Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sudha K. Velappan Vs. The District Collector, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelvel ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned tender notice issued by the second respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No. A1/6854/2012 dated 14.02.2016 and quash the same and direct the respondents to grant licence to Shop No.21 situated in Tirunelveli Junction Bus Stand, Tirunelveli scheduled in impugned order dated 14.02.2016 in favour of the petitioner by considering his proposal petition dated 27.01.2016.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the tender notice issued by the second respondent in his proceedings dated 14.02.2016 and for a consequential direction to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to grant licence in respect of Shop No.21 situated in Tirunelveli Junciton Bus Stand, Tirunelveli in favour of the petitioner by considering his proposal petition dated 27.01.2016. 2. I heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material reco...
Malaichamy and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.20 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent dated 29.01.2016 and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed to call for the records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.20 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent dated 29.01.2016 and quash the same. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that investigation in this case in Crime No.20 of 2016 has been completed and an absconding charge sheet has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai on 27.02.2016 itself. 3. Recording the same, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioners to work out their remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
V. Ullamudaiyar Vs. The Commissioner, Department of Hindu Religious an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.04.2016 and pass orders and further direct the respondents 1 to 4 to fix separate dates of two factions for each festivals in the temples and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Mandamus to direct the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.04.2016 and pass orders and further direct the respondents 1 to 4 to fix separate dates of two factions for each festivals in the temples. 2. It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 that in respect of the very same prayer, a writ appeal has been preferred in W.A.(MD)No.807 of 2016 before the Honourable Division Bench of this Court, seeking a direction to conduct the ...
S. Dhandapani and Another Vs. State Represented by The Sub-Inspector o ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the entire records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.825 of 2013 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the entire records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.825 of 2013 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.825 of 2013 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 506(i), 406 and 420 IPC, has been registered against the petitioners / Accused. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the case in Crime No.825 of 2013 has been transferred from the file of the Sub-Inspector of Police, Oomatchikulam Police Station, Oomatchikulam, Madurai District to the file of the Inspector of Police, Koodal Pudur Police Station, Madurai District. Therefore, this Court suo motu impleads the Inspector of Police, Koodal Pudur...
M/s. Jeyam Marbles, Rep. by its Partner-L. Indirani Vs. The Appellate ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to admit the appeal filed by the petitioner dated 12.05.2015 under Section 51 of the TNVAT Act, against the order passed by the second respondent in No.33156141079/2010-2011, dated 13.03.2015 and hear and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to admit the appeal filed by the petitioner dated 12.05.2015 under Section 51 of the TNVAT Act, against the order passed by the second respondent in No.33156141079/2011-2012, dated 14.03.2015 and hear and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to admi...
S. Balakrishnan and Othres Vs. Virudhunagar Municipality, through its ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 20.12.2005 passed in A.S.No.25 of 2004 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Virudhunagar, in reversing the judgment and decree dated 23.12.2003 passed in O.S.No.279 of 2000, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar.) 1. This Second Appeal is directed as against the judgment and decree dated 20.12.2005 passed in A.S.No.25 of 2004 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Virudhunagar, in reversing the judgment and decree dated 23.12.2003 passed in O.S.No.279 of 2000, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, according to their litigative status before the trial Court. 3. It is the case of the plaintiffs that they have inherited about 3.24 acres of land in ward No.18, Survey No. 834 and 835. A lay out was formed in the year 1960, by leaving necessary space for the AA road proposed by the ...
Ahamed Anwar and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Poli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the FIR in Crime No.54 of 2016 dated 22.02.2016 on the file of the 1st respondent.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No.54 of 2016 dated 22.02.2016 on the file of the 1st respondent. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.54 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC, has been registered against the petitioners / Accused. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police, namely, Mr.G.Lakshmi Narayanan, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatti Police Station. Learned counsel appearing for the parties also endorsed the identify of their respective parties. 4. The counsel appea...
A. Maria Leon Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Kanyakumari District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent in TIN:33956166344/2014-2015, dated 29.03.2016 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to consider the reply submitted by the petitioner dated 03.02.2016.) 1. The Writ Petition has been filed to quash the impugned order in TIN:33956166344/2014-2015, dated 29.03.2016 passed by the respondent and consequently direct the respondent to consider the reply submitted by the petitioner dated 03.02.2016. 2. The impugned order is challenged mainly on the ground that a specific request has been made by the assessee seeking for personal hearing. 3. Once personal hearing is sought for before passing the assessment order which should be considered as per the judgment of this Court in SRC Projects Pvt Ltd -Vs- Commissioner of Commer...
Tvl. Ambika Saw Mills, Rep. by Madhavji Naarayan Patel, Tirunelveli Di ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to TAN:MRIS03158B dated 29.03.2016 for assessment year 2014-2015 passed by the first respondent, quash the same and direct the first respondent to consider Form 27C submitted by the petitioner.) 1. After some elaborate arguments, when this Court pointed out that since there is factual matrix involved in all these Writ Petitions, the learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submitted that the matter has to be gone into detail in an appeal. 2. In that view of the matter, all these Writ Petitions are disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate appellate authority for preferring an appal and work out their remedy, in the manner known to law. At this juncture, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the time for preferring an appeal will be over by 01.05.2016. Therefore, the time alone is ...
Karuppaiah Pillai and Others Vs. Palanisamy and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 30.03.1999 made in A.S.No.2 of 1997 on the file of the Additional District Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Pudukottai reversing the judgment and decree dated 27.02.1990 made in O.S.No.153 of 1983 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Aranthangi.) 1. This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 30.03.1999 made in A.S.No.2 of 1997 on the file of the Additional District Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Pudukottai reversing the judgment and decree dated 27.02.1990 made in O.S.No.153 of 1983 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Aranthangi. 2. The facts arising out of this second appeal, are as under: The appellants are the plaintiffs 1, 2 and 4 and the respondents are the defendants in the suit filed in O.S.No.153 of 1983 on the file the District Munsif Court, Aranthangi. The plaintiffs filed a suit in O.S.No.153 of 1983 on the file of the Di...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »