Chennai Madurai Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chockkiah and Others Vs. State Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Po ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. against the judgment, dated 17.03.2015, made in Spl.S.C.No.6 of 2008, by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Theni.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellants are the accused 1 to 4 in Special S.C.No.6 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Theni. They stood charged for the offences under Sections 341, 302 r/w 34, 506(ii) IPC and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. By judgment dated 17.03.2015, the trial Court acquitted all the four accused from the charge under Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, however, convicted them under Sections 341, 506(ii) and 302 r/w 34 IPC and sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 341 IPC; to undergo simple imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 506(ii) IPC; and to undergo imprisonment for l...
Jayaraman Vs. Senthil Kumar
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, praying this Court to call for the records relating to the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.929 of 2011 in O.S.No.73 of 2010, dated 16.4.2012, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul and to set aside the same.) 1. This revision has been filed seeking for a direction to set aside the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.929 of 2011 in O.S.No.73 of 2010, dated 16.04.2012, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul 2. According to the Petitioner that the respondent herein filed a suit in O.S.No.73 of 2010 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul for recovery of money against the revision petitioner. In the said suit, the Petitioner herein was set ex-parte and an ex-parte decree was passed by the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul Due to his illness, the revision petition was not able to appear before the Court and hence the suit was set ex...
A. Ahamed Ibrahim Vs. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings letter (2g) No.85 dated 27.08.2013 and the consequential inter-se-seniority list circular issued by the 3rd respondent in his proceedings Ma.Ne.1/25997/2010 dated 23.09.2013 and quash the same as illegal.) 1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned Clarification Letter passed by the first respondent in his proceedings letter (2g) No.85 dated 27.08.2013 and the consequential issuance of inter-se- seniority list circular issued by the 3rd respondent in his proceedings Ma.Ne.1/25997/2010, dated 23.09.2013. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he was initially appointed as Junior Assistant on 25.06.1993 and thereafter, he was promoted to the post of Assistant on 19.11.2009 in the third respondent Corporation. He also stated that the contesting respondents 4 to 8 w...
M.V.S. Muthuvel (Died) Vs. J.P. Thomas
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer:Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 29.09.1997 made in A.S.No.177 of 1994 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tuticorin, reversing the Judgment and decree dated 24.03.1994, made in O.S.No.358 of 1993 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tuticorin.) 1. This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 29.09.1997 made in A.S.No.177 of 1994 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tuticorin, reversing the Judgment and decree dated 24.03.1994, made in O.S.No.358 of 1993 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tuticorin. 2. The appellant is the plaintiff, who succeeded in the Trial Court, but lost in the first appellate Court. The respondent is the defendant. 3. Facts of the case:- (i) The appellant filed suit in O.S.No.358 of 1993, before the Principal District Munsif Court, Tuticorin, for recovery of a sum of Rs.2,840/- together with interest for the goods sold and d...
C. Balakrishnan Vs. The State Level Scrutiny Committee, Rep. By it's C ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus caling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings No.67/CVIII/2007 dated 03.11.2015 and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondent to declare the petitioner's community certificate accordingly within the period that may stipulated by this Court.) M. Sathyanarayanan, J. 1. The petitioner challenges the proceedings of the Tamilnadu State Level Scrutiny Committee, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, dated 03.11.2015, in and by which, it has been unanimously concluded that the claim of the petitioner that he belongs to Hindu Kattunayakan Scheduled Tribe Community is found to be false. Therefore, the State Level Scrutiny Committee directed the District Collector, Madurai to initiate stringent action against the petitioner for obtaining false Scheduled Tribes Community Certificate. ...
P. Chandra Vs. The Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Madr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records connected with the impugned order passed by the second respondent in D.No.171 dated 04.02.2012 and quash the same.) M. Sathyanarayanan, J. 1. The petitioner would state that she was originally working as Reader with effect from 08.09.1997 and she was given Selection Grade on 09.09.2007 and she got her promotion as Junior Assistant on 02.01.2008. It is further stated by the petitioner that on account of want of vacancy and that the candidates selected by Tamilnadu Public Service Commission to be accommodated, she was reverted and posted as Examiner from the afternoon of 13.07.2009 and transferred to the District Court, Sivagangai. The petitioner got her promotion as Junior Assistant on 01.12.2010 and at present, she is working as Junior Assistant in Subordinate Court, Devakottai. 2. It is also stated by the petitioner that recommendation of 5th Pay Com...
Mannai Narayanasamy Educational Trust, represented by its President an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.27 of 2016 in R.C.O.P.No.12 of 2007, dated 22.9.2016, on the file of the Rent Controller-cum-District Munsif, Thanjavur.) 1. This revision has been filed seeking for a direction to set aside the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.27 of 2016 in R.C.O.P.No.12 of 2007, dated 22.09.2016, on the file of the Rent Controller-cum-District Munsif, Thanjavur. 2. According to the Petitioner, the above said R.C.O.P was filed by the respondent herein in R.C.O.P.No.12 of 2007 before the Rent Controller-cum-District Munsif, Thanjavur seeking to fix the rent in respect of the property rented out to the Petitioner's educational institutions. During the pendency of the R.C.O.P, the respondent herein filed I.A.No.18 of 2008 seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to measure and take measurements of the property, with the assistance of a Government Engin...
Chellan Vs. P.G. Mony
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 15.03.2003 made in A.S.No.151 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Court, Kanyakumari, confirming the Judgment and decree dated 03.07.2002, made in O.S.No.166 of 1998 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram.) 1. This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 15.03.2003 made in A.S.No.151 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Court, Kanyakumari, confirming the Judgment and decree dated 03.07.2002, made in O.S.No.166 of 1998 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram. 2. The defendant, who lost in the both the Courts below, is the appellant. The first respondent is the plaintiff. He filed a suit in O.S.No.166 of 1998 before the Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram, for recovery of a sum of Rs.40,500/- together with interest at 12% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree; and at 6% p.a. fr...
Raguvaran Vs. The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Kottaipattinam ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 12.11.2014 made in S.C.No.84 of 2013, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai.) S. Nagamuthu, J 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.84 of 2013, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai. He stood charged for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. By Judgment dated 12.11.2014, the Trial Court convicted the accused and sentenced him, as detailed below:- Section of LawSentence of imprisonmentFine amount302To undergo imprisonment for life.Rs.2,000- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.201 r/w 34 IPCTo undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years.Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. The sentences have been ordered to run concurrently. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant has come up with this Criminal ...
R.V. Shanmugasamy Vs. The District Educational Officer, Court Road, Pe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
(Prayer in W.P(MD)No.12334 of 2008 : Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.3482/m3 dated 16.12.2008 and quash the portion of conceling the petitioner's secretaryship of the Nadar Saraswathi Girls Higher Secondary School, Theni. Prayer in W.P(MD)No.12335 of 2008 : Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.5065/m3 dated 23.12.2008 and quash the same. Prayer in W.P(MD)No.12335 of 2008 : Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.3482/m3 dated 16.12.2008 and quash the same.) Common Order 1. In all these writ petitions, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners s...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »