Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Chinnaiah Vs. The General Manager, National Textile Corporation Ltd ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent through his proceeding Ref: PION/Cotton-LoadMan/ 2015-12 dated 24.12.2015 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to allow the petitioner to perform the loading and unloading work till 31.03.2017 as per the proceeding of the first respondent in Cotton Loading/450/2014 dated 12.05.2014 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 24.12.2015 for cancellation of contract. 2. According to the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner is a Contractor and he was awarded with the contract, but it has been cancelled without even a prior notice. Since the respondent is a Government undertaking, the writ petition would be maintainable. 3. Even at the time of numbering the...
Jeyam Vs. Jeya Seela
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.08.2013, made in A.S.No.2 of 2011 on the file of Sub Court, Vallioor, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010, made in O.S.No.155 of 2007, on the file of learned Principal District Munsif, Nanguneri.) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the defendant in O.S.No.155 of 2007, challenging the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif, Nanguneri, as confirmed by the judgment and decree dated 20.08.2013, in A.S.No.2 of 2011 on the file of Sub Court, Vallioor. 2. The respondent, as plaintiff, filed the suit in O.S.No.155 of 2007 before the trial Court for a decree of declaration that the suit properties belonged to her, besides a decree of injunction. 3. In the plaint in O.S.No.155 of 2007, it is the case of the respondent as plaintiff that the suit properties originally belonged to one Gurusamy Nadar. He had three fema...
P. Chinthamani Vinayakam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 15.03.2016 and take necessary actin within the time stipulated by this Honble Court and pass such other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 15.03.2016 and take necessary action. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 15.03.2016, it essentially appears to be a money dispute between the petitioner and the opposite party and in order to give a criminal colour to it, the petitioner has stated that he was intimidated. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence,...
Noorul Aynaammal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respndents to register the case on the basis of the complaint dated 02.01.2016 given by the petitioner and to investigate the same in the manner known to law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respndents to register the case on the basis of the complaint dated 02.01.2016 given by the petitioner and to investigate the same in the manner known to law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.84 of 2016. 3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to cooperate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, t...
Veerakumar Vs. The District Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai Town ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint dated 6.3.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint dated 6.3.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 06.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 11.03.2016. A copy of the Closure Report has been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
K.S. Murugesan Vs. The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar District and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register an FIR on the basis of petitioner's complaint dated 06.01.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register an FIR on the basis of petitioner's complaint dated 06.01.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 06.01.2016, it essentially appears to be a money dispute. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. 4. Therefore, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
Amuthavalli Vs. The Sub-Registrar, Theni
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent not to make any registration respect to the scheduled properties mentioned in the petitioner's representation dated 22.02.2016 and pass orders within the stipulated by this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
S.R. Trust represented by its Board of Trustees, Meenakshi Mission Hos ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 11.02.2016 passed in I.A.No.378 of 2011 in O.S.No.320 of 2011 by the I Additional Sub Court, Madurai.) This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 11.02.2016 passed in I.A.No.378 of 2011 in O.S.No.320 of 2011 by the I Additional Sub Court, Madurai. 2. The petitioners are the defendants 1 to 5 in O.S.No.320 of 2011 on the file of the I-Additional Sub Court, Madurai. The respondent is the plaintiff. The respondent filed the said Suit in O.S.No. 320 of 2011 for declaration and permanent injunction. The respondent also field I.A.No.378 of 2011 for an order of temporary injunction and an ad interim injunction. The learned Judge by order dated 06.04.2011 granted ad interim injunction restraining the petitioners from preventing the respondent discharging the duties as Trustee of the first petitioner trust and Director of Academies as he performed ...
A. Dhaveethu and Others Vs. The District Collector, Sivagangai and Oth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Revision case under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the order dated 3.10.2011 made in A1-2228-11 on the file of the second respondent (Crl.R.C.(MD).No.863 of 2011) Revision case under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the order dated 8.6.2015 made in Na.Ka.A4/ 10773/2014 on the file of the first respondent (Crl.R.C.(MD).No.315 of 2015) Original petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records in Mu.Mu.5025/2014/A3 dated 31.12.2014 on the file of the Revenue Divisional Magistrate, Pattukottai and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned. (Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4819 of 2015)) V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. Many times, places of worship, to which people go, seeking solace and peace, become places where there is disruption of peace. No place of worship of any particular religion is an exception to this Rule. In 2 out of 3 cases on hand, the dispute relates to place...
K. Dhinakaran Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd Respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 11.03.2016 against the proposed accused and proceed the same as per law within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Honble Court) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 11.03.2016 against the proposed accused and proceed with the same as per law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 11.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate for...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »