Chennai Madurai Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Lakshmi Vs. The Tahsildar, Mudukulathur Taluk Office, Mudukulathur ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-22-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to measure the land and fix the four boundaries by the second respondent in S.No.89/1B, measuring an extent of 1.52.5 hectares in Keelathooval Village, Mudukulathur Taluk, Ramanathapuram District based on the Petitioner's application dated 27.09.2016 to the first respondent, within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. The Petitioner seeks for a direction to the first respondent to measure the land and fix the four boundaries by the second respondent in S.No.89/1B, measuring an extent of 1.52.5 hectares in Keelathooval Village, Mudukulathur Taluk, Ramanathapuram District based on the Petitioner's application dated 27.09.2016 to the first respondent, within the time stipulated by this Court. 2. Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petit...
S. Prabaharan Vs. The Registrar, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Ti ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents more particularly the 1st respondent to grant approval for the petitioner to continue his studies of 2nd year B.B.A (Business Administration) course during the academic year 2016-2017 in the 3rd respondent college on the application of the 3rd respondent.) 1. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the respondents, more particularly, the first respondent to grant approval for him to continue his studies of 2nd year B.B.A (Business Administration) course during the academic year 2016-2017 in the 3rd respondent college on the application of the 3rd respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the first and second respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent. 3. The petitioner was originally pursuing his studies at S.T.Hindu College, Nagercoil, in B.B.A., course dur...
S. Arumaidas Vs. The Secretary to Government, Home Department and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 26.08.2013 made in W.P.(MD)No.13150 of 2013.) M.V. Muralidaran, J. 1. Challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.13150 of 2013, dated 26.08.2013, the third party / appellant has filed this Writ Appeal. 2. Originally the 4th respondent herein Mr.P.Pallikonda Perumal, who is a writ petitioner in W.P.No.13150 of 2013 has filed the above writ petition for issuing a Writ of Mandamus to direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to record the name of the Village of the Petitioner as Chidambarapuram Panchayat in respect of Ward No.1 and 2 of Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram Panchayat in Aadhar Card enrolment. The 4th respondent, who is the writ petitioner, belongs to the Chidambarapuram has filed this writ petition in W.P.No.13150 of 2013. 3. Considering their case, this Court by order dated 26.08.2013 passed the following order: 7. In view of that, it is clear that the petitioner's village consisting of...
The Special Tahsildar (L.A), Tamil University, Thanjavur Vs. Thamas Ud ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-22-2016
(Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, praying to set aside the judgment and decree made in L.A.O.P.No.125 / 1996 dated 26.10.2004 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Thanjavur.) 1. This appeal has been filed by the Referring Officer / Land Acquisition Officer who had been specially designated for the purpose of acquiring the land for Tamil University, Thanjavur. It is not in dispute that vast extent of lands were acquired in Nilagiri Therkkuthottam Village and Pillayarpatti Village in Thanjavur Taluk for establishing Tamil University at Thanjavur. The notification under Section 4(1) was issued on 27.01.1982. The land belonging to the respondents, measuring an extent of 4.55 acres in Survey No.201A-8 in Pillayarpatti Village was also acquired. Though the Special Land Acquisition Officer / appellant fixed market value at Rs.3,600/- per acre, the Tribunal, pursuant to reference under Section 18 of the Act enhanced the compensation from Rs.3,600/- pe...
Arthur Selvakumar Vs. The District Collector, Tirunelveli and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to cancel the order dated 03.08.2008 passed by the respondent based upon the decree in O.S.No.7 of 2001, since the said decree was set aside in O.S.No.304 of 2006, on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Valliyoor by considering the petitioner s representation dated 24.01.2014 and consequently directing the respondent to pass order to issue house tax and water tax receipts in Ward No.2 of Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram Panchayat in the name of Jacobpuram.) M.V. Muralidaran, J. 1. The writ petitioner one Mr.Arthur Selvakumar, who belongs to Jacobpuram has filed this writ petition seeking the prayer to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to cancel the order dated 03.08.2008 passed by the respondent based upon the decree in O.S.No.7 of 2001, since the said decree was set aside in O.S.No.304 of 2006, on the file of Additional Di...
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, School E ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the interim order dated 15.12.2015, passed in M.P.(MD).No.2 of 2015 in W.P.(MD).No.22514 of 2015, by a learned Single Judge of this Court.) 1. These Appeals have been filed as against the common order, dated 15.12.2015, made in M.P.(MD).Nos.2, 2, 2, 2, 2 and 2 of 2015 in W.P.(MD).Nos.22514 to 22519 of 2015, whereby and whereunder this Court directed the 4th appellant herein to give temporary approval to the first respondent in all the appeals, who were appointed as Post Graduate Assistants and B.T. Assistant, as the case may be. 2. In the year 2011, the first respondents in W.A.(MD).Nos.183, 184, 185, 186 and 188 of 2015 were appointed as P.G. Assistants and the first respondent in W.A.(MD).No.187 of 2015 was appointed as B.T. Assistant by the Correspondent of the second respondent school, whose Correspondent-ship was approved by the fourth respondent - the District Educational Officer on 10.02.2011. In that situ...
R.T.M.L.M.S. Higher Secondary School, Venkanji, Kollemcode Post, J. Ne ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order of the third respondent passed in his proceedings in Aa.Ni.Mu.No.364/Aa3/12, dated 17.11.2012 and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to approve the appointment of Mr.S.Nixen as Junior Assistant in the Petitioner's School from 2.5.2008 and pay all the attendant benefits from 2.5.2008 onwards.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the order of the third respondent passed in Aa.Ni.Mu.No.364/Aa3/12, dated 17.11.2012, vide which, the 3rd respondent has returned the proposal, directing the petitioner school to act in accordance with G.O.No.115, dated 30.5.2007. The petitioner has also sought for direction to the respondents to accord approval for the appointment of Mr.S.Nixen as Junior Assistant in the petitioner school w.e.f. 2.5.2008 with all attendant monetary benefits. 2. He...
M/s. Karur K.C.P. Packkagings Limited, Rep. By its General Manager, Ka ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent herein to Adjudicate and to pass final order/order-in-original pursuant to the show cause notice C.No.VIII/20/1562/2015-DBK dated 21.01.2016 considering the reply dated 15.03.2016 within a reasonable time as fixed by this Honble Court.) 1. This writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent to adjudicate and pass final order/order-in-original pursuant to the show cause notice in C.No.VIII/20/1562/2015-DBK, dated 21.01.2016. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though they have given their explanation to the show cause notice as early as on 15.03.2016, the third respondent has not passed the final order/order-in-original till this date. 3. Though the petitioner has raised so many grounds in support of their contention on merits of the matter, this Court, at this stage, is not inclined to go into the same and give any f...
Rengasamy Vs. The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka/19371/2015 A6 dated 25.11.2015 and quash the same.) 1. This writ petition is filed against the order of the third respondent made in patta proceedings. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that when there is a title dispute between the parties, the revenue authorities cannot go into the same and on the other hand, they have to relegate the parties to agitate the matter before the competent civil Court. 3. Needless to say that if there is any title dispute, it is for the appellate authority to find out the same and if he comes to a conclusion that there is a title dispute between the parties, necessarily the parties have to be relegated to the competent civil Court to agitate their respective rights. Needless to say that as against the impugned order, the petitioner has right of appeal before the Reve...
Raja Mohammed Vs. The Taluk Officer/Tahsildar, Madurai District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-22-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to survey the Petitioner's land which is comprised in S.No.77/2A1A measuring an extent of 5 cents situated at Thanakkankulam, Thirupparankundram Taluk, Madurai District and fix four boundaries within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. No representation for the Petitioner. 2. The Petitioner seeks for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to survey the Petitioner's land which is comprised in S.No.77/2A1A measuring an extent of 5 cents situated at Thanakkankulam, Thirupparankundram Taluk, Madurai District and to fix the four boundaries of the said land. 3. Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. 4. Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent and main Writ Petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 5. It appears that ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »