Chennai Madurai Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T. Ayyappan Vs. The Director Directorate of Employment and Training an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to include the name of the petitioner with the registration No. 1991 MO2388 in the live register maintained at the office of the 3rd respondents and to forward the petitioner's name when called for by the Teachers Recruitment Board, the 4th respondent herein under Rule 10(a)(i) of the General Rule of State and Subordinate Serives to appoint Post Graduate Teachersin regular time scale of pay.) 1. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to include the name of the petitioner with the registration No. 1991 MO2388 in the live register maintained at the office of the 3rd respondents and to forward the petitioner's name when called for by the Teachers Recruitment Board, the 4th respondent herein under Rule 10(a)(i) of the General Rule of State and Subordinate Serives to appoint Post Graduate Teachers in regular time scale of pay. 2. The l...
M.K. Kuumaresh Babu Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Princ ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent in proceedings No.G3/40418/11, dated 24.01.2013, quash the same and directing the respondents to give appointment to the petitioner on compassionate ground.) Order: M.V. Muralidaran, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned order of the second respondent in proceedings No.G3/40418/11, dated 24.01.2013 and seeking a direction to the respondents to give appointment to the petitioner on compassionate ground. 2. The case of the petitioner is that his mother, namely, Tmt. J.K.Manjula was employed as Assistant in the office of the third respondent. On 16.10.1997, she died while in service due to cancer. She left behind the petitioner and his father and sister as legal heirs. At that time, the petitioner was minor aged about 4 years and his fathers was old and his sister was also a minor...
N. Senthil @ Senthilkumar Vs. State rep by the Inspector of Police, Ma ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 16.08.2001 made in S.C.No.490 of 2000, on the file of the learned Second Additional District Judge, Madurai.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the first accused in S.C.No.490 of 2000, on the file of the learned Second Additional District Judge, Madurai. There were five other accused, who were arrayed as accused Nos.2 to 6 in the case. The Trial Court framed as many as three charges against the accused, as detailed below. ChargeAccusedPenal Provisions11 to 6396 r/w 398 IPC21302 IPC32 to 6302 r/w 34 IPC By Judgment dated 16.08.2001, the Trial Court convicted the accused, as detailed below:- AccusedSection of LawSentenceFine amount1 to 5396 r/w 398 IPCTo undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years.Rs.100/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month.1302 IPCTo undergo imprisonment for life.Rs.200/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two months...
Mayavathi Lalitha Vs. The District Collector, Tuticorin District and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the 3rd Respondent from effecting any change in the name of the Petitioner in payment of tax payable in respect of properties mentioned in Door Nos.1A, 2A, 4A, 4B, 4C and 4D at Santhaikadai Street, which is of an extent of 3 1/2 cents situate at Resurvey No.279/1 and Door Nos.3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E and 3F at Sathyamoorthy Bazaar, which is of an extentof 7 1/2 cents at Resurvey No.279/1 at Udankudi Village, Tuticorin District, without conducting proper enquiry in accordance with law.) 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the 3rd Respondent from effecting any change in the name of the Petitioner in payment of tax payable in respect of properties mentioned in Door Nos.1A, 2A, 4A, 4B, 4C and 4D at Santhaikadai Street, which is of an extent of 3 1/2 cents situate at Resurvey No.279/1 and Door Nos.3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E and 3F at ...
S. Soni Vs. The Director of School Education and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2ndrespondentto relieve the Petitioner from Chennai Higher Secondary School, Tharamani, so as to enable the Petitioner to join duty at Government HigherSecondary School, Melattur, in Thanjavur District on the basis of the order passed by the 1st Respondent in Na.Ka.No.125762/C2/E1/2010 dated 28-12-2010.) 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondentto relieve the Petitioner from Chennai Higher Secondary School, Tharamani, so as to enable her to join duty at Government HigherSecondary School, Melattur, in Thanjavur District on the basis of the order passed by the 1st Respondent in Na.Ka.No.125762/C2/E1/2010 dated 28-12-2010. 2. It is seen from the records that this writ petition is filed in the year 2011 and there are 5 years have been lapsed. Therefore, the prayer in this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petiti...
K. Koodalingam Vs. The Chairman The Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent to release the Selection List of the Petitioner without adhering to the Criminal Case in Spl. SC No.2/2008 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Madurai, which has acquitted the Petitioner and consequently direct the Respondents to send the Petitioner to undergo training and to give all other benefits.) 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent to release the Selection List of the Petitioner without adhering to the Criminal Case in Spl. SC No.2/2008 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Madurai, which has acquitted the Petitioner, and consequently direct the Respondents to send the Petitioner to undergo training and to give all other benefits. 2. Heard Mr.F.Deepak, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.K.Guru, learned ...
M. Kannan Vs. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to issue posting order to the petitioner for the post of Village Assistant for the interview attended by the petitioner on 15/09/2010 in the office of the 2nd respondent as per notice in Na.Ka.No. E1/2238/2010 dated 31/08/2010.) 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to issue posting order to the petitioner for the post of 'Village Assistant' for the interview attended by the petitioner on 15.09.2010 in the office of the 2nd respondent as per notice in Na.Ka.No. E1/2238/2010 dated 31.08.2010. 2. The publication was made in the year 2010 and the petitioner also attended the interview, but he was not selected. If anybody is selected, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same in the manner known to law. 3. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequ...
S. Balamurugan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to follow the procedures laid down under Section 10-B of the Tamil Nadu Pawn Brokers Act 1943 while taking the pledges from the petitioner's shop viz., Gomathi Shanmugam Nagai Adagu Kadai at No.49, Raja Street, Avaiyapuram, Madurai 12.) 1. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the second respondent to follow the procedures laid down under Section 10-B of the Tamil Nadu Pawn Brokers Act 1943 while taking the pledges from the petitioner's shop viz., Gomathi Shanmugam Nagai Adagu Kadai at No.49, Raja Street, Avaiyapuram, Madurai 12. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate would submit that whenever necessary arise, the respondents would follow the procedures laid down under Section 10-B of the Tamil Nadu Pawn Brokers Act 1943, while taking the pledges from the petitioner's shop viz., Gomathi Shanmugam Nagai Adagu ...
S. Velu Vs. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 29.12.2011 within a time limit as fixed by this Court.) 1. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider and dispose of his representation, dated 29.12.2011, within a time limit as fixed by this Court. 2. Heard Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr.K.Guru, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.D.Srinivasa Raghavan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 4 to 9. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it would suffice if the representation of the petitioner is disposed of, by the first respondent, on merits and in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court. 4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the r...
The United India Insurance Company Limited, through its Assistant Mana ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the order passed M.C.O.P.No.57 of 1998, dated 02.08.2004 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Principal Subordinate Judge), Padmanabhapuram. Cross Objection filed under Order 41 Rule 22 of Civil Procedure Code praying this Court to modify the judgement and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.57 of 1998, dated 2.8.2004, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Principal Subordinate Judge), Padmanabhapuram.) 1. The appellant/Insurance Company has preferred this appeal challenging the award passed by the Tribunal M.C.O.P.No.57 of 1998, dated 02.08.2004 on the ground of liability and quantum. 2. The claimants 1 to 8 have filed cross-objection to modify the judgement and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.57 of 1998, dated 02.08.2004, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Principal Subordinate Judge), Padmanabhapuram. 3. According to the appellant that the respondents 1 to 8 are ...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »