Chennai Madurai Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Santhana Mariammal and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
S. Manikumar, J. Being aggrieved by the quantum of compensation of Rs.22,70,000/- with interest @6% per annum, awarded to the legal representatives of the deceased, M/s.National Insurance Company Limited., Theni District, is on appeal. As the challenge is limited, there is no need to advert to the finding of the Tribunal, fixing negligence on the driver of the offending vehicle, insured with the appellant company and the consequential liability. 2. Material on record discloses that in the accident which occurred on 26.02.2012, husband of the 1st respondent, an Advocate aged 40 years, died. He is survived by his wife, minor son, mother, sister and brother. They made a claim in MCOP. No.60 of 2012, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub Judge, Periyakulam, for compensation of Rs.25,00,000/-. According to them, at the time of accident, he was aged about 40 years and as an Advocate, earned Rs.20,000/- per month. The appellant opposed the quantum on the grounds that in the a...
Vasantha Kumari and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to expedite the investigation and file the final report in Crime No.321 of 2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 2nd respondent to expedite the investigation and file the final report in Crime No.321 of 2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that charge sheet has already been filed in this case in Crime No.321 of 2015 on 06.11.2015 itself before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.3, Nagercoil. 3. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
M/s. Standard Match Industries Pvt Ltd. Vs. The Assistant Executive En ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned letter No.AEEE/D/TTC/F.HTSC.Inspector/D.No.201 dated 14.03.2016 issued by the respondent and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in this Writ Petitionis for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned letter No.AEEE/D/TTC/F.HTSC.Inspector/D.No.201 dated 14.03.2016 issued by the respondent and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper. 2. Mr.G.Kasinathadurai, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondent. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The impugned order is only a provisional assessment. It only implies that final order has not been passed. In fact, they have also given time to the petitioner to appear and give explanation. Without giving explan...
Ganapathy Velalar Vs. Thiruvaleeswaran (died) and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: CRP(MD).Nos.2656 to 2659 of 2015 : The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 20.07.2015 passed in I.A.No.2166 of 2013 in O.S.No.806 of 2005 and I.A.Nos. 96 to 98 of 2015 in O.S.No.806 of 2005 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi.CRP(MD).Nos.2124 of 2015: The Civil Revision Petition is filed to call for the records and set aside the fair and executable order dated 10.07.2015 passed in execution petition in E.P.No.3 of 2013 in O.S.No.806 of 2005 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi.) 1. The Civil Revision Petitions in C.R.P(MD).Nos.2656 to 2659 of 2015 are filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 20.07.2015 passed in I.A.No.2166 of 2013 in O.S.No.806 of 2005 and I.A.Nos. 96 to 98 of 2015 in O.S.No.806 of 2005 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi. 2. The Civil Revision Petition in CRP(MD).No.2124 of 2015 is filed to call for the records and set aside the fair and executable orde...
D. John Ranjith Kumar Vs. The District Collector, Thanjavur
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order bearing Na.Ka.No.4068/2008 dated 23.11.2012 passed by the second respondent and the consequential order bearing Na.Ka.No.4068/2008/chat.A dated 20.03.2013 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to refix the rent on the basis of the handed over area of 11,653 Sq.ft to the petitioner and direct the respondents to return the excess amount paid by the petitioner along with the deposit made by the petitioner and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) The prayer in this Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order bearing Na.Ka.No.4068/2008 dated 23.11.2012 passed by the second respondent and the consequential order bearing Na.Ka.No.4068/2008/chat.A dated 20.03.2013...
M/s. National Insurance Company Limited., Tiruchy Vs. C. Rajammal and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 11.04.2005 in MCOP.No.2715 of 2002 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, III Additional Sub Court, Tiruchirappalli.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal by M/s.National Insurance Company Limited., Cantonment, Tiruchy, is to the quantum of compensation of Rs.18,27,000/-, with interest, @ 9% per annum, awarded to the legal representatives of the deceased. As the challenge is limited, there is no need to advert to the finding of the Tribunal, fixing negligence on the driver of the offending vehicle, insured with the appellant company and the consequential liability. 2. According to the wife, minor children aged 10 and 4 years respectively, at the time of filing of the claim petition and parents, in the accident which occurred on 09.07.2002, their breadwinner Chelladurai died. At the time of accident, he was working as a Mechanist Grade-II in IPP / Workshop (...
Thiruchendur Murugan and Others Vs. State Rep. by, The Deputy Superint ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to file a final report in Crime No.76 of 2012 dated 19.12.2012 pending on the file of the 2nd respondent police.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 2nd respondent to file a final report in Crime No.76 of 2012 dated 19.12.2012 pending on the file of the 2nd respondent police. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that if some more time is granted by this Court, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed by the respondent police before the concerned Court. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to complete the investigation in Crime No.76 of 2012 and to file a final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order....
N. Prasanth Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable T.V Corp ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to grant LCO number to the petitioner, who is having Cable Television Registration No.896 dated 03.02.2016 issued by the Head Post Master, Bodinayakkanur and running Cable Television Network at K.N.Cable T.V, Ward No.4, Door No.3, Kottai Karuppasamy Kovil Street, Gudalur, Theni District, and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petitionis for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to grant LCO number to the petitioner, who is having Cable Television Registration No.896 dated 03.02.2016 issued by the Head Post Master, Bodinayakkanur and running Cable Television Network at K.N.Cable T.V, Ward No.4, Door No.3, Kottai Karuppasamy Kovil Street, Gudalur, Theni District. 2. Mr.A.Abdul Saleem, represented by Mr.S.Satheesh Kumar learned Counsel takes notice for the respondents. 3. By ...
M.S. Hygiene Jose Vs. The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generati ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the Impugned order passed by the 2rd respondent in his proceedings Ka.No.Ei.Ni.Po/Vini/Para/Ko.Kattu/A.No.658/16 dated 10.02.16 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to provide the electricity connection to the petitioner s house in Re-Survey No.915/2 of Eraniel Village having an extent of 15 cents and building bearing No.27/62C of Nulivilai Panchayat,Kalkulam Taluk Kanyakumari District on executing the indemnity bond under Clause 27(4) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code 2004 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petitionis for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the Impugned order passed by the 2rd respondent in his proceedings Ka.No.Ei.Ni.Po/Vini/Para/Ko.Kattu/A.No.658/16 dated 10.02.1...
V. Kalyan Vs. The Tamilnadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Co ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Mar-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from erecting any high voltage electric towers in the properties of the petitioner's in Survey No.33/2B, 33/4, 10, 11, 12, 27/7 and 26/7 of Muthulapuram Village in Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District or drawing high voltage electric line over them without following the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885 and pass such further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The only point which has been raised by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the electricity tower and the line were sought to be erected in the petitioner's land and a portion of the land will get affected due to the same. Hence, the petitioner made an objection on 14.03.2016, but the same was not considered by the respondents so far. 2. She further submits that as per the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in 2010-3 L....
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »