Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T. Sathish Vs. The Commissioner, O/o. The Commissioner (HR and CE), Hi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
S. Manikumar, J. 1. Appellants before us have filed separate W.P.(MD) Nos. 11088 to 11104 of 2015 to consider their written representations, dated 05.06.2015, seeking to renew the lease granted to them by the proceedings of the 2nd respondent, for a further period from 01.07.2015 to 30.06.2018 with regard to the shops situated at Beach area in Kanyakumari, belonging to the 3rd respondent temple and by imposing condition of payment of 15% increase of rent over and above rent paid by the petitioners for the month of June 2015 and by imposing any other condition. 2. Appellants are licensees of the shops in the premises of Sri Bagavathiyamman temple, Kanyakumari District from the year 2012, on a monthly rent of Rs.40/-. Admittedly, they are put in possession of the shops each measuring 40 square feet. According to them, they have been regular in payment of rent. The appellants have further contended that the license period expired in 2015. They made representations for renewal of licence f...
Sudalaikannu @ Ettaiah and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspect ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the entire records relating to the FIR in Crime No.12 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent and its consequential proceedings and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the entire records relating to the FIR in Crime No.12 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent and its consequential proceedings and quash the same. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.12 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s) and (3)(2)(5a) of Amendment Act (POA) 2015, has been registered against the petitioners / Accused. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Polic...
Ex. Lubes House, Annikarai, Thiruvananthapuram Vs. The Commercial Tax ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent herein in TIN No.33115183878/2006-07 dated 21.08.2013 and quash the same as illegal and in violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.08.2015 conduct a fresh enquiry and grant to the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper. Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent herein in TIN No.33115183878/2007-08 dated 21.08.2013 and quash the same as illegal and in violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitio...
Manohar and Others Vs. State Represented by the Inspector of Police, V ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the FIR in Crime No.55 of 2016 dated 22.02.2016 on the file of the 1st respondent.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No.55 of 2016 dated 22.02.2016 on the file of the 1st respondent. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.55 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) IPC, has been registered against the petitioners / Accused. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police, namely, Mr.G.Lakshmi Narayanan, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatti Police Station. Learned counsel appearing for the parties also endorsed the identify of their respective parties. 4. The counsel appearing on ei...
Pastor I. Sathyaseelan Vs. The District Collector, Kanyakumari and Oth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in proceedings No.D.Dis.C3/10944/15 dated 27.12.2015 and the subsequent order passed by the fourth respondent dated 02.04.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to grant plan sanction to the petitioner's Penthacost Church situated in 11/94, Kanimadam, Anjugramam Post, Kanyakumari District and to pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The impugned order is very clear subsequent to the direction of the Mohan Commission, unless they get the permission from the District Collector, they cannot hold the Church proceedings. It is an admitted case that so far the petitioner has not obtained permission from the District Collector. Therefore, the authority has given the sufficient notice and passed the impugned order. Therefore, I do no...
Antony Vs. Udayar and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.36 of 2004, dated 29.04.2005 on the file of learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.67 of 2001, dated 08.03.2004 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif, Tenkasi.) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2005, made in A.S.No.36 of 2004 on the file of learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 08.03.2004, made in O.S.No.67 of 2001, on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Tenkasi. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to in this judgment in accordance with their respective ranks in the suit. At appropriate places, the ranks of the parties in the appeal are also shown to achieve clarity. 3. The factual matrix relevant for deciding the second appeal is as below:- 3.1. The suit first item of...
M. Subbiah and Others Vs. State Represented byThe Inspector of Police ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records pertaining to FIR in Crime No.110 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent herein and quash the same. Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.410 of 2015 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same. Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the proceedings in FIR in Crime No.7 of 2015 dated 07.01.2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police. Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the proceedings in FIR in Crime No.8 of 2015 dated 07.01.2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police. Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.4 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same so far as the petitioners are concerned.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the re...
R. Rama Krishnan Vs. The District Collector, Sivagangai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to pass an order on the petitioner Appeal dated 10.03.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Mandamus to direct the first respondent to pass an order on the petitioner Appeal dated 10.03.2016. 2. The petitioner has given an appeal to the first respondent only on 10.03.2016. Admittedly, whether it is numbered or not, till date it is not known. Hence, the petitioner is at liberty to first number the appeal and if it is not taken on file, after three months, the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court thereafter. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs....
Selvam and Another Vs. The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.2071 of 2016, passed in C.C.No.103 of 2008, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandi.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.2071 of 2016, passed in C.C.No.103 of 2008, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandi. 2. The petitioners are facing trial in C.C.No.103 of 2008 before learned Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandi for offences under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(i) IPC. The prosecution examined P.Ws.1 to 9, but the accused did not choose to cross examine the witnesses on the said date after they were examined in chief. Thereafter, the petitioners filed a petition in Cr.M.P.2071 of 2016 under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to recall P.Ws.1 to 9, which was dismissed by the Trial Court on 28.03.2016. challenging which the accused are before this Court. 3. Heard Mr.Krishnasamy, learned counsel appearing for the peti...
R. Meenakshi Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Thanjavur and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2013 and to grant patta in the name of the petitioner with respect to the properties, bearing S.Nos.1579/1, 1580 and 1581 situating in Valaiyapeetai Village, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District within a time limit fixed by this Court.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Mandamus to direct the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2013 and to grant patta in the name of the petitioner with respect to the properties, bearing S.Nos.1579/1, 1580 and 1581 situating in Valaiyapeetai Village, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District. 2. Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.M.Rajarajan, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the fifth respondent. 3. By consent, the writ peti...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »