Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Murugaiah Vs. State Represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Tirune ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 07.01.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 07.01.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.30 of 2016. 3. In view of the above submission, the respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to cooperate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of...
Ranjitham Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District and An ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 18.01.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 18.01.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 18.01.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 09.02.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
S. Ramanathan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 13.2.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 13.2.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 13.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 08.04.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is filed before this Court. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with direction to the respondent police to send a copy of the closure report to the petitioner within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if not already sent....
Saisiva @ Sivasubramanian Vs. The Joint Commissioner, The Hindu Religi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the impugned order in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.825/2016/A1 dated 06.02.2016 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the impugned order in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.825/2016/A1 dated 06.02.2016 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. 2. Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.Muthugeethian, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.AK.Baskara Pandian, appearing for the second respondent. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The writ petition has been filed as against the impugned order dated 06.02.2016. The petitioner though questione...
VVA. Salahuddeen Aalim Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its P ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, seeking to set aside the order dated 15.10.2014 made in W.P.(MD) No.16854 of 2014.) V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. This Appeal arises out of the dismissal of a writ petition filed by the appellant, challenging the appointment of the 4th respondent herein as Kazi for the District of Ramanathapuram. 2. We have heard Mr.M.Ajmalkhan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, Mr.M.Alaguthevan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.K.Govindarajan, learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent. 3. The appellant herein was appointed as Kazi for the entire District of Ramanathapuram. The appointment of Kazi was made by the State Government, in exercise of the power conferred by Section 2 of The Kazis Act, 1880. 4. Though Section 2 of the said Act empowers the State Government to appoint one or more Kazis for any local area, the appointment should be made after consulting the Principal ...
Vijayaraman @ Vijayadoss Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2016 and consequently directing the 2nd respondent to investigate and to file a final report within a stipulated time as fixed by this Honble Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 09.03.2016, investigate and to file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 09.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 26.03.2016. A copy of the Closure Report has been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner ...
K. Annapoorani Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 18.01.2016 and investigate the same.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 18.01.2016 and investigate the same. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaints dated 18.01.2016 and 15.02.2016 have been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 15.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action other...
A. Vairaprakasam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 12.03.2016 on the file of the respondent police.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 12.03.2016 on the file of the respondent police. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the complaint dated 12.03.2016 has been sent by post to the official respondents. 3. It is seen that the dispute essentially appears to be between the employee and the erstwhile employer for breach of service contract. Since the petitioner has sent the complaint by post, he is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 12.03.2016. On receipt of such...
K. Manicka Nadar Vs. State Represented by The Deputy Superintendent of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 1.3.2016 and investigate the matter in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 1.3.2016 and investigate the matter in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.54 of 2016. 3. It is alleged by the petitioner that the opposite parties are causing harassment and disturbance to the petitioner. 4. The respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to cooperate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made ou...
Palsamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case against the proposed accused persons based on the petitioner's complaint dated 22.3.2016) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register a case against the proposed accused persons based on the petitioner's complaint dated 22.3.2016 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.18 of 2016. 3. In view of the above submission, the respondent police is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to cooperate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law lai...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »