Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Balasubramanian @ Kannan and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the First information Report pertaining to the case in Crime No.79 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same. Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating to FIR in Crime No.183 of 2016 dated 31.03.2016 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Karaikudi North Police Station, Sivagangai District and quash the same. Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in C.C.No.39 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur and quash the same. Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in P.R.C.No.29 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur and quash the same. Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in C.C.No.540 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, S...
J. Gopalakrishnan Vs. M. Latha
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order inI.A.No.726 of 2015 in H.M.O.P.No.826 of 2014, dated 22.3.2016, on the file of the learned Family Judge, Madurai.) 1. By way of this revision, the Petitioner/husband seeks to set aside the order directing him to pay Rs.4,000/-p.m as maintenance to the respondent/wife. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and perused the materials available on record. 3. The couple, who have no issues, are living separately. While so, the Petitioner herein preferred H.M.O.P.No.826 of 2014, seeking divorce. The grounds canvassed towards setting aside the order is that the respondent/wife already is in receipt of maintenance of Rs.4,000/-p.m.. 4. It has been the contention of the respondent/wife that the same was directed to be paid towards rent. The respondent has produced proof of the Petitioner being an employee of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, receiving monthly salary ...
Karthikeyan Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Sriranga ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to file a final report in Crime No.633 of 2014 on the file of the respondent in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the respondent to file a final report in Crime No.633 of 2014 on the file of the respondent in accordance with law. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that if some more time is granted by this Court, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed by the respondent before the concerned Court. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crime No.633 of 2014 and to file a final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court as expeditiously as possible....
S. Amudha Christy Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Trichy and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to file a final report in Crime No.991 of 2015 within a time frame fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the respondents to file a final report in Crime No.991 of 2015. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that if some more time is granted by this Court, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed by the respondent before the concerned Court. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crime No.991 of 2015 and to file a final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court as expeditiously as possible....
G. Ravi Vs. The District Collector, Sivagangai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.18/2016/A2 dated 18.04.2016 served on 23.04.2016 and quash the same and pass further order as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. prayer in this Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.18/2016/A2 dated 18.04.2016 served on 23.04.2016 and quash the same. 2. Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.M.Rajarajan, takes notice for the third respondent. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The show-cause notice is sought to be challenged here. The main ground is that earlier, the petitioner came forward with the writ petition in W.P(MD)No.6801 of 2016 and this Court granted an interi...
Ajmalkhan and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in connection with Crime No.420 of 2015 on the file of the Cumbum North Police Station, Theni District and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records in connection with Crime No.420 of 2015 on the file of the Cumbum North Police Station, Theni District and quash the same. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.420 of 2015 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 355 and 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of TNPWH Act, has been registered against the petitioners / Accused. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police, namely, Mr.V.Ravichandran, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Cumbum North...
Jeyachandra Devar Vs. The District Collector, Madurai District and oth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to use the vacant place situated in front of the Thirumangalam Bus-Stand for bus passengers, general public and free flow of traffic instead of constructing shopping complex at there.) S.S. Sundar, J. 1. This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents 1 and 2, to use the vacant place situated in front of the Thirumangalam Bus-stand for bus passengers, general public and free flow of traffic, instead of constructing shopping complex at there. 2. We have already disposed of another Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.9096 of 2015 with directions. The admitted fact is that new shops 18 in numbers are proposed to be constructed in the same place wherein 10 shops were in existence. Since the building was in a dilapidated condition, Thirumangalam Municipality has passed a Resolution, to demolish the e...
S. Stalin Babu Vs. State Represented by the Inspector of Police, Thanj ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.6640 of 2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records in Cr.R.P.No. 25 of 2015 dated 14.03.2016 by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Court) Thanjavur confirming the order passed by the court of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Papanasam in C.M.P.No. 1797 of 2015 dated 09.07.2015 and to set aside the same and consequently to discharge the petitioner from the charges in C.C.No.96 of 1998 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam. Prayer in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.6641 of 2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records in in Cr.R.P.No.26 of 2015 dated 14.03.2016 by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Court) Thanjavur confirming the order passed by the court of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Papanasam in C.M.P.No. 1798 of 2015 dated 09.07.2015 and to set aside the same and consequently to dischar...
S. Jeyapaul Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Tuticori ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent police to complete the investigation in respect of Crime No.219 of 2015 dated 29.09.2015 and file a final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam, Tuticorin District.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the respondent police to complete the investigation in respect of Crime No.219 of 2015 dated 29.09.2015 and file a final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam, Tuticorin District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the investigation in Crime No.219 of 2015 has been completed and the same has been closed as mistake of fact. A copy of the closure report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. 3. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to wo...
R. Ariramachandran Vs. R. Thirumugam
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to direct the District Munsif, Tiruchendur to take on file the unnumbered E.A.NO.......of 2016 in E.P.No.38 of 2014 in O.S.No.7 of 2014 on the file of the District Munsif Court,Tiruchendur and to decide the same on merits, in accordance with law, within the time frame fixed by this Court.) 1. This revision seeks direction for early dispsoal of E.A......of 2016 in E.P.No.38 of 2014 in O.S.No.7 of 2014, which seeks reconstruction of Petition mentioned documents. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and perused the materials on record. 3. It is the contention of the Petitioner that the records relating to the case were lost in Court. If so, the Court below would be totally in error, in raising questions on the maintainability of application seeking reconstruction of records. 4. In view of the above, the District Munsif Court, Tiruchendur is directed to dispose of E.A......o...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »