Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Anbazhagan Vs. The Central Bank of India, Through its Regional Mana ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal is to an order, made in W.P.(MD) No. 125 of 2015, dated 09.03.2015, by which, the Writ Court, while setting aside the order, dated 04.09.2014, of the Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Madurai, 1st respondent herein, has declined to interfere with the order, dated 16.03.2012 of the Assistant General Manager, Central Bank of India, Madurai, 2nd respondent herein. Consequently, the petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents to include his name in the panel of valuers. 2. Vide order, dated 16.03.2012, name of the appellant has been deleted from Bank's existing panel of valuers. Central Bank of India, Madurai, desired not to provide any valuation reports of its customers, to the appellant. Vide proceedings, dated 04.09.2014, for lack of professionalism, the appellant has been blacklisted from Bank's panel of valuers. 3. Before the Writ Court, contentions have been raised by the appellant that he was only a valuer and he is no...
C. Sevyuga Pandian Vs. The District Collector, Virudhunagar and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the fourth respondent in No. Nil Acknowledgment dated 22.01.2016 and to quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to confirm the auction in favour of the petitioner having bid the highest bid amount of Rs.1,05,000.00 held on 18.01.2016 for capturing fish in Kaniraithan Kanmai at Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District and pass further order as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in this Writ Petition is for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the fourth respondent in No.Nil Acknowledgment dated 22.01.2016 and to quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to confirm the auction in favour of the petitioner for having quoted the highest bid amount of Rs.1,05,000.00...
P. Parvadham Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to file a final report on the FIR dated 30.01.2016 in Crime No.52 of 2016, pending on the file of the 3rd respondent within a stipulated time as fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 3rd respondent to file a final report on the FIR dated 30.01.2016 in Crime No.52 of 2016, pending on the file of the 3rd respondent. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that if some more time is granted by this Court, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed by the respondent before the concerned Court. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation and to file a final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court as expeditiously as possible....
A. Thameem Ansari Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Ma ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to file the final report in Crime No.252 of 2014 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai within the time stipulated by this Honble Court.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the respondent to file the final report in Crime No.252 of 2014 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the investigation in Crime No.252 of 2014 has been completed and a final report has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, which is yet to be taken on file. 3. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
R. Sambath Chandra Vs. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Chenna ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: The Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 24.02.2016 made in W.P.(MD)Nos.12602 of 2013 on the file of this Court.) S.S. Sundar, J. 1. Aggrieved by the order of the Learned Single Judge, in dismissing the Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.12602 of 2013, filed by the writ petitioner / appellant, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to quash the impugned order passed by the Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District / the 3rd respondent therein, dated 19.07.2013 in Na.Ka.No.9503 of 2009, the writ petitioner has filed the above Writ Appeal. 2. Brief facts, which are necessary for the disposal of the above Writ Appeal, are as follows:- The appellant / writ petitioner was holding the post of President of Kanyakumari District Co-operative Bank, from 23.09.1998 to 26.05.2001. During the tenure as President of the Co-operative Bank, it appears that the appellant / writ petitioner promoted one Mr.Henry Thangam from t...
Gomathi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Karur and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to file the Final Report in Crime No.24 of 2015 dated 25.09.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent for offences U/s. 498(a) 294(b) and 506(I) of I.P.C. and proceed with the same as per law within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 2nd respondent to file the Final Report in Crime No.24 of 2015 dated 25.09.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent for offences U/s. 498(a) 294(b) and 506(I) of I.P.C. and proceed with the same as per law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the investigation in Crime No.24 of 2015 has been completed and a final report has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur the same was taken on file in C.C.No.30 of 2016 by the learned Magistrate. 3. Recording the said submission, th...
Dharmaraj @ Dharmar and Others Vs. State through The Inspector of Poli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the order passed in Cr.M.P.No. 425 of 2016 in S.C.No. 177 of 2015 dated 21.04.2016 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai.) 1. This petition has been filedto set aside the order passed in Cr.M.P.No. 425 of 2016 in S.C.No. 177 of 2015 dated 21.04.2016 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. 2. It is seen that these petitioners are facing trial for offences under Sections 448, 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC and Section 3(i) of TNPPDL Act before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. While so, the prosecution examined P.Ws.1 to 9 and P.W.13 on various dates and the accused did not cross examine the witnesses on the said dates. Thereafter, the accused filed a petition in Cr.M.P.No. 425 of 2016 in S.C.No. 177 of 2015 under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to recall the witnesses. The Trial Judge, by order dated 07.04.2016 allowed the said petition on condition that the petitioners should p...
Chellaiah and Another Vs. S. Kuttaiyan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for expeditious trial in O.S.No.146 of 2010, on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumayam.) 1. This revision is preferred for expeditious trial of O.S.No.146 of 2010, on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumayam. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners and perused the materials on record. 3. Perusal of the 'B' diary extract would reveal much delay in conducting the suit in O.S.No.146 of 2010. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners /defendants submits that the present suit is the second vexation of the same cause, by a different person and the pendency of the action caused great hardship to the Petitioners. 5. In view of the above, the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumayam is directed to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.146 of 2010 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months, from the ...
Ahamed Meeran and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Pol ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in C.C.No.339 of 2015 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.339 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam, pursuant to the amicable settlement effected between the parties. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.6 of 2015 for the alleged offences under Sections 498(A), 406, 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of D.P.Act, has been registered against the petitioners/accused. After completion of the investigation, the 1st respondent has filed a charge sheet, which was duly taken on file in C.C.No.339 of 2015 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/accused and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition...
Nachiarammal Vs. The District Collector, Tuticorin District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay a sum of Rs.55 Lakhs as compensation with interest for having demolished the petitioner's Shops seven in number total extent of 1386 Sq.ft in S.F.No.696/1B1, Serakulam Village, Ramanujamputhur Post, Srivaikundam Taluk, Tuticorin District.) S.S. Sundar, J. 1. The Writ Petition in W.P(MD)No.15959 of 2013 is filed by the petitioner one Nachiarammal, for issuing a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay a sum of Rs.55 Lakhs, as compensation, with interest for having demolished her Shops, seven in number, constructed in an extent of 1386 Sq.ft in S.F.No.696/1B1, Serakulam Village, Ramanujamputhur Post, Srivaikundam Taluk, Tuticorin District. 2. The petitioner has filed M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 to pass an order of direction, directing the respondents to pay interim compensation for having demolished the petitioner's Shops, seven i...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »