 2010 and C.C.No.137 of 2010. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who takes notice for the first respondent. 3. It is not in dispute that both cases in C.C.No.136 of 2010 and C.C.No.137 of 2010 have arisen out of one and the same incident. When the cases have been arisen out of one and the same incident, it is the duty of the trial Court to conduct joint trial. 4. It is represented that the petitioner herein has filed Crl.O....
M.S. Rajasekaran Vs. The Managing Director, Chennai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's appeal dated 04.04.2016 to refund the deposited amount of Rs.6, 25, 894/- to the petitioner.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the petitioner, he is the Proprietor of Palanikumar Transports, Pattukottai and in the year 1990, he was appointed as a Transport Contractor by the 2nd respondent/Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Thanjavur Region through open tender. Since then, the transport contract is being extended periodically. 4. During the course of business, the 2nd respondent/Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Thanjavur Region, directed the petitioner to transport 550 bags of rice from Ammanpettai Modern Rice Mill to Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Thiruvall...
Suriya Prasanth Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and his wife for their personal life and limb.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and his wife for their personal life and limb. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. 3. The petitioner has married one Arthi and the marriage has been duly registered on 07.04.2016; that the 3rd and 4th respondents, who are the father and brother of the petitioner's wife are threatening the couple with the dire consequences and the apprehension is that the petitioner and his wife may even be killed; that a complaint was laid on 12.04.2016, which was not enquired into and that made the petitioner to approach th...
N.C. Athinarayana Perumal Vs. The Joint Commissioner, Tirunelveli and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to dispose the amendment petition in O.A.No.2 of 2016 pending on the file of the 1st Respondent herein within the time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, he filed a petition in O.A.No.2 of 2016 before the first respondent/Joint Commissioner, H.R and C.E Department, Tirunelveli, wherein, he had made a request to take up the petition in O.A.No.2 of 2016 for hearing as quickly as possible and to modify the age old scheme framed in the year 1999 in O.A.No.4 of 1999, after enquiring the petitioners in O.A.No.2 of 2016. 4. It comes to be known that in O.A.No.2 of 2016, there are totally 6 petitioners (including the writ petitioner). Surprisingly, in the representation dated 18.05.2016 of the writ petitioner, addressed to the fi...
K. Rajendran Vs. State through The Superintendent of Police, Virudhuna ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner without following the due process of law.) 1. This application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to the respondents not to harass the petitioner and to follow due process of law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3. The petitioner herein is the accused in Crime No.25/2015 registered by the District Crime Branch, Virudhunagar. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that when the petitioner has regularly and continuously appearing before the respondent pursuant to the orders passed by this Court dated 04.12.2015 in an application seeking anticipatory bail, there is no justification for the respondent to call the petitioner in the name of enquiry even thereafter. It is pointed out that the petitioner was appearing before the responden...
M. Subbulakshmi Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Superin ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the second respondent to give police protection for the life of the petitioner and her family members and also to the property.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the second respondent to give police protection for the life of the petitioner and her family members and also to the property. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. 3. The case of the petitioner is that after the death of her father on 12.04.2001, she became the owner of the property along with four of her sister; that the four proposed accused persons made an attempt to trespass into the property and threatened the petitioner and her sisters to dispossess themselves from the property; that some persons belonging to lower state of society have been made use of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »