Chennai Madurai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deepakraj and Others Vs. State Rep. by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Ma ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating to C.C.No.574 of 2014 on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Court, Madurai and quash the same as illegal.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.574 of 2014 on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Court, Madurai, pursuant to the amicable settlement effected between the parties. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.124 of 2013 for the alleged offences under Sections 498(A) and 406 IPC on the file of the All Women Police Station, Thirupparankundram, Madurai, has been registered against the petitioners/accused, which was subsequently transferred to the file of All Women Police Station, Madurai Town, Madurai and re-numbered as Crime No.7 of 2014 under Sections 498(A) and 406 IPC. After completion of the investigation, the 1st respondent has filed a charge sheet, which was duly taken on file in C.C.No.574 of 2014 by the learned Additional...
AL. Alagappan @ Keethivasan Vs. K. Ramasamy and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to revise the Order dated 3.2.2016 passed in I.A. No.321 of 2015 in O.S. No.90 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Judge. Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur, allow the Civil Revision Petition dismissing the Plaint as sought for with cost throughout.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to revise the Order dated 3.2.2016 passed in I.A. No.321 of 2015 in O.S. No.90 of 2015 by the Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur and allow the Civil Revision Petition and dismiss the Plaint as sought for with Cost throughout. 2. The Petitioner is the First Defendant. The First Respondent is the Plaintiff and the Second Respondent is the Second Defendant in the Suit. The First Respondent filed a Suit in O.S. No.90 of 2015 for declaration that the Settlement Deed dated 29.12.2010 executed by the Petitioner in favour of the Second Respondent as null and void and ...
M/s. S.P. Agencies, Tirunelveli Vs. The Managing Director, Chennai and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer: W.P.(MD).No.2344 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.01.2016 on the issue about the disqualification of the second respondent to participate in the tender and defer the finalisation of the contract / tender regarding the appointment of handling and transport contractor for Tirunelveli Warehouse till such time a decision is taken on the petitioner's representation dated 24.01.2016.) W.P.(MD).No.3983 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent in RC 4019/2015/G1 dated 29.01.2016 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to consider the candidature of the petitioner by treating the petitioner as L1 for award of the Handlin...
The Special Tahsildar Land Acquisition, Adi Dravidar Welfare Theni Vs. ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 13 of the Tamil nadu Acquisition Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978, against the judgment and decree dated 10.07.2007 passed in LA.C.M.A.No.10/97 by the Subordinate Judge, Periyakulam.) This civil revision petition has been filed to set aside the judgment and decree order dated 10.07.2007 passed in LA.C.M.A.No.10/97 by the Subordinate Judge, Periyakulam. 2. The petitioner is the respondent in LA.C.M.A.No.10 of 1997 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Periyakulam filed by the respondent for enhancement of compensation for his land acquired by the petitioner. 3. The learned Subordinate Judge, Periyakulam by judgment dated 10.07.2007, enhanced the compensation. Against the said judgment, the present civil revision petition is filed. 4. The facts of the case are as follows:- The land to an extent of 0.56.5 Hec., in Survey Nos.3109/1A2B in Thamaraikulam Bit Village, belonging to the respondent was acquired for the purpose of ...
J. Rabees Mariyam and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanja ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd respondent to file a final report in Crime No.339 of 2015 dated 4.12.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent under Sections 341, 294(b), 354 and 506(i) IPC.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to file a final report in Crime No.339 of 2015 dated 4.12.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent under Sections 341, 294(b), 354 and 506(i) IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. Considering the fact that the case is of the year 2015, a time bound order cannot be passed in this petition, directing the 2nd respondent police to file a final report. 4. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent police to expedite the investigation and file a final report as expeditiously as possible....
Veerachinnu and Others Vs. Sago. Nesam and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 24.09.2012 made in I.A.No.475 of 2012 in O.S.No.137 of 2012 on the file of District Munsif Court, Uthamapalayam.) 1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 24.09.2012 made in I.A.No.475 of 2012 in O.S.No.137 of 2012 on the file of District Munsif Court, Uthamapalayam. 2. The revision petitioners are defendants 5 to 8. The first respondent is the plaintiff in O.S.No.137 of 2012 . The respondents 2 to 5 are the defendants 1 to 4 in the suit. 3. The first respondent filed a suit for declaration that the suit property belongs to them and for permanent injunction. They have filed I.A.No.475 of 2012 for appointment of Advocate Commissioner and the same had been opposed by the petitioners. But, the learned Judge allowed the application. Against that, the present revision is filed. 4. The learned counsel for the petitio...
RM. Chinnaiah Ambalam Vs. The Superintendent of Poloice, Sivagangai Di ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records in connection with the final report filed by the 2nd respondent in re-open petition in Crime No.187 of 12 on the file of the 3rd respondent police, set aside the same and consequently direct the CBI or any other independent investigation agency to re-investigate the Criminal Case in Crime No.187 of 12 on the file of the 3rd respondent police.) 1. This petition has been filed to call for the records in connection with the final report filed by the 2nd respondent in re-open petition in Crime No.187 of 12 on the file of the 3rd respondent police, set aside the same and consequently direct the CBI or any other independent investigation agency to re-investigate the Criminal Case in Crime No.187 of 12 on the file of the 3rd respondent police. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that on the complaint given ...
Karthick Santhanam Vs. Srividhya Kannan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to withdraw the case in M.C.No.329 of 2014 on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Court, Madurai and transfer the same to the file of the learned Family Court Judge, Madurai.) 1. This petition has been filed to withdraw the case in M.C.No.329 of 2014 on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Court, Madurai and transfer the same to the file of the learned Family Court Judge, Madurai. 2. Heard Mrs.D.Geetha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Mr.G.R.Swaminathan, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. It is seen that Karthick Santhanam got married to Srividhya Kannan on 29.05.2013 and their marriage ran into rough weather. Karthick Santhanam is residing in United States of America for the present. Karthick Santhanam filed H.M.O.P.No.2115 of 2014 before the Family Court, Chennai for divorce. On the application made by Srividhya Kannan in Tr.C.M.P.205 of 2014, HMOP 2115 of 2014 was transferred from the Fa...
N. Pappayee Ammal and Others Vs. P. Ramasamy
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer in CRP.(MD).No.1063 of 2005: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of CPC against the fair and decreetal order made in I.A.No. 385 of 2004 in ASSR.No.770 of 2004 dated 04.03.2005 on the file of the the District Court, Karur. Prayer in CRP.(MD).No.493 of 2006: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of CPC against the ex parte docket order passed in E.A.No.123 of 2006 in E.P.No.52 of 2004 in O.S.No.804 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Karur.) 1. The Civil Revision Petition in CRP.(MD).No.1063 of 2005 is filed against the fair and decreetal order made in I.A.No. 385 of 2004 in ASSR.No.770 of 2004, dated 04.03.2005, on the file of the the District Court, Karur. 2. The Civil Revision Petition in CRP.(MD).No.493 of 2006 is filed against the ex parte docket order passed in E.A.No.123 of 2006 in E.P.No.521 of 2004 in O.S.No.804 of 2002, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Karur. 3. Both the Civil Revision Petitions are dis...
Kumarasamy Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thanjavur
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the order dated 04.02.2016 passed by the Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Thanjavur in Crl.M.P.No.47 of 2016 in S.C.No.268 of 2013.) 1. This petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 04.02.2016 passed by the Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Thanjavur in Crl.M.P.No.47 of 2016 in S.C.No.268 of 2013. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent. 3. It is seen that this petitioner is facing prosecution in S.C.No.268 of 2013 for offences under Sections 294(b), 353, 506(ii) IPC and 3(1) of TNPPDL Act. The prosecution examined five witnesses of whom the petitioner/accused has not examined P.Ws.1, 4 and 5. While so, the petitioner filed a petition in Cr.M.P.No.47 of 2016 in S.C.No.268 of 2013 under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to recall the witnesses, which was dismissed by the learned Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Thanj...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »