Chennai Madurai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Karuppan @ Karuppaiah Vs. The District Collector, Pudukkottai and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbearing the respondents from giving permission to any person or group to perform a temple festival for Adaikalam Kaatha Ayyanar temple, Sri Veeramakaliamman temple, Sri Ponnadaselvi Temple and sri Minnal Kodial Temple or any other program in Keelakurichi village, Iluppur Taluk, Pudukkottai District till a solution is found by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2014 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the submissions made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed....
Berin @ Berin Deniyo Vs. The State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Inspector ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel, Kanyakumari district to expedite the hearing of C.C.No.110 of 2014 in the court of Judicial Magistrate Eraniel, Kanyakumari District and to dispose the same within a reasonable time as may be fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. It is an application seeking a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel, Kanyakumari district to expedite the hearing of C.C.No.110 of 2014 within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3. A case has been registered against the petitioner under Sections 147, 148, 448, 427 and 506(ii) I.P.C and the same has been taken on file in C.C.No.110 of 2014. The case is pending for trial. 4. A perusal of Diary extract of the Court below would reveal that starting from 22.07.2014, followed by 30.12.2014, 17.06.2015, 1...
Mohammed Bashir Vs. Dr. Mahesh Menon and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records pertaining to the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District, in Cr.M.P.No.6920 of 2012 vide his order, dated 02.11.2012, and set aside the same and consequently direct the above said learned Magistrate to forward the petitioner's complaint to the Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Tirunelveli City under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., so as to register an F.I.R.) 1. As against the refusal of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, to forward his complaint, under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., the complainant has directed this revision. 2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner contended that taking the allegations as such in the complaint, as it discloses cognizable offences under Sections 120-B, 406, 420 and 506(1) I.P.C., the refusal of the learned Judicial Magistrate to forward the complaint is not in accordance with ...
Chinnasamy Vs. The District Collector, Dindigul and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to provide a drinking water tap connection to petitioner's house in S.No.831/2A, located opposite to V.A.O. Office, Naal Road, Eriyode Village, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the petitioner, he seeking drinking water tap connection for his tiled house and sent very many representations from the year 2015 onwards. However, till date no action has been taken in the subject matter in issue. It is also represented on behalf of the petitioner that for the last legal notice issued on behalf of the petitioner on 23.04.2016 addressed to the Fourth Respondent, the Fourth Respondent/Executive Officer Eriyode Town Panchayat, Eriyode, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District had issued a reply stating that due to water scarcity, new water connection ...
Linta K. Wilson Vs. Nasamony Memorial Christian College, Kanyakumari
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to forbear from passing any resolution for appointing or appointing anybody, other than the petitioner, in the second vacancy of Assistant Professor, otherwise called Lecturer, in Mathematics in the said section of the 1strespondent college.) 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.Criminal Revision Petition before the competent forum. No costs....
V. Sathyabama Vs. The State, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pursuant to the impugned G.O.Ms.No.854 Home (Pol. XIX) Department dated 14.12.2011 passed by the 1st Respondent in so far as the petitioner's property to an extent of 10 cents purchased and registered in Document No. 3049/2011 on the file of Sub Registrar Office, Thiruvattar which comes under S1.No.7 in Schedule of properties and quash the same.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. According to the petitioner, he purchased the property in R.S.No.596/6A, Thiruvattar Village, Kalkulam Taluk, measuring an extent of 10 cents, from one Sundarabai, W/o.Nelson residing at Mekkodu Village, Kalkuzhi Post, Madathuvilai for a valuable consideration of Rs.1,14,000/- by means of registered sale deed dated 10.10.2011 on the file of the Sub Registrar Office, Thiruvattar (vide document No.3049 of 2011). After purchasing the said land, her name was entered in the revenue records (i...
N. Ganesan and Another The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar Dist ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-20-2016
(Prayer in Crl.O.P.(MD) 8612/2016: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner to harvest the fish, which are reared in the Arasaneri Tank, Puthur Village, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District, by considering the representation of the petitioners dated 20.01.2016. Prayer in Crl.O.P.(MD) 8613/2016: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner to harvest the fish, which are reared in the Chettiyarpatti Village, Thondaiman Tank, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District, by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 20.01.2016.) Common Order 1. These petitions have been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to provide adequate police protection to harvest the fish, which are reared in Aransanery Tank, Puttu...
M. Kathirevl Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Government Cable T. ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the fourth respondent to direct the fifth respondent to telecast the local channels of the petitioner through the MSO conducted by her and also to pass further orders as this Court may deem it fit.) 1. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed....
S. Arumugam Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the letter O.Mu.No.282/2016/14 dated 04.03.2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same and to direct the 2nd respondent to issue legal heirship certificate by taking the petitioner's application dated 11.01.2016 into file.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the petitioner, he is doing agricultural work and his father Thiru.S.Shanmuga Sundaram Pillai died intestate on 20.07.1955 leaving behind the petitioner, his mother and his sister Gandhi. His sister Gandhi died in the year 1974 itself. His mother Kamachiammal expired on 02.12.2006 leaving behind the petitioner as a sole legal heir. 4. The principal stand taken on behalf of the petitioner is that he is the sole legal heir of his deceased father Shanmuga Sundaram Pillai. Because of lack of education, he has n...
SP. D. Karuppaiah Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent No.2 to register FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 23.03.2016 preferred by the petitioner in accordance with law within the stipulated time.) 1. Karuppaiah, the petitioner came forward with this petition invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C, praying for a direction to the second respondent, the Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption department, Sivagangai District, to register a criminal case as against one Nirmala and Karaikudi Municipality officials. 2. The said Karuppaiah's younger brother is one Maruthupathi. It is stated that the petitioner owns a piece of land comprised Survey No.563 situate in Karaikudi, Sivagangai Dsitrict. The said Maruthupathi passed away. Karuppaiah is stated to have as succeeded him to the said property. According to him, later, one Nirmala ownership to the said property, based on certain fake house tax receipts. 3. Karuppaiah alleges that the K...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »