Chennai Madurai Court May 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Premkumar and Others Vs. The Inspector of Police, Ramanathapuram Distr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the PCR Court, Ramanathapuram (Special Court for SC/ST (PA) Act cases), to consider the bail application of the petitioners on the same day of surrender and dispose the same on the same date on merits and in accordance with law in Crime No.15 of 2016.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the PCR Court, Ramanathapuram (Special Court for SC/ST (PA) Act cases), to consider the bail application of the petitioners on the same day of surrender and dispose the same on the same date on merits and in accordance with law, in Crime No.15 of 2016. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been implicated in this case for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, r/w Sections 3(i)(r) and 3(i)(s) of SC/ST (PA) Act, in Crime No.15 of 2016 and that in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the ...
S. Sivanu Pandi @ Satha Kutty and Another Vs. Muthu Malaiammal and Ano ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-11-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.91 of 2007 dated 16.11.2007 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Valliyoor confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.243 of 2004 dated 28.11.2006 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Nanguneri.) 1. The defendants in the original suit are the appellants in the second appeal. N.Muthu Malaiammal and U.Velammal, the respondents herein, filed the original suit O.S.No.243/2004 in the Court of District Munsif, Nanguneri, originally against the first appellant arraying him as the sole defendant. Subsequently, the second appellant Rajammal was impleaded by order dated 14.03.2006 made in I.A.No.147/2004 and ranked as defendant No.2. The suit was filed for : (i) a declaration that the respondents/plaintiffs were entitled to the plaint second schedule property which was part of the plaint first schedule property and also for recovery of possession of the ...
Arun and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Dind ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Court, (PCR) Dindigul to consider the bail application of the petitioners / accused to be filed in Crime No.105 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and to accept their surrender on the same day on merits.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Court, (PCR) Dindigul, to consider the bail application of the petitioners on the same day of surrender and dispose of the same on the same date on merits and in accordance with law in Crime No.105 of 2016. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been implicated in this case for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 3(2)(Va) of SC/ST Act in Crime No.105 of 2016 and that in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the said Act, the petitioners cannot move any anti...
M.S. Balan Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents from deceiting election candidates, agents, servers and workers from using commercial vehicles as passenger vehicles for electoral purpose.) 1. This writ petition in public interest is filed by a voter from Nilakottai to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to permit candidates, agents and workers from using Commercial Vehicles as Passenger Vehicles for election purpose in violation of the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that candidates of all parties, their agents and workers are using commercial vehicles as passenger vehicles in connection with the election work in violation of Section 192-A of the Motor Vehicles Act. Since there is a large scale violation, the petitioner submitted a representation to the respondents, through lawyer on 28.04.2016. However, the respondents have not taken any con...
Loganathan Vs. The State rep. by Inspector of Police, Trichy District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. calling for the records and set aside the order dated 21.01.2016 in Cr.M.P.No.3262/2015 in Cr.R.C.SR.332/16.11.2015 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Thiruchirappalli and condone the delay of 69 days in preferring the criminal revision petition.) 1. This petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 21.01.2016 passed in Cr.M.P.No.3262/2015 in Cr.R.C.SR.332/16.11.2015 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Thiruchirappalli and condone the delay of 69 days in preferring the criminal revision petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate [crl.side] appearing for the State. 3. The petitioner was working as Sub Inspector of Police, Traffic Investigation Wing, Trichy during 2002. A motor vehicle accident took place on 03.07.2002, in connection with which, on the complaint of one Rangasamy, a case in Cr.No.502/2002 was registered by the Motor Vehicles ...
Solomon @ Solomon Dhanaraj Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of P ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli (PCR Court) to consider the bail application of the petitioner/A4 in Crime No.118 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police on the same day of surrender on merits and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli (PCR Court) to consider the bail application of the petitioner/A4 in Crime No.118 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police on the same day of surrender on merits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 324, 307, 506(ii) r/w 3(1)(r) and (s) of SC/ST Act in Crime No.118 of 2016 and that in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the said Act, the petitioner cannot move any anticipatory bail application a...
V.C. Rajendran and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Po ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records relating to the case in Crime No.40 of 2016 on the file of the respondent/ complainant and quash the same in respect of the petitioners / accused and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the case in Crime No.40 of 2016 on the file of the respondent/ complainant and quash the same in respect of the petitioners / accused. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate [crl.side] appearing for the State. 3. On the complaint lodged by S.Meikan, the Sub Inspector of Police, Eriyodu Police Station, the Inspector of Police registered a case in Cr.No.40 of 2016 on 03.02.2016 for offences under Sections 147 and 307 IPC against the petitioners herein, challenging which the petitioners have approached this Court for quashing the FIR. 4. It is the case of the prosecution that on 03.02.2016 around 14.30hrs, the defa...
Esakkiappa Manikaraj @ Raja and Others Vs. State through The Inspector ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to transfer the case in S.C.No.393 of 2013 on the file of the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli to the III Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to transfer the case in S.C.No.393 of 2013 on the file of the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli to the III Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. 2. The petitioners are accused in S.C.No.393 of 2013 for offences under Sections 294(b), 352, 342, 506(ii) and 302 IPC r/w 34 IPC before the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. It is the case of the petitioners that Mr.Thanendran, learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli had recorded the evidence of all the prosecution witnesses in S.C.No.393 of 2013 and that when the matter was posted for defense witness, he has been transferred and posted as III Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in the same District and in his place, one Mr.Gladston Blessed Tagore ha...
Ramanujamputhur Arulmigu, Thalavai Nalla Madasamy Thirukovil Paripalan ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to direct the 2 3 and 4th respondents to provide adequate police protection to temple kodai festival called Arulmigu Sri Thalavai Nallamada Samy Temple at Ramanujamputhur Srivaikuntam Taluk Thoothukudi district to be celebrated on 19.05.2016 to 21.05.2016 based on the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 16.04.2016 with the respondents.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd, 3rd and 4th respondents to provide adequate police protection to Temple Kodai Festival called Arulmigu Sri Thalavai Nallamada Samy Temple at Ramanujamputhur, Srivaikuntam Taluk Thoothukudi District to be celebrated on 19.05.2016 to 21.05.2016 based on the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 16.04.2016 with the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the villagers ...
V.C. Murugan and Others Vs. State Rep by The Inspector of Police and A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: May-04-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records relating to the case in Cr.No.139/2016 on the file of the respondent/complainant and quash the same in respect of the petitioners/accused.) 1. This petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the case in Cr.No.139/2016 on the file of the respondent/complainant and quash the same in respect of the petitioners/accused. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate [crl.side] appearing for the State. 3. On the complaint lodged by S.Boopathy, the Sub Inspector of Police, the Inspector of Police, Eriyodu Police Station, registered a case in Cr.No.139/2016 on 02.04.2016 for offences u/s 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 353, 332 and 307 IPC r/w Section 3 of TNPPDL Act, 1957 against the petitioners and other accused, challenging which the petitioners are before this Court for quashing the same. 4. It is the case of the prosecution that on 02.04.2016, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »