Chennai Madurai Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Maniyanchi Village Panchayat, Represented by its President, Nalla Alag ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-17-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to set aside the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.416 of 2015 in O.S.No.36 of 2012, dated 6.1.2016, on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Vadipatti.) 1. This revision has been filed seeking to set aside the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.416 of 2015 in O.S.No.36 of 2012, dated 06.01.2016, on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Vadipatti. 2. According to the learned counsel for the Petitioner that an agreement was entered between the Petitioner-Panchayat and the father of the respondent, for running a Touring Talkies at Maniyanchi Village at Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District from 25.05.2001 to 28.02.2012 for a period of 12 years, measuring an extent of 82 cents in R.S.No.38/1 and R.S.No.40/1. The third installment was not paid by the respondent's father and the said property was misused for some other illegal purpo...
Malliga Arulkumar Vs. The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-17-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent herein to take necessary action to cancel the documents referred to in the order passed by the second respondent dated 24.12.2014 by considering the representation given by the petitioner dated 14.08.2015 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Challenging the order passed by the second respondent dated 24.12.2014, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. 2. According to the petitioner, he made an application before the second respondent to cancel the Document No.1149/1984, dated 10.05.2011, registered on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Thiruverumbur, Trichy. Based on his representation, the second respondent also conducted an enquiry and examined all the parties concerned and passed an order in his proceedings dated 24.12.2014, whereby, he has come to the conclusion that the above documents has been fraudulently created, but the...
Subburaj Vs. The Tahsildar, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-17-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.2065 dated 15.04.2016 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to issue legal heirship certificate to the petitioner forthwith.) 1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the respondent/Tashildar rejecting the petitioner's request for issuing the legal-heir certificate. 2. According to the petitioner, he is the brother of one Balakrishnan, an unmarried person and died on 24.11.2015. During his life time, he was living with the petitioner and their parents also died. After his death, the petitioner along with his four brothers and three sisters filed an application before the respondent for issuance of legal-heir certificate. Based on the application, an enquiry was also conducted and statement was also obtained by the Revenue Inspect...
M.R. Subramani Vs. A.S. Elangovan and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-17-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to set aside the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.607 of 2010 in O.S.No.369 of 2010, dated 23.09.2011 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Karur.) 1. This revision has been filed seeking to set aside the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.607 of 2010 in O.S.No.369 of 2010, dated 23.09.2011 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Karur. 2. The Petitioner as plaintiff has filed a suit in O.S.No.379 of 2010, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Karur. The aforesaid suit was filed for permanent injunction against the respondents. According to the Petitioner, the first respondent is the absolute owner of the suit property by virtue of registered sale deed, dated 8.1.1996 executed by one Muthusamy. The Petitioner is doing contract business and supply of water and soil in the name of 'MRS Earth Works and Movers' and having JCB Lorry Tipper Lorry. Th...
C. Karunakaran Vs. The Authorized Officer,Syndicate Bank, Regional Off ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-17-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call for the records pertaining the E-Auction Sale Notice Ref.No.MRO/REC/2015/SARFAESI dated 28.09.2015 and the consequential sale held on 13.11.2015 ending up with issuance of Sale Certificate and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to confirm the sale in favour of the petitioner pursuant to the E-Auction Sale Notice dated 05.05.2015 and the sale held on 10.06.2015 in respect of the property in Door No.1, Pandian Nagar,Dindigul.) M. Sathyanarayanan, J. 1. By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner, would aver among other things, that his wife had started the Company along with one Raja in the name and style of M/s.Green Health Agro Oils (P) Ltd and borrowed credit facilities to the tune of Rs.3.25 crores from the second respondent bank and the wife of the petitioner stood as a guarantor and mort...
Parvin Vs. The Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-14-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to release the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Regn.No.TN 72 AH 7426 forthwith.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the respondents to release the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Regn.No.TN 72 AH 7426 forthwith. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been plying Omni Bus bearing Regn.No.TN 72 AH 7426 from Trichy to Chennai and the said vehicle was transferred in her name on 10.02.2016; that on 28.08.2016, when the bus was on its way to Karur for some maintenance works, the said vehicle was impounded by the 2nd and the 3rd respondents on the ground that it carried extra five seats and the bus was taken to the 1st respondent office; that she submitted detailed representations dated 16.09.2016 and 28....
T. Sivanatham Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secret ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
Prayer: Habeas Corpus Petitionis filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other Writ and pass suitable direction or order as follows:- A.directing the Superintendent of Sub-Jail at Pudukkottai to produce Mr.Boopathikarthikeyan and Mr.Duraiguna @ Gunasekaran, who were remanded by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangudi in Crime No.187 of 2016, on the file of the Karampakudi Police Station, on 10.06.2016 before this Court B. directing the respondent Nos.1 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of Mr.Boopathikarthikeyan and Duraiguna @ Gunasekaran. C. Directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to submit a detail report at earliest to this Hon'ble Court with regard to the violations committed on Mr.Boopathikarthikeyan and Duraiguna @ Gunasekaran and pay the compensation for the violation as this Hon'ble Court may fix. D. issuing any other order direction as this Hon'ble Court may consider fit and proper in the circumstance of this matter.) S. N...
M/s. Srishti Communications, represented by its Proprietor S. Kumar, B ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the first respondent dated 27.10.2015 vide proceedings No.G.16/DGM/ARB/CCM, nominating the third respondent as sole arbitrator and to quash the same, and consequently, set aside the proceedings of the third respondent, dated 26.09.2016 and to appoint an independent arbitrator to decide the disputes arisen between the petitioner and the respondent on the execution of contract dated 11.06.2011.) Challenging the appointment of Arbitrator and also the consequential order passed by the third respondent Arbitrator, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. According to the petitioner, he entered into an agreement with Southern Railway for displaying commercial advertisement at the fa ade, Madurai Railway Station on 11.6.2011 for a period of five years commencing from 29.4.2011 to 28.4.2016. During the course of its business, c...
R. Muthuselvi Vs. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Prayer: W.P.(MD)No.21468 of 2015 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to select and appoint the petitioner (Register Number 100412146) to the post of Typist based on the marks and on merits as per overall Rank 697 and Communal Rank 145 for the post of Typist in MBC Category based on the selection conducted as per Notification No.401 of 2014 dated 14.10.2014 issued by the respondent.) 1. The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission issued Notification No.18/2014 with Advertisement No.401/2014 dated 14.10.2014 inviting applications only through on-line mode upto 12.11.2014 for appointment to the written examination for direct recruitment against the vacancies for several posts, namely, Junior Assistant, Bill Collector Grade-I, Typist, Steno-Typist Grade-III etc., making it clear that the last date for submission of applications was on 12.11.2014, the last date for payment of fee through bank or post of...
The Joint Director of School Education (Personnel), DPI Campus, Colleg ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 29.09.2016 made in W.P.(MD).No.17787 of 2016.) M. Sathyanarayanan, J. 1. By consent, the Writ Appeal itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition would aver among other things that pursuant to the selection conducted by the Teacher Recruitment Board, by proceedings, dated 15.07.2006, the petitioner was appointed as Block Resource Teacher Educator (hereinafter referred to 'BRTE') and joined in the services of the respondents therein. Since the date of her appointment, she claims that she is discharging her duties diligently and sincerely to the utmost satisfaction of her superiors and considering her unblemished records of service, she was posted as Supervisor (incharge) and presently, she is serving as Supervisor at Kadayanallur. The petitioner attained the age of superannuation on 30.09.2016 and in order to have employment till the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »