Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lingapandi and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the FIR in Crime No.50 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No.50 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.50 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (PoA) Act, 2014147, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC, has been registered against the petitioners / Accused. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police, namely, Mr.D.Thirumalai Kumar, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Thiruchuli Police Station. Learned counsel appearing for the parties also endorsed the identi...
Thangaraj Vs. The District Collector, Thoothukudi and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to consider the petitioner's objection dated 08.04.2016 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Mandamus to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to consider the petitioner's objection dated 08.04.2016. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner pointed out that already civil suit is decreed in favour of the petitioner. In spite of the same, the fifth respondent has given an application to permit him to conduct the festival, which he is not entitled. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner should also be heard before taking any decision in the application filed by the fifth respondent. 4. Taking note of the submissions made, the fourth respondent is directed to give an opportunity of being heard to ...
R. Jayaraj Vs. The Assistant General Manager and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to permit the petitioner to participate in the auction to be conducted vide E tender notice (BID No.1000014211), dated 09.02.2016.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to permit him to participate in the auction to be conducted pursuant to the issuance of the tender notice dated 09.02.2016. 2. In response to the tender notification issued by the first respondent on 09.02.2016, the petitioner submitted his application for participating in the tender proceedings. As per the terms and conditions of the tender notice, the Earnest Money Deposit of Rs.1,85,100/- (Rupees one lakh and eighty five thousand and one hundred only) has to be paid to the credit of the first respondent through on-line through e-tender portal or net banking or bank transfer in the form of RTG...
M. Muthuraj Vs. The Deputy General of Police Tamil Nadu Police Departm ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
Pushpa Sathyanarayana, J. 1. Challenging the rejection of representation for compassionate appointment vide order dated 01.3.2011 passed by the office of the Director General of Police confirming the order of the Superintendent of Police, Turicorin District, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition and has also sought for direction to the respondents to provide him employment on compassionate grounds. 2. One P. Malaiappan was functioning as a Sub-Inspector of Police and while in service, he expired on 08.4.2008 due to an accident. He was survived by the petitioner and his sisters born through the second wife and two wives. It is the case of the petitioner that his father originally married one Saroja, who was none other than his mother's elder sister and since she was issueless, his father married his mother as his second wife and they all lived in one house. The further case of the petitioner is that at the time of his father's death, he was studying degree of law and...
Senraj Vs. The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
A. Selvam, J. 1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to detention order passed in Cr.M.P.No. 01/2016 (VIDEO PIRATE) dated 11.01.2016 by the detaining authority, who has been arrayed as second respondent herein against the detenu by name Prakash, Son of Senraj and quash the same. 2. The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar Video Piracy Cell Unit as sponsoring authority has submitted an affidavit to the detaining authority, wherein it is stated that the detenu has involved in the following adverse case: "Crime No. 146 of 2015 on the file of Coimbatore VPC registered under Sections 51(a)read with 63, 52(A) read with 68, 65 of Copyright Act, 1957 and under Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code". 3. Further it is stated in the affidavit that on 30.12.2015 one Moovendran as de facto complainant has given a complaint against the detenu in Virudhunagar Video Piracy Cell Unit and the same has been registered ...
A. Riyas Vs. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Arumuganeri Police Station, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District in C.C.No.224 of 2011 to consider the warrant recall petition filed by the petitioner on the same day of surrender.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District in C.C.No.224 of 2011 to consider the warrant recall petition filed by the petitioner on the same day of surrender. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. The respondent police registered a case in Crime No.12 of 2006 and after completing the investigation, filed a Charge Sheet in C.C.No.126 of 2006 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 452, 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchendur against six accused, of which, the petitioner is the 5th accused. Since the respondent was not able to...
V. Varadharajan Vs. State Represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent police to investigate the complaint given by the petitioner dated 12.11.2015 under the supervision of the 7th respondent and secure the accused for custodial interrogation and secure the money of the petitioner.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent police to investigate the complaint given by the petitioner dated 12.11.2015 under the supervision of the 7th respondent and secure the accused for custodial interrogation and secure the money of the petitioner. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on the complaint given by one Rajaram against Ramajeyam and Co., the District Crime Branch, Thanjavur has registered a case in Crime No.40 of 2015 under Sections 406 and 420 IPC and Section 5 of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments Act, 1997) and thereafter, a proposal ha...
V. Sandal Muthuraj Vs. The District Collector and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: in W.P (MD) No.13501 of 2013 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st respondent vide his proceedings in A.6/3168/2013 dated 09.07.2013, and quash the same. Prayer in W.P (MD) No.13630 of 2015 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records and quash the proceedings of the Panchayat Meeting allegedly held on 10.03.2015 by the Tashildar, Radhapuram and the order of the District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayats, Tirunelveli District vide his proceedings No.A.6/3168/2013 dated 15.07.2015 [Served on me on 25.07.2015] and the consequent Notification in the District Gazette vide No.155 and Proceedings No.VI (2) 121(a) 2015 dated 23.07.2015 [served on the petitioner on 25.07.2015], Removing the petitioner from the Post of President of Kudankulam Panchayat.) Common...
R.S. Mani Konar Vs. V. Roselin Savio, The Inspector of Police, Anti La ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: This contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent herein for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13172 of 2015 dated 14.07.2015.) 1. This contempt petition has been filed for punishing the respondent herein for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13172 of 2015 dated 14.07.2015. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he lodged a complaint dated 09.05.2015 to the respondent police and since no action was taken, he filed Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13172 of 2015 for a direction to the respondent police to register an FIR on his complaint, in which, this Court passed the following order on 14.07.2015: These Criminal Original Petitions have been filed for a direction to the concerned respondents to register the case based on the petitioner's/petitioner's complaint. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on instructions, would submit that in...
S. Petchiraja Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police (CBCID),Office o ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the Special Judge for PCR/SC and ST Act cases, Thoothukudi District to consider the bail application that will be filed by the petitioner in Crime No.2 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police on the same day of its filing.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the Special Judge for PCR/SC and ST Act cases, Thoothukudi District to consider the bail application that will be filed by the petitioner in Crime No.2 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police on the same day of its filing. 2. When this Court was not inclined to accept the prayer of the petitioner on merits, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 3. Permission is granted. This Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »